Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:04:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
OK, this part of the article I don't understand. Not the author, but the play selection.

If we're having so much trouble running left, why are half the plays to the left? Why not run more right up the middle and to the right?


I think much of the reason is the plays from shotgun, how Rodgers likes to hand the ball off and fake. When the back is coming from his right, running left. When Rodgers would come out of a fake, he would have his body turning in the same direction as his normal drop.
Offline beast  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:25:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 571
Applause Received: 708
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Well technically every scheme is a zone scheme of some sort. But the zone Mike brought in, the Outside Zone from Denver. We don't block well, and have never blocked well. And it is predominately LOS blocking, hoping for a lane to open up from a cut block or over pursuit of the defense.

There has been a switch to inside zone, with Benson and lately when we do run up the middle not from shotgun.



I disagree every scheme is a zone scheme... power scheme the Packers ran in the early 2000 with William Henderson clearly wasn't a zone scheme, it was a hat on a hat, beat your guy down...

And the Packers have run zone blocking where is wasn't LOS blocking, I remember in the NFL opener against the Saints, the Packers were able to run the ball at times very well, and people were so glad, it was working and they brought back the power blocking.... well it wasn't power blocking it was it was zone blocking and getting to the second level (my favorite type). Also you can have outside zone up the field as well. I think up the field outside zone would work best for RB Green. Speed RB who's doesn't have the best power or reading of blocks.

I agree with you that I have never liked the look of the LOS zone blocking, but if you can hold the rusher, then get the moving, and just one guy stop the movement of his guy, huge holes can open up. you have to be willing to go hit a guy around his knee though at times...



Up the field zone, is based on starting with a double team, say Lang and Saturday, going towards Lang way, the double team the NT, with Lang in the better position, then they put a quick switch, where Saturday gets into the better position, as Lang is leaving the NT and going to the second level and getting him a LB to block...

So Saturday has to hold the NT a short while one on one, but the RB should be through that hole soon, and Lang is up the field. Clearly you have to have quick linemen for that, which is where the idea of zone linemen have to be smaller.... which isn't true. They have to be quick... they're not always the easiest to find, but big quick linemen can work great too (Bulaga)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:46:26 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree every scheme is a zone scheme... power scheme the Packers ran in the early 2000 with William Henderson clearly wasn't a zone scheme, it was a hat on a hat, beat your guy down...

And the Packers have run zone blocking where is wasn't LOS blocking, I remember in the NFL opener against the Saints, the Packers were able to run the ball at times very well, and people were so glad, it was working and they brought back the power blocking.... well it wasn't power blocking it was it was zone blocking and getting to the second level (my favorite type). Also you can have outside zone up the field as well. I think up the field outside zone would work best for RB Green. Speed RB who's doesn't have the best power or reading of blocks.

I agree with you that I have never liked the look of the LOS zone blocking, but if you can hold the rusher, then get the moving, and just one guy stop the movement of his guy, huge holes can open up. you have to be willing to go hit a guy around his knee though at times...



Up the field zone, is based on starting with a double team, say Lang and Saturday, going towards Lang way, the double team the NT, with Lang in the better position, then they put a quick switch, where Saturday gets into the better position, as Lang is leaving the NT and going to the second level and getting him a LB to block...

So Saturday has to hold the NT a short while one on one, but the RB should be through that hole soon, and Lang is up the field. Clearly you have to have quick linemen for that, which is where the idea of zone linemen have to be smaller.... which isn't true. They have to be quick... they're not always the easiest to find, but big quick linemen can work great too (Bulaga)


Even "hat on hat" is still zone, once past HS even in HS more these days. Many call it rules blocking, but in essence it is still the same. Whether inside or outside, a lineman has a zone to block, and rules determine who to block. Defenses move around and change to much to not block zones. Depending where the defense lines up, determines blocking assignment. Saturday would either block the NT over him, or if uncovered, doubling left or right depending on the play. Only real difference, is the blocking momentum forward or sideways.

Even on pulling plays, LG pulls right, his zone is the first guy not blocked on the end of the line
Offline beast  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:06:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 571
Applause Received: 708
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Even "hat on hat" is still zone, once past HS even in HS more these days. Many call it rules blocking, but in essence it is still the same. Whether inside or outside, a lineman has a zone to block, and rules determine who to block. Defenses move around and change to much to not block zones. Depending where the defense lines up, determines blocking assignment. Saturday would either block the NT over him, or if uncovered, doubling left or right depending on the play. Only real difference, is the blocking momentum forward or sideways.

Even on pulling plays, LG pulls right, his zone is the first guy not blocked on the end of the line


I'm not used to "hat on hat" being zone, to me it's man. Sounds like they're putting it in zone terms but it's still man... hit the first guy in your way, that's uncovered at you pull.
Offline nerdmann  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, October 30, 2012 4:46:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,413
Applause Received: 1,424
Lang's been playing one handed due to an elbow injury. And Newhouse is a backup.

Interesting article. Thanks for posting it.

Still seems like dude could have a little better vision though. AND I think they could use him better toward his skill set.

But I guess I'm not as down on him as I was before. I thought Green played with some heart in the last game.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (1h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (1h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (1h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (1h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (1h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (1h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (1h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (1h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (1h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (1h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (1h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (1h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
uffda udfa (1h) : Mike Pereira explained on Twitter what he should've on FOX.
Smokey (1h) : Keeping them thread separated is the key. Fan Shout is for any and all members to post as they please. No one voted you King U2 .
uffda udfa (1h) : This is for NFL stuff. Not crock pots or crack pots.
uffda udfa (1h) : Shout is not back alley. Not your forum either.
Smokey (1h) : Cooking, or travel, or our favorite movie have every right in this forum.
Smokey (1h) : It is not, YOUR FORUM . Even politics is tolerated in the Back Ally .
uffda udfa (1h) : I love cooking but this is a Packers forum not Iron Chef.
Smokey (1h) : Anyone, man or woman, that can cook does not need to always depend upon others to cook their food for them.
Smokey (1h) : The greater majority of successful restaurants are owned/and run by Men.
Smokey (2h) : Making fun of the art of cooking only demonstrates a lack of sophistication.
Smokey (2h) : Most of the finest chefs in the world are men.
hardrocker950 (3h) : lol
uffda udfa (3h) : Best pressure cooker talk on the net!
hardrocker950 (4h) : Time to get the CB situation sorted out
Smokey (5h) : DON'T DELAY, JOIN TODAY !
musccy (7h) : Sorry, but no to shields. 9 mil better spent elsewhere.
uffda udfa (7h) : Sam Shields still having headaches but wants to continue playing.
uffda udfa (7h) : Not harsh. Another failure and playoff embarrassment.
uffda udfa (7h) : Aaron cried a little when asked about Jordy playing today.
GoPack1984 (8h) : Dismal season? I think that's too harsh.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

1h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Announcements / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson


Packers Headlines