Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
5 Pages<1234>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
zombieslayer  
#21 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:08:52 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
I hate big spreads they are way too hard to bet on.


We'll cover 13 points. Easily.

My thing is I want our D to show dominance against the NFL's most limp O who on top of being the NFL's most limp O has just lost their best offensive player possibly for the season.

This team is really, really bad offensively. Their starting QB hasn't thrown for 200 yards since week 1. Their #1 RB, easily the best player on the O, is out for possibly the year. Their #1 WR has 14 receptions and zero TDs. Yes, not making this stuff up.
Gaycandybacon  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:11:22 PM(UTC)
We just need to win. The team needs to get back into that feeling of winning multiple games again. I don't believe in moral victories or kicking their ass. Just win the damn game and come out injury free.
RaiderPride  
#23 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 5:04:02 PM(UTC)
One nice thing about game planning for this week is... The Packers Defensive back field really does not have to worry too much about, is number 14. The 5th overall pick last year! I know it is early but man, does Justin Blackman ever look totally out of sorts in this leauge compared to the NCAA.

Justin has been targeted 37 times through his first six games in the NFL, but has just 14 catches for 126 yards and no touchdowns.

It will be interesting theatre to watch him on Sunday.

LambeauEast  
#24 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:30:32 AM(UTC)
I too am worried about the "playing down to the cometition" deal the Packers are famous for. Packers lose a heartbreaker.

Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:33:04 AM(UTC)
The Packers have never beaten the Jaguars at Lambeau Field

[aiee] [aiee] [aiee]
polargrizz  
#26 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:35:41 AM(UTC)
nice to see that both the packers and bears are getting an extra bye week this week
TheKanataThrilla  
#27 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:56:01 AM(UTC)
Spread is going up. It is 16 here in Ontario. I am betting the Jags in my weekly pool as I think a last minute backdoor cover. I will be happy if the Pack crush them. I am just afraid they take them lightly.
wpr  
#28 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:19:52 AM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Spread is going up. It is 16 here in Ontario. I am betting the Jags in my weekly pool as I think a last minute backdoor cover. I will be happy if the Pack crush them. I am just afraid they take them lightly.


Must be the CAD difference. [grin1]

I see -12.5 to -15.5 for the Vegas line.
Pack93z  
#29 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:39:19 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers have never beaten the Jaguars at Lambeau Field

[aiee] [aiee] [aiee]


Yep, and Coach Lombardi has never won a game with Rodgers at the helm.

UserPostedImage
Yerko  
#30 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:41:27 AM(UTC)
There could be a possibility of being very very limited at WR Sunday. Nelson's hammy tightened up on him yesterday and they don't know the severity of it yet. Driver couldn't finish practice with neck issues. With Jennings still out, that leaves us with 3 WR: Jones, Cobb, and Boykin.

Hoping Jordy's hamstring isn't anything serious.
Porforis  
#31 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:14:37 AM(UTC)
Personally, I think if Nelson's good to go we should still limit his snaps. We can't just rest everyone kind of dinged up and assume we'll still trounce them, winning is a must, but we don't want to get more beat up. This likely means a lot more Cobb magic, it'd be interesting to see a fleaflicker or some other sort of fake with Cobb in the backfield (especially if we use that formation and give it to Cobb a couple times earlier in the game). Jones will need to play at a high level, and I guess we'll find out what Boykin can bring in a regular season game. Could also go in more TE heavy sets with Finley and Crabtree for a high percentage of the time, especially if we have luck on the ground early.
zombieslayer  
#32 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:25:25 AM(UTC)
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
Personally, I think if Nelson's good to go we should still limit his snaps. We can't just rest everyone kind of dinged up and assume we'll still trounce them, winning is a must, but we don't want to get more beat up. This likely means a lot more Cobb magic, it'd be interesting to see a fleaflicker or some other sort of fake with Cobb in the backfield (especially if we use that formation and give it to Cobb a couple times earlier in the game). Jones will need to play at a high level, and I guess we'll find out what Boykin can bring in a regular season game. Could also go in more TE heavy sets with Finley and Crabtree for a high percentage of the time, especially if we have luck on the ground early.


Completely agreed. We should have JJ as #1, Cobb as #2, and Boykin as #3 and lots of reps to Finley and Crabtree. Heck, even line Finley up as a WR in some sets.

I'd rather see Jordy drop to #4 this week than risk injuring him further. Jordy's one of the most important people we'll need for the Playoffs.
PackFanWithTwins  
#33 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:32:54 AM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
There could be a possibility of being very very limited at WR Sunday. Nelson's hammy tightened up on him yesterday and they don't know the severity of it yet. Driver couldn't finish practice with neck issues. With Jennings still out, that leaves us with 3 WR: Jones, Cobb, and Boykin.

Hoping Jordy's hamstring isn't anything serious.


If there was a game to give the run game confidence, this would be it. 29th in rushing defense. Let this line plow forward and eat up yards and clock. Don't expect either Jordy or DD to miss the game. Though I would definately try to use this game to get Boykin more time and experince.

I also wonder how Quarless is doing? If he can go, we have the chance to throw some Finley and Quarless combos at their defense.
Porforis  
#34 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:43:13 AM(UTC)
Isn't it great to have the kinds of offensive weapons even when you have multiple guys dinged up that it's hard to decide how you should focus on decimating the opposing defense?
Yerko  
#35 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:57:56 PM(UTC)
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
Isn't it great to have the kinds of offensive weapons even when you have multiple guys dinged up that it's hard to decide how you should focus on decimating the opposing defense?


It really is. I think about other teams and injuries and then look at the Packers. We truly are a spoiled bunch...haha. Thank you, Ted.

polargrizz  
#36 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 8:56:56 AM(UTC)
PACKERS 31, Jaguars 16 – Noon

The talent gap between these two teams is wider than Peyton Manning’s forehead. Short of Mike McCarthy benching both his starting offense and defense, there’s no plausible way to predict a Jaguars victory. Injuries are forcing key Packers to the bench, Charles Woodson (collarbone), Greg Jennings (groin), and possibly Jordy Nelson (hamstring). Even so, the Jaguars have no chance.

BEARS 23, Panthers 17 – Noon

This game provides the perfect palette for lazy national journalists to paint weak, subjective pap about quarterbacks Jay Cutler and Cam Newton. Rather than fan the flames of that nonsense, I’ll focus on the football. The Panthers aren’t as bad as their 1-5 record indicates. They’ve been victimized by untimely mental lapses late in games. However, from a pure talent standpoint, there’s a big gap between these teams. The Bears defense has been the most consistent unit in the NFL all season, so there’s no reason to think they won’t be again on Sunday.
zombieslayer  
#37 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 12:29:05 PM(UTC)
You really think both games will be that close Grizz?
Rios39  
#38 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 12:55:43 PM(UTC)
Only thing is with Nelson out we don't really have a number 1-2 receiver to play outside. I don't like Cobb out there except for the odd time. He's much better in the slot.
doddpower  
#39 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 2:19:10 PM(UTC)
If there's ever a game to switch up the play calling a bit and pound the rock, this has to be it. Run the ball 30 times and control the clock and I'm certain it will result in a win. It might not come off of rushing touchdowns, but with that many rushing attempts, Rodgers will get a couple nice play action passes. Even without Nelson, Jennings, Shields, Perry, et al., the Packers are still a more talented team. Given the match up, run the ball and trust the defense against a depleted offense.

This game COULD be close, but there's no reason the Packers shouldn't win. Packer's by 14.
Cheesey  
#40 Posted : Friday, October 26, 2012 2:36:11 PM(UTC)
Well, if there's EVER a good time that Nelson is hurting, i guess it's now. I'd keep him activated, in CASE we need him. But sit him if at all possible.
Give's Boykin a chance to show what he can do.
If he's anything like he was in the preseason, he could be a big lift.
It gives the kid a chance to show, without having to play against the best D in the league. Get his feet wet, you might say.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
gbguy20 (1h) : Bmarsh cut. preparing for obj extension?
Zero2Cool (3h) : Week 1: at Packers — Sept. 9 (SNF)
Cheesey (4h) : I don't know. I don't have HBO. I only have regular BO.
Smokey (9h) : Who is HBO's 2018 "Hard Knocks" team ?
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on choosing Packers -- Why Green Bay instead of New Orleans? "#12 is hungry
DarkaneRules (17-Apr) : When he talked about missing guys he didn't mentioned Greg Jennings :)
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : it won't though. thus, off-season = hate season
gbguy20 (17-Apr) : these quotes from arod should shut people up
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on whether he's still the same Jimmy Graham: "I'm still 6-foot-7 and still run a 4.55 (40)."
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : TE Jimmy Graham said he turned down a lot of money to sign with a team he said he feels can win it all. “12 is hungry,” he said.
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Aaron Rodgers on potential extension with Packers: "There's interest on both sides in getting something done"
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "You have to trust the process. And the process works." Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : I think Barkley would be crazy good with Aaron Rodgers.
porky88 (15-Apr) : If the Packers trade into the top 10, I think it's for Saquan Barkley.
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Lololol
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Need to use this statement "The Packers have wasted enough years of AR's career"
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : New GM with a new qb. History repeats.
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : I had that fuck that idea about Rodgers..turns out I was wrong.
gbguy20 (14-Apr) : fuck that idea.
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : Rosen?
Nonstopdrivel (14-Apr) : An unnamed source told Daniel Jeremiah the Packers will trade into the top ten to snag a quarterback.
Zero2Cool (13-Apr) : The #Cowboys have released WR Dez Bryant, source said. It’s done.
Zero2Cool (13-Apr) : Sources: Cowboys expected to release Bryant The Cowboys, who are meeting with Dez Bryant on Friday, plan on "moving on" and release the star receiver, sources told ESPN
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Today's Birthdays: ThePrey (29)
Nonstopdrivel (11-Apr) : I'm easily offended.
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : but, if you're easily offended, stay the hell out
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : for some good laughs, read Let's Offend Everyone! in The Back Alley
gbguy20 (11-Apr) : give him a prove it deal here for that money. ridiculous
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : I think he wanted a prove it year, to cash in next season.
Nonstopdrivel (9-Apr) : Detail in Patriots' deal with WR Jordan Matthews shows the bargain: one-year, $1 million, plus $700K in incentives. Only $170K is guaranteed.
Porforis (9-Apr) : You're my favorite customer.
Nonstopdrivel (9-Apr) : Oh, hi, Mark.
TheKanataThrilla (8-Apr) : I like our current RBs. If we have an injury or 2 maybe sign Lacy on a cheap 1 year deal.
Porforis (8-Apr) : In Round 2? Heck no. Later rounds? Sure why not.
Nonstopdrivel (8-Apr) : Bucky Brooks has Green Bay taking Rashaad Penny in Round 2. Do the Packers really need another running back?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

15-Apr / Around The NFL / Cheesey

14-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

Headlines