Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online steveishere  
#16 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 2:46:08 PM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 51
Applause Received: 1,109
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
So, this team never shits itself on a regular basis, its just a one time fluke because we had all these guys sitting out?


Yeah, they've shat themselves on a regular basis into the 2nd most wins in the league since McCarthy became the coach. How terrible...

[wallme]
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/28/2012(UTC), Gaycandybacon on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline dyeah_gb  
#17 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:12:10 PM(UTC)
dyeah_gb

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 39
Applause Received: 45
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
There is absolutely no common sense thinking that says injuries didn't play a factor into the Packers ONLY winning by 9 points. I think we should piss and moan about the loss because wins come so easy, ahem 49ers, Colts, Seahawks games for examples.

No team has EVER played a perfect game, none, not one, never. The OL was garbage and the DL didn't get the upper hand more times than not and tackling was an issue.

I, for one, am happy they won. It's not easy to do when you're missing your two starting WR, missing a Charles Woodson, on your 3rd ILB starting, your starting RB. It's a win and hopefully there were no more injuries. I'm tired of losing starters to injuries. This injury list is worse than 2010! Insane!


I am happy with the win. Today's game just brought bad flashbacks to the loss to a mediocre colts team. The mistakes I saw had nothing to do with injured players. It was a cascading group of errors that that could have spiraled out of control. Against a decent opponent, the multitude of mistakes in the end of the 2nd and 3rd quarter would have more likely cost us the game.
Offline doddpower  
#18 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:28:10 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,326
Applause Received: 583
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
We need to get more creative on offense and feed Cobb the ball at every opportunity. We also need a change of pace back. I have concerns about line play particularly the effectiveness of Saturday.


Yeah, Green isn't that good, but the offensive line blocking is terrible as well as has been for years, for the most part.

Offline nerdmann  
#19 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:35:56 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,144
Applause Received: 772
doddpower said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Green isn't that good, but the offensive line blocking is terrible as well as has been for years, for the most part.



I don't know why they do not use him in such a manner as to take advantage of his skill set.

Screens, for instance. Draws and flat passes. Traps. Get him in the open field. Not only is that stuff he's actually GOOD AT, but it would fit into the overall "passing" philosophy of the offense.

I guess it's because of the perception that we have to have a certain number of "rushing attempts" to "keep defenses honest." Well that's great. Use Starks for that. Or at least give Green something to do that he can actually get done. It's like substiting your league MVP quarterback on a fourth down passing attempt.

Oh wait, they did that too. lolThink
Offline wpr  
#20 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:40:10 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,285
Applause Received: 1,586
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
We won a SB with more injuries, so injuries aren't a valid excuse.

This Jags team is HORRIBLE. There was absolutely no reason we couldn't cover the spread.


That is easy. Mike doesn't bet on the games so he doesn't care if they win by 2 or by 20. He just wants the W. As soon as the win loss is based on the spread he will care.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:56:20 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
That is easy. Mike doesn't bet on the games so he doesn't care if they win by 2 or by 20. He just wants the W. As soon as the win loss is based on the spread he will care.


That there is the problem with some fans. They go into games feeling it should absolutely be a blow out and when it doesn't happen, the sky is falling. Even when their rooting team ... wins. [palm]
thanks Post received 1 applause.
rabidgopher04 on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 4:03:03 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 304
MORE STARKS

MORE

STARKS
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 4:43:58 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
That there is the problem with some fans. They go into games feeling it should absolutely be a blow out and when it doesn't happen, the sky is falling. Even when their rooting team ... wins. [palm]


Problem? Or a legitimate concern?

Remember people were saying "oh, don't worry about the defense" in 2011. What happened?

This year, our O is lacking that killer instinct. Hope we get this resolved in time for the Playoffs.

Of course, you can bury your head and the sand and believe everything will be OK. I guess that's the American way nowadays.
Offline vikesrule  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 4:51:08 PM(UTC)
vikesrule

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post

Remember people were saying "oh, don't worry about the defense" in 2011. What happened?


People?

What people ZS?

[roflmao]

Online steveishere  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 5:01:51 PM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 51
Applause Received: 1,109
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Problem? Or a legitimate concern?

Remember people were saying "oh, don't worry about the defense" in 2011. What happened?

This year, our O is lacking that killer instinct. Hope we get this resolved in time for the Playoffs.

Of course, you can bury your head and the sand and believe everything will be OK. I guess that's the American way nowadays.


In 2011 they were winning despite a bad defense. They still have had one of the top offenses in the league this year so far despite facing one of the toughest defensive schedules of anybody. I don't see how not being panicky equates to "burying your head in the sand" in this situation.
Offline zombieslayer  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 5:01:59 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
People?

What people ZS?

[roflmao]



Yes, myself included. I'll readily admit that. But I guarantee you, I was in the majority last year. There were only a few people (Nonstopdrivel immediately comes to mind) who brought up the concerns about the D when it came time for the Playoffs.
Offline RaiderPride  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 6:03:05 PM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 156
Applause Received: 236
Good teams win in what some fans bitch about and consider a loathsome and ugly performance.

However... On December 16th this year, at exactly 1 P.M. EST. The final score of today's game will not mean shit. The only thing that will matter is the number that was placed in the win column today, this fine Sunday, October 28, 2012.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline mi_keys  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 6:07:32 PM(UTC)
mi_keys

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 260
Applause Received: 397
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
In 2011 they were winning despite a bad defense. They still have had one of the top offenses in the league this year so far despite facing one of the toughest defensive schedules of anybody. I don't see how not being panicky equates to "burying your head in the sand" in this situation.


This. Our offense also played lights out the last two weeks against some pretty damn good defenses on the road. Our defense never had a lights out game last year, let alone against a good offense.

Today's game was certainly frustrating. That said, how many teams are playing without their top two wideouts and their starting running back. It wasn't a good performance but we won. Sometimes wins are going to be ugly. Let's hope they snap out of it next week and play the way they did against the Rams and Texans.
Offline zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 6:30:22 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
RaiderPride said: Go to Quoted Post
Good teams win in what some fans bitch about and consider a loathsome and ugly performance.

However... On December 16th this year, at exactly 1 P.M. EST. The final score of today's game will not mean shit. The only thing that will matter is the number that was placed in the win column today, this fine Sunday, October 28, 2012.



Wait. What does Beethoven's birthday have to do with the Packers? Think
thanks Post received 1 applause.
RaiderPride on 10/28/2012(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 6:37:39 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 304
Seriously, is Starks still gimpy? If not, why the hell is he being ignored for this guy Alex Green who can't do a damn thing?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
20m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest


Tweeter