Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 49
|
Originally Posted by: steveishere  It's been consistent enough. They aren't going to be putting pressure in the QBs face on every play and especially not when teams are using extra protection. If the other team is using extra blockers and the pressure isn't getting there it's still a win because some of their weapons are being taken away. The pressure has overall looked really good this year to me. It's also a win when teams back off the vertical game and go to more 3 step drops, quick screens to the outside, and to their running backs out of the backfield. We got burned on one big quick outside screen last week but I would much rather see teams try to beat us like this then like it was last year when they were lighting the DB's up downfield and converting way to many 20+ yard plays. The only time I see that now is when Capers goes to that stupic 3 man rush. |
"The train is leaving the station." |
 1 user applaud's warhawk for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 30
|
Originally Posted by: warhawk It's also a win when teams back off the vertical game and go to more 3 step drops, quick screens to the outside, and to their running backs out of the backfield.
We got burned on one big quick outside screen last week but I would much rather see teams try to beat us like this then like it was last year when they were lighting the DB's up downfield and converting way to many 20+ yard plays.
The only time I see that now is when Capers goes to that stupic 3 man rush.
should never be getting beat over the top in a 3 man rush. If you play a sound zone coverage aspect a 3 man rush is a decent play for 3rd and forever. I wouldn't get carried away with it though. I'm one of those guys that likes a 4 man rush minimum. If it's a 3 man rush I'd like it to be a surprise element like a safety or linebacker coming from another area. |
blank |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 13
Applause Received: 94
|
The important thing is that it is better than last year. The good thing is that it should continue to get better as our young player gain experience. |
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame? |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States
Applause Given: 1,317
Applause Received: 937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 128
Applause Received: 179
|
Green Bay is leading the league with 28 sacks. Wow.
Offtopic but we are currently tied for 4th in interceptions, but 7 behind the leader. Waaaaaay down the list in forced fumbles. We also have 0 defensive touchdowns, while Chicago has 7. |
call me Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 204
Applause Received: 138
|
Originally Posted by: gbguy20 Green Bay is leading the league with 28 sacks. Wow.
Offtopic but we are currently tied for 4th in interceptions, but 7 behind the leader. Waaaaaay down the list in forced fumbles. We also have 0 defensive touchdowns, while Chicago has 7. Hasn't Chicago only played one team with a winning record, and lost BIG time to them (the Packers)? I think their schedule is about to get much more difficult. Hopefully they won't keep up their dominant defense performance. They are elite this season for sure, but I certainly expect (hope) them to come back down to earth over the remainder of the season. |
- X-Box 360 Gamer Tag: DoddPower
|
2 users applaud doddpower for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.