Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
5 Pages«<2345>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#61 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:43:20 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
6-3 going into the bye. We've got a week to get a few guys healthy and make a push over the 2nd half. Let's do this.


I had $10 on the Packers +8. NAILED IT!
gbguy20  
#62 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:48:41 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I had $10 on the Packers +8. NAILED IT!


Miami fucked me at -1.

just threw 10 into a parlay bet on the gints, saints, and falcons all at their respective spreads

it's whatever
dfosterf  
#63 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:49:43 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Enjoy the game with your son Wayne.

Hope you gave your dog that bone, cause the Cardinals are pissed off with 4 straight losses and won't be throwing any bones Green Bay's way.



Cardinals by 9...Packers go into the bye at 5-4.




What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.

zombieslayer  
#64 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:56:38 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.



Word to the wise - if you want to make money betting, find out which way Vikesrule bets, and do the opposite. [grin1]
zombieslayer  
#65 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:59:10 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
On the DL Mike Neal really blew some guys up today. Reminded me of the Cullen Jenkins years


Yeah, Neal played like Jenkins. Good game by Neal. Got a good sack + some pressures.
dfosterf  
#66 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:01:04 PM(UTC)
In fairness to Nick, I'd be remiss if I failed to mention that betting against me also seems to work quite well, I've been told, lol


beast  
#67 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:28:55 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.


I think he did a great choice of predicting the game... just he channeled the wrong game... which is easy to do when you consider all the team bird names, and that he's a Viking fan on a Packers board...

I'm sure this is what he meant... and he was only one point off...

vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Enjoy the game with your son Wayne.

Hope you gave your dog that bone, cause the Seahawks are pissed off with 2 straight losses and won't be throwing any bones Minnesota's way.



Seahawks by 9...Vikings go into the bye at 5-4.


doddpower  
#68 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:57:01 PM(UTC)
Neal looked good to very good today. Had an impressive sack and stuffed a bit 3rd down and short run. For the sake of the Packers, let's hope he continues to improve!
wpr  
#69 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:45:54 PM(UTC)
got up tot he game and back again. I am so glad we got this game. GB did their tribute to our Vets. I was proud (that's FUCKING PROUD to you dfoster) that my son was with me today. I couldn't tell enough people around us that he was wounded in Afghanistan. David was patient and let me gloat although he wished I wouldn't have said anything.

UserPostedImage


UserPostedImage

vikes- in case you don't know what the display case behind us is for they hold Lombardi Trophies. There are 4 of them. Too many to get them all in the photo with us. I understand your confusion.
olds70supreme  
#70 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 7:58:54 AM(UTC)
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?
zombieslayer  
#71 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:33:39 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


To be fair to Aaron Rodgers, once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.
wpr  
#72 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:41:54 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


I kind of felt that the colder weather was somewhat a part of the problem. I blame that on Mike McCarthy. I have said it many times in the past that they practice too much inside. One day a week is enough. Get outside on the field turf and get use to the weather. Having the doors to the building open or sticking the footballs into the freezer is apparently not enough.

It almost seem to me that AZ stopped themselves with poor passing and WR drops as much the GB defense did in covering them.

GB won by 14 but I can easily see AZ getting 2 TDs if they executed better. And of course I know that GB did run the clock out at the end of the game.
olds70supreme  
#73 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:42:47 AM(UTC)
Quote:
To be fair to , once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.


True, maybe I should rephrase my comments as general positives and negatives for the team. Not necessarily assigning blame to Rodgers for the completion %, just bringing it up to show that something was a bit off in the passing game (be it Rodgers accuracy, receivers not making catches they should, or a combination of both).
Zero2Cool  
#74 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:50:31 AM(UTC)
If Aaron Rodgers tried walking on water and failed, the excuse would be it wasn't salt water so it doesn't count, lol.
wpr  
#75 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:57:02 AM(UTC)
Packerchick said: Go to Quoted Post
I am going to this game on Sunday. Going to have a good time.


PC,
I saw you on the diamondvision at the game modeling your bikini top. I don't know if it made it to the tv screen as well. You got quite a loud cheer from the guys. :-"

You give the bikini girls a run for their money.

I tried to find a photo of it on the net this morning but couldn't locate it.
TheKanataThrilla  
#76 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 9:20:04 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


The point has been raised before, but a clear negative that I saw was that they were 0-3 on 3rd and 1. I really don't know why they struggle so badly in this scenario?

As an add-on Skelton was really good. The Card receivers really helped the Pack. Lots of dropped passes at key times.
gbguy20  
#77 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 9:31:44 AM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
The point has been raised before, but a clear negative that I saw was that they were 0-3 on 3rd and 1. I really don't know why they struggle so badly in this scenario?

As an add-on Skelton was really good. The Card receivers really helped the Pack. Lots of dropped passes at key times.


Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS
PackFanWithTwins  
#78 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:21:30 AM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS


Green converted 1 3rd and 1, and was stopped on 1. Thing is, on both of them, there were unblocked men in the hole. The one he was stopped, had 2 of them. Starks wasn't going to do any better in those plays.
Pack93z  
#79 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:50:41 AM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS


When Starks has impact, mostly because of his running style, is after he has a head of steam. Throw him in a third and short with a guy sitting in the hole with his upright style.. dude gets his marbles rocked.

I said in last week and the week before that.. Green is a better runner than Starks.. what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.
Porforis  
#80 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:52:02 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.


Whoa, family website here.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages«<2345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Who the hell gives a shit about Sat/Sun now? 3rd to 7th round? F U
Zero2Cool (1h) : I thought Sat/Sun was great. You make a weekend of it. Have buddies over, cookout, etc.
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : During the afternoons I tend to get caught up in family routines. I don't mind that for the later rounds.
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : I now take Friday off work. It is a bit annoying, but I do find it fun at night as I can crack a few beers and enjoy. Sucks if they trade out of the first round though.
wpr (10h) : I liked the Sat Sun version.
beast (15h) : HELL YEAH! ... the draft was SOOOO MUCH BETTER in the ol Saturday/Sunday format... only people that I've heard disagree are those that don't really follow the draft and just random get updates on thei
beast (15h) : Key word there is "proven"... not if they're true, but if you can prove it. Jerry Jones said the same thing for Greg Hardy, it wasn't "proven".
Zero2Cool (17h) : Flat out honesty from 49ers GM
Zero2Cool (17h) : John Lynch: “if these charges are proven true, if Reuben did hit this young lady, he won’t be part of our organization moving forward.”
Smokey (17h) : 49ers / Bye Week / Rams
Zero2Cool (18h) : Brian Gutekunst: “Draft was way better when it was Saturday and Sunday.”
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : With pick #14, @CFD22 has the @Packers selecting UTSA DE Marcus Davenport.
Porforis (23-Apr) : He'll probably resort to buying and using Chicago Bears tickets.
Smokey (22-Apr) : Restrict Zero's toilet paper !
buckeyepackfan (22-Apr) : You gonna withhold your monthly dues until Zero gets the schedule posted Smokey? Lol
Smokey (22-Apr) : Zero, please post the new 2018 Packers Schedule. Thank You
Smokey (22-Apr) : DRAFT "CHAT" this Thursday night !
gbguy20 (20-Apr) : you're probably right
TheKanataThrilla (19-Apr) : I was thinking Dez gbguy20
gbguy20 (19-Apr) : Bmarsh cut. preparing for obj extension?
Zero2Cool (19-Apr) : Week 1: at Packers — Sept. 9 (SNF)
Cheesey (19-Apr) : I don't know. I don't have HBO. I only have regular BO.
Smokey (19-Apr) : Who is HBO's 2018 "Hard Knocks" team ?
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on choosing Packers -- Why Green Bay instead of New Orleans? "#12 is hungry
DarkaneRules (17-Apr) : When he talked about missing guys he didn't mentioned Greg Jennings :)
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : it won't though. thus, off-season = hate season
gbguy20 (17-Apr) : these quotes from arod should shut people up
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on whether he's still the same Jimmy Graham: "I'm still 6-foot-7 and still run a 4.55 (40)."
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : TE Jimmy Graham said he turned down a lot of money to sign with a team he said he feels can win it all. “12 is hungry,” he said.
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Aaron Rodgers on potential extension with Packers: "There's interest on both sides in getting something done"
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "You have to trust the process. And the process works." Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : I think Barkley would be crazy good with Aaron Rodgers.
porky88 (15-Apr) : If the Packers trade into the top 10, I think it's for Saquan Barkley.
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Lololol
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Need to use this statement "The Packers have wasted enough years of AR's career"
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

15-Apr / Around The NFL / Cheesey

Headlines