Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline doddpower  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:15:08 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,417
Applause Received: 941
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Atlanta at 1, Chicago at 2 and an NFC East opponent at 3 hosting the Packers in the wild card round... where have we seen that before?

I'd be totally fine with the final seeds mirroring the current standings.

And 3 teams from the NFC North in the playoffs? At the start of the year that would not have surprised me at all. I just would have swapped Detroit and Minnesota.


Three teams is the case for now, but I expect the Vikings to fall in the standings quickly in the coming weeks.

Offline zombieslayer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:11:58 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
as it stands now 3 teams from the north get in, who saw that coming?


I think we all did, but we saw the 3 teams as us, da Bears, and the Lions.

By the end of the season though, we all know what's gonna happen to that 4th team. So that leaves 2 from the NFC North.
Online gbguy20  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:40:44 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 460
Applause Received: 495
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I think we all did, but we saw the 3 teams as us, da Bears, and the Lions.

By the end of the season though, we all know what's gonna happen to that 4th team. So that leaves 2 from the NFC North.


oh right, that is what i meant i suppose
Offline beast  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:59:01 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 564
Applause Received: 701
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
as it stands now 3 teams from the north get in, who saw that coming?


I was guessing it. Last year it looked like 6 teams from the north might get into the playoffs (3 from AFC North, 3 from NFC North). The 3 from the AFC North made it in. 2 from the NFC North did, with the Bears injuring their top 2 QB, top 2 RBs, top WR and top run blocking OL, their offense disappeared.

Also the Lions made it in, but fell to 6 seed after losing their best 2 DBs (which was already a weakness) and losing to the Packers back-ups as they rested some of their starters including Rodgers.

So I thought if healthy, the Packers, Bears and Lions might make another run at getting 3 in. The Lions still missing their top Safety (maybe done for the year) and their QB not looking the same aren't looking as good, nether has their DL. But the Vikings have been beating some good teams and staying in it.
Offline mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:09:09 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 350
Applause Received: 612
doddpower said: Go to Quoted Post
Three teams is the case for now, but I expect the Vikings to fall in the standings quickly in the coming weeks.



I do too. I see them as 8-8/9-7 and just a little bit short of the playoffs come the end of the year. They are certainly capable of playing with some good teams on their day. They've played woeful at times as well in their three losses (none of which were to particularly good teams... yes I know that includes the Colts) and they were even more embarrisingly bad against the Jags than we were.

Still, it's not outside the realm of possibility that they could sneak in.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:21:12 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 947
As of now, I would predict.

Atlanta #1 15-1 or 14-2 with loses to Gmen and either Det/TB. With the schedul they have remaining, undefeated is not unrealistic.
SF #2 13-3 losing at NE
Pack #3 13-3 I'm assuming we win out.
Gmen #4 12-4 losing to Pitt and Us.
Bears #5 12-4 losing to Hou, SF and Us
Sea #6 10-6 losing to Chi and SF

That would give us a rematch against Seattle in GB. No hail mary this time.

I could also see gmen at 3 and us at 4 losing in NY.
Offline Porforis  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:28:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 336
Applause Received: 639
I really don't see us winning out. I'd bank on 12-4 or 11-5.
Offline beast  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:08:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 564
Applause Received: 701
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
As of now, I would predict.

Atlanta #1 15-1 or 14-2 with loses to Gmen and either Det/TB. With the schedul they have remaining, undefeated is not unrealistic.
SF #2 13-3 losing at NE
Pack #3 13-3 I'm assuming we win out.
Gmen #4 12-4 losing to Pitt and Us.
Bears #5 12-4 losing to Hou, SF and Us
Sea #6 10-6 losing to Chi and SF

That would give us a rematch against Seattle in GB. No hail mary this time.

I could also see gmen at 3 and us at 4 losing in NY.


Interesting you got the Seahawks coming to GB for a rematch =d> ... the Packers playoff record at home the last 10 years or so hasn't been too good.... other than against the Seahawks [grin1] ... and if the Packers won then a rematch @ 49ers...

Yeah I was looking at the Falcons schedule, they could go 16-0 if they get past the Giants. (but I'm going to say 15-1 because I don't want any team to be undefeated)

I'm thinking the 49ers and Packers lose 2 more (than current)

Atlanta 15-1
Bears 13-3
Giants 12-4
SF 12-4
Packers 11-5 (or maybe 12-4)
Eagles 10-6 (or Cowboys 10-6)

I feel like the Eagles and Cowboys have the easiest schedule to make it in of all the 4 lose teams. Cards, Seahawks, Lions, Bucs, Eagles, Cowboys.

I'm not looking forward to seeing the 49ers or Giants in the playoffs... but if the Packers beat them... then they'll have the Falcons or Bears to deal with (and Packers took care of them last go around in the playoffs)
Online gbguy20  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:57:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 460
Applause Received: 495
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Interesting you got the Seahawks coming to GB for a rematch =d> ... the Packers playoff record at home the last 10 years or so hasn't been too good.... other than against the Seahawks [grin1] ... and if the Packers won then a rematch @ 49ers...

Yeah I was looking at the Falcons schedule, they could go 16-0 if they get past the Giants. (but I'm going to say 15-1 because I don't want any team to be undefeated)

I'm thinking the 49ers and Packers lose 2 more (than current)

Atlanta 15-1
Bears 13-3
Giants 12-4
SF 12-4
Packers 11-5 (or maybe 12-4)
Eagles 10-6 (or Cowboys 10-6)

I feel like the Eagles and Cowboys have the easiest schedule to make it in of all the 4 lose teams. Cards, Seahawks, Lions, Bucs, Eagles, Cowboys.

I'm not looking forward to seeing the 49ers or Giants in the playoffs... but if the Packers beat them... then they'll have the Falcons or Bears to deal with (and Packers took care of them last go around in the playoffs)


luckily the seahawks fucking suck so we can get a win at home this post season
Offline Rockmolder  
#20 Posted : Thursday, November 1, 2012 3:33:37 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 384
Philbin's 4-3 with a rookie QB/Back up QB, a right side of the O-line that's borderline horrendous most of the time and a receiving core where Driver could most likely be a starter...

Obviously, defense is their strongest point (which is impressive, as well, seeing as they traded away their starting CB and they've made a 3-4 to 4-3 switch), but the offense isn't turning it over or sputtering that badly at all.

Next to that, from the 3 games they've lost, they lost two by just three points. One of those losses came against the Jets... Who they demolished this week.

I don't know if they'll make the play-offs, as I'm already seeing 4 near-certain losses on the rest of their schedule and a team like this might just implode halfway trough their season, but so far, it's been pretty good.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (9m) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (47m) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (2h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (7h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (9h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (10h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (10h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (10h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (11h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (11h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (16h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (16h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (17h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (21h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (21h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (21h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (21h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (21h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (22h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (22h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (22h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (22h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (22h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (22h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (22h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

5h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Around The NFL / Smokey


Packers Headlines