Green Bay Packers Forum
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Porforis  
#16 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:11:30 AM(UTC)
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
RIP?
Hell the man ain't dead.


And even if he were, he'd carry the team on his back.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 10/26/2012(UTC), zombieslayer on 10/26/2012(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#17 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:12:26 AM(UTC)
The injury should make it easier to resign Jennings if the team wants to. Every missed game lowers his price. Only question is, how low does it need to go? Jordy and Jones are both getting around the 3 million next year. Where does Greg need to be, to be affordable? 5 million?
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Cheesey on 10/26/2012(UTC)
Offline polargrizz  
#18 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:23:20 AM(UTC)
Jordy Nelson will be held out of practice again on Friday, and won't test his hamstring until Saturday or Sunday.The hamstring pull "sounds a little worse than first thought," says the Green Bay Press-Gazette. If he's not going to test the hamstring before the weekend, Nelson's best-case scenario is a game-time decision.
Offline polargrizz  
#19 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:25:21 AM(UTC)
Could the Jag game be a trap? What if both the Packers and bears both lose respectivly to the Jags and Panthers?
Offline go.pack.go.  
#20 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:52:40 AM(UTC)
I say we let Jordy sit this week. He's not 100% so let's not risk him hurting the hamstring even more. Plus we got the bye week coming up. Let him get rested and come back completely healthy for the rest of the season.
Offline zombieslayer  
#21 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 12:30:14 PM(UTC)
polargrizz said: Go to Quoted Post
Could the Jag game be a trap? What if both the Packers and bears both lose respectivly to the Jags and Panthers?


If both of our teams lose to these crappy teams, then the NFC North doesn't deserve to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl.
Offline Porforis  
#22 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 12:51:29 PM(UTC)
polargrizz said: Go to Quoted Post
Could the Jag game be a trap? What if both the Packers and bears both lose respectivly to the Jags and Panthers?


The only games that really make me nervous are against top 5 or bottom 5 teams. Either the Packers are playing a very good team and can't afford too many mistakes, or are playing a bad team with something to prove and are in danger of being caught sleeping.
Offline Cheesey  
#23 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 2:39:28 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
The injury should make it easier to resign Jennings if the team wants to. Every missed game lowers his price. Only question is, how low does it need to go? Jordy and Jones are both getting around the 3 million next year. Where does Greg need to be, to be affordable? 5 million?


That's kind of how i see it. He looks injury prone, which might turn off other teams from offering him the big bucks.
Offline Porforis  
#24 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 2:55:19 PM(UTC)
Cheesey said: Go to Quoted Post
That's kind of how i see it. He looks injury prone, which might turn off other teams from offering him the big bucks.


In which case, do WE really want to pay the premium dollar to keep him if it means not keeping and developing say, a Borel or Gurley?
Offline Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:40:58 AM(UTC)
Surgery delayed.

“Exactly when he will go?” McCarthy said. “That has not been determined yet.”
Offline PackerTraxx  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:04:05 AM(UTC)
One would think they would want to get this finished as soon as possible. An extra week to heal/play is somewhat critical. Each game is extremely important to us since the refs/league stole the Seattle game and Chicago pulled one out of the fire last week maintaining a 2 game lead. If they have a 1 game lead when we play them, then our fate is in our own hands. If they have a 2 game lead it probably won't matter much.
Offline wpr  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:18:59 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
One would think they would want to get this finished as soon as possible. An extra week to heal/play is somewhat critical. Each game is extremely important to us since the refs/league stole the Seattle game and Chicago pulled one out of the fire last week maintaining a 2 game lead. If they have a 1 game lead when we play them, then our fate is in our own hands. If they have a 2 game lead it probably won't matter much.


Da Bears tough schedule is in front of them. SF will take them down (there is your 1 game lead.) But first they face Houston. Chicago always seems to lose once to Minny. That is 3 losses before they have their rematch with GB. 4 losses and Cutler sucking his thumb once again.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:47:03 AM(UTC)
You make a good point and I would like to see that happen. But I wouldn't pencil those losses in. We have our own tough games. It isn't easy to beat Division foes twice and we have the Giants away in addition to those.
Offline Porforis  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:58:49 AM(UTC)
I will channel Madden here and say that the best way to make the postseason is to win all your games. Packers can't worry about what the Bears or Vikings are doing unless we're playing them - We have the talent to compete with anybody, and when we're not so severely battered on offense, beat anybody anywhere. No excuses for failure. Packers sweep the Bears and Vikings, that's one more loss for the Bears and two for the Vikings.
Offline Pack93z  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 8:03:02 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
One would think they would want to get this finished as soon as possible. An extra week to heal/play is somewhat critical. Each game is extremely important to us since the refs/league stole the Seattle game and Chicago pulled one out of the fire last week maintaining a 2 game lead. If they have a 1 game lead when we play them, then our fate is in our own hands. If they have a 2 game lead it probably won't matter much.


I think the doctors of Philadelphia have more pressing issues than to get Greg Jennings in for surgery.

But I understand your point, one would think that there would be alternatives that they could turn to now with the East having Mother Nature issues at the moment.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter