Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
10 Pages«<34567>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline dhazer  
#41 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:25:54 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2016Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 100
Applause Received: 338
I say we trade Jennings to KC for Bowe, granted Bowe wants a new contract but do we pay an older injury prone wr looking for the big bucks or do we sign a big wr that will want good money but is younger than Jennings. I know Ted Thompson wouldn't do anything like that but that would be so awesome having the big huge WR to go along with Jones, Cobb, and Nelson. Hell send KC Finley also lol
Offline Porforis  
#42 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 11:24:22 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 347
Applause Received: 645
wrolly said: Go to Quoted Post
Can' do it. Especially with the injury issues for Jennings. Jones is the number one receiver this week with Nelson injured too. We are fine with sub-par running backs.


The problem with our offensive line, not so much our RBs. Benson had (some) success because he was exceptional. A good or average RB won't have much of any success with the line consistently being pushed in his face.
Offline yooperfan  
#43 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 1:23:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,644
Applause Received: 657
He would retire rather than try to run behind this offensive line.
Offline zombieslayer  
#44 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 1:44:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
I'd rather have a QB in the postseason than a running back... you're gonna face more explosive teams and stouter defenses. You'll find yourself down if you rely on running the ball. You think your RB can bring yourself back down 20? I don't think so.. I'd say 2 teams won the SB without a great qb in the last decade, 3 if you count that horrid game by Big Ben in 05' I'll take those odds...


History shows that in order, the most important things in the postseason are:
1) D
2) QB


RB isn't even on the list. But then again, Vikesrule is a Vikings fan and the Vikings are completely clueless to what it takes to win in the postseason. :-"
thanks Post received 3 applause.
yooperfan on 10/28/2012(UTC), wpr on 10/28/2012(UTC), Gaycandybacon on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#45 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:00:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
History shows that in order, the most important things in the postseason are:
1) D
2) QB


RB isn't even on the list. But then again, Vikesrule is a Vikings fan and the Vikings are completely clueless to what it takes to win in the postseason. :-"


FLIP FLOP THOSE! NOW! :)
Offline rabidgopher04  
#46 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:37:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 135
Applause Received: 163
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
FLIP FLOP THOSE! NOW! :)


2000 Baltimore Ravens. Outstanding D, Trent Dilfer as QB, Super Bowl champs. D is number one. QB was irrelevant in this case.
Offline RajiRoar  
#47 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 11:38:07 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 51
Applause Received: 372
for the record, I am not part of the "we need an elite RB crowd".

would it be nice to steal one undrafted? OF COURSE!

but we need a PRODUCTIVE RB, Green is not getting it done.

IMO anyone who is not upset about our running production has gotten too used to the crap we've had for the last 6(?) years, (Grant's 8-game stretch in 07' excluded). or is starting to believe MM's spin doctoring on what a RB is for.

or maybe im just bitter because I hated Green as a draft prospect.

is Jackson a long term answer? no.

is Benson? no.

we will be dafting one anyway and if Brandon Jackson(2nd), Starks(6th), and Green(4th) are any indication, Ted Thompson doesnt have much of an eye for RBs.

why not just use the pick now instead of waiting for the draft?
Offline nerdmann  
#48 Posted : Monday, October 29, 2012 12:34:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,416
Applause Received: 1,424
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
for the record, I am not part of the "we need an elite RB crowd".

would it be nice to steal one undrafted? OF COURSE!

but we need a PRODUCTIVE RB, Green is not getting it done.

IMO anyone who is not upset about our running production has gotten too used to the crap we've had for the last 6(?) years, (Grant's 8-game stretch in 07' excluded). or is starting to believe MM's spin doctoring on what a RB is for.

or maybe im just bitter because I hated Green as a draft prospect.

is Jackson a long term answer? no.

is Benson? no.

we will be dafting one anyway and if Brandon Jackson(2nd), Starks(6th), and Green(4th) are any indication, Ted Thompson doesnt have much of an eye for RBs.

why not just use the pick now instead of waiting for the draft?


My beef isn't that Green sucks. It's that we're not utilizing his skill set.

This is a dude who's Cobb-like in the open field, but all we wanna do is bam him into the pile.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#49 Posted : Monday, October 29, 2012 1:04:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
rabidgopher04 said: Go to Quoted Post
2000 Baltimore Ravens. Outstanding D, Trent Dilfer as QB, Super Bowl champs. D is number one. QB was irrelevant in this case.


Still QB>D

You'll rarely see soley a Defense win a Championship.

I don't understand the whole defense wins championships thing. Cause last time I checked your offense scores the most points not the defense. And if you don't have a QB it's gonna be tough. I still like the odds with a QB.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#50 Posted : Monday, October 29, 2012 8:14:48 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Still QB>D

You'll rarely see soley a Defense win a Championship.

I don't understand the whole defense wins championships thing. Cause last time I checked your offense scores the most points not the defense. And if you don't have a QB it's gonna be tough. I still like the odds with a QB.


The reason for the saying is because when you get to the play offs you normally end up with good and closely matched offenses, and defense makes the difference.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
10 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
beast (29m) : We shouldn't judge. ..
uffda udfa (42m) : He has a rep for keen football intelligence. Some guys just don't come across as bright.
uffda udfa (45m) : What thing should we judge intelligence on? Wonderlic is out to you. How he sounds is out.. what is criteria?
uffda udfa (45m) : Are you taking issue with him not being particularly bright? Based on what?
beast (50m) : It's sad your judging a person brightness on such shallow things...
shield4life (10h) : Resign Nick Perry
uffda udfa (14h) : Need some strong sharp passionate voices on D. Daniels gives great quotes.
uffda udfa (14h) : Nick Perry seems to be the team leader as he was giving pregame speeches that seemed very uninspiring.
uffda udfa (14h) : Morgan and his 14 wonderlic. Ever hear him talk? Man, not a bright guy at all.
uffda udfa (14h) : Burnett needs to be replaced. That's our leader? Or one of them? No, thanks.
beast (15h) : For the secondary, I think Burnett/Haha are the leaders.
Smokey (16h) : GB needs a new motto : DEFENSE RULES ! , is intended to change the direction of the Packers focus moving forward .
Smokey (16h) : Thank You Zero.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Great reading a thread and seeing "defense rules" spammed in them all. Great reading material.
Smokey (16h) : DEFENSE RULES !
Zero2Cool (17h) : Think you need to defensive leaders. Front Seven and Secondary. We seem to lack both. Daniels is closest.
beast (17h) : Packers players had a right to complain when they were being bullied by Mike Daniels... just talking about Packers ;-) jk
Zero2Cool (17h) : It was the 26th largest margin since 1940. Feels much worse
Zero2Cool (17h) : thought it was biggest margin of victory in Conf Championship, I was mistaken.
Smokey (19h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (19h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (20h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (21h) : go pack go ?
wpr (21h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (21h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (21h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (21h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (21h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (22h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (22h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (22h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (23h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (23h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (23-Jan) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (23-Jan) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Football Familiarity / mojaveson

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

18h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04


Packers Headlines