Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages«<2345>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#31 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:02:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,419
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Seriously, is Starks still gimpy? If not, why the hell is he being ignored for this guy Alex Green who can't do a damn thing?


The QB doesn't like him.
Offline dyeah_gb  
#32 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:06:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 61
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Seriously, is Starks still gimpy? If not, why the hell is he being ignored for this guy Alex Green who can't do a damn thing?


I am under the impression it is a maturity thing. Like the rookie mistake of dropping the pass on the screen in the second half because he was turning to run up field before he had control of the ball.

Offline gbguy20  
#33 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:36:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 463
Applause Received: 497
Still, how many games in a row are we going to run for 2 yards per carry before we decide it's time to give someone else a shot?
Offline Wade  
#34 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:38:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
It isn't the RB that is the problem.

It's the OL.

Again.

Still.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/29/2012(UTC)
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#35 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:54:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
When will you guys realize no matter what back we put out there it won't change the running game.... I'm sorry but i'm tired of hearing about it. Our starting FB was out for god sakes and we ran more yards than last week....granted a better defense but still...

Alex Green is not the problem and Starks isn't the answer. Our WHOLE team is accountable ladies and gents.

Like everyone said no game is easy to win in the NFL. AND WE WON. Don't underestmate any team.. And I think it's lauaghable everyone thinks we play down to bad competition. EVERYONES COMPETITION! IT'S THE NFL...

One bright spot in this game.. We were balanced. Arod didn't throw a pick and threw 2 TDs.. He did enough..

I believe injuries hurt us today. But we hurt ourselves a couple times and we need to improve like anyone else.



All in all.. I'll continue to say this.. No matter the yards, IF we run the ball 20 + times WE WILL WIN! The proofs in the pudding. 20+ Carries = 5-1. Guess what the loss was? The Seahawks! which in essence we're 6-0 when we acomplish that feet.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
RaiderPride on 10/28/2012(UTC), Zero2Cool on 10/29/2012(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#36 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:55:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
It isn't the RB that is the problem.

It's the OL.

Again.

Still.


There is no "the" problem. There are problemS and the RB is part of it.
Offline zombieslayer  
#37 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:00:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
When will you guys realize no matter what back we put out there it won't change the running game.... I'm sorry but i'm tired of hearing about it. Our starting FB was out for god sakes and we ran more yards than last week....granted a better defense but still...

Alex Green is not the problem and Starks isn't the answer. Our WHOLE team is accountable ladies and gents.

Like everyone said no game is easy to win in the NFL. AND WE WON. Don't underestmate any team.. And I think it's lauaghable everyone thinks we play down to competition. EVERYONES COMPETITION! IT'S THE NFL...

One bright spot in this game.. We were balanced. Arod didn't throw a pick and threw 2 TDs.. He did enough..

I believe injuries hurt us today. But we hurt ourselves a couple times and we need to improve like anyone else.



All in all.. I'll continue to say this.. No matter the yards, IF we run the ball 20 + times WE WILL WIN! The proofs in the pudding. 20+ Carries = 5-1. Guess what the loss was? The Seahawks! which in essence we're 6-0 when we acomplish that feet.


For the record, historically, total yards doesn't matter. Total carries does. We're getting the carries and Alex Green has proven he's tough enough to run 20+ times a game.

So....we found our RB. Bonus he's decent with screens.
Offline earthquake  
#38 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:16:37 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 520
Applause Received: 170
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
For the record, historically, total yards doesn't matter. Total carries does. We're getting the carries and Alex Green has proven he's tough enough to run 20+ times a game.

So....we found our RB. Bonus he's decent with screens.


Honestly I think this is a bit of a chicken-and-egg stat.

Teams that win or teams that lead tend to run the ball at the end of games more than throw it, to run out the clock. Teams that lose or are trailing will pass the ball more and abandon the run game. So its fairly logical that you will have more carries in a winning effort, that doesn't mean more carries is the way to win necessarily.
Offline zombieslayer  
#39 Posted : Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:22:04 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
earthquake said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly I think this is a bit of a chicken-and-egg stat.

Teams that win or teams that lead tend to run the ball at the end of games more than throw it, to run out the clock. Teams that lose or are trailing will pass the ball more and abandon the run game. So its fairly logical that you will have more carries in a winning effort, that doesn't mean more carries is the way to win necessarily.


:-$

Don't say that too loud or else you'll have the pro-run people hound you.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#40 Posted : Monday, October 29, 2012 12:54:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
earthquake said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly I think this is a bit of a chicken-and-egg stat.

Teams that win or teams that lead tend to run the ball at the end of games more than throw it, to run out the clock. Teams that lose or are trailing will pass the ball more and abandon the run game. So its fairly logical that you will have more carries in a winning effort, that doesn't mean more carries is the way to win necessarily.


I won't disagree that RB attempts decide games. But a high number of carries are important if you wanna control the clock the whole game. Remember the 49ers game and the 2nd half of the Colts game, where we didn't run it more than 10 times. The 9ers/Colts stomped us cause they kept us off the field. And if we got a 3 and out 1 or 2 times strictly passing the ball it can kill you and bite you in the ass. That's why if we get those number of carries our team will have better success. Just the fact we have faith running the ball that much is encouraging even thoe we don't put up the yards. At least Mike McCarthy has been consistant with that the last 3 games.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
5 Pages«<2345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (2h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (2h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (2h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (2h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (2h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (7h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (7h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (7h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (7h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (7h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (7h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (8h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (8h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (8h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (8h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (8h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (11h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (12h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (14h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Zero2Cool (14h) : keep trying to diminish what the Packers have done and ...
Zero2Cool (14h) : one... that's just how it goes. They let the players play. But go ahead
Zero2Cool (14h) : Everyone knows on the hail mary type passes, those little shoves won't be called. Think replacement refs 2012. So, no did not get away with
Dulak (14h) : ya I think they mentioned that U U ... but you see this alot - even in the dallas game they pushed off at least 1 time (they as in dallas)
uffda udfa (20h) : Just rewatched Cobbs hail mary catch in slo mo...he should've been flagged for OPI. Got away with one.
uffda udfa (23h) : Nope. I like Gus.
beast (23h) : Did you want Anthony Lynn as HC? Cushion Bradley was going to follow Lynn where ever.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Gus Bradley is new DC in SD/LA. I would've loved to had him here in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : It's just fine.
musccy (21-Jan) : 5 questionable Packers, none for Falcons. Not good.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Jordy not listed as OUT or DOUBTFUL. Questionable on injury report.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : This is the 6th straight game we've faced someone for the 2nd time. We learn.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / rabidgopher04

19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines