Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
5 Pages«<2345>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#61 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:43:20 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
6-3 going into the bye. We've got a week to get a few guys healthy and make a push over the 2nd half. Let's do this.


I had $10 on the Packers +8. NAILED IT!
gbguy20  
#62 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:48:41 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I had $10 on the Packers +8. NAILED IT!


Miami fucked me at -1.

just threw 10 into a parlay bet on the gints, saints, and falcons all at their respective spreads

it's whatever
dfosterf  
#63 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:49:43 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Enjoy the game with your son Wayne.

Hope you gave your dog that bone, cause the Cardinals are pissed off with 4 straight losses and won't be throwing any bones Green Bay's way.



Cardinals by 9...Packers go into the bye at 5-4.




What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.

zombieslayer  
#64 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:56:38 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.



Word to the wise - if you want to make money betting, find out which way Vikesrule bets, and do the opposite. [grin1]
zombieslayer  
#65 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 4:59:10 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
On the DL Mike Neal really blew some guys up today. Reminded me of the Cullen Jenkins years


Yeah, Neal played like Jenkins. Good game by Neal. Got a good sack + some pressures.
dfosterf  
#66 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:01:04 PM(UTC)
In fairness to Nick, I'd be remiss if I failed to mention that betting against me also seems to work quite well, I've been told, lol


beast  
#67 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:28:55 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
What the hell, you were close. Congrats, Nostradamus, don't quit the day job, though.


I think he did a great choice of predicting the game... just he channeled the wrong game... which is easy to do when you consider all the team bird names, and that he's a Viking fan on a Packers board...

I'm sure this is what he meant... and he was only one point off...

vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Enjoy the game with your son Wayne.

Hope you gave your dog that bone, cause the Seahawks are pissed off with 2 straight losses and won't be throwing any bones Minnesota's way.



Seahawks by 9...Vikings go into the bye at 5-4.


doddpower  
#68 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:57:01 PM(UTC)
Neal looked good to very good today. Had an impressive sack and stuffed a bit 3rd down and short run. For the sake of the Packers, let's hope he continues to improve!
wpr  
#69 Posted : Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:45:54 PM(UTC)
got up tot he game and back again. I am so glad we got this game. GB did their tribute to our Vets. I was proud (that's FUCKING PROUD to you dfoster) that my son was with me today. I couldn't tell enough people around us that he was wounded in Afghanistan. David was patient and let me gloat although he wished I wouldn't have said anything.

UserPostedImage


UserPostedImage

vikes- in case you don't know what the display case behind us is for they hold Lombardi Trophies. There are 4 of them. Too many to get them all in the photo with us. I understand your confusion.
olds70supreme  
#70 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 7:58:54 AM(UTC)
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?
zombieslayer  
#71 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:33:39 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


To be fair to Aaron Rodgers, once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.
wpr  
#72 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:41:54 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


I kind of felt that the colder weather was somewhat a part of the problem. I blame that on Mike McCarthy. I have said it many times in the past that they practice too much inside. One day a week is enough. Get outside on the field turf and get use to the weather. Having the doors to the building open or sticking the footballs into the freezer is apparently not enough.

It almost seem to me that AZ stopped themselves with poor passing and WR drops as much the GB defense did in covering them.

GB won by 14 but I can easily see AZ getting 2 TDs if they executed better. And of course I know that GB did run the clock out at the end of the game.
olds70supreme  
#73 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:42:47 AM(UTC)
Quote:
To be fair to , once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.


True, maybe I should rephrase my comments as general positives and negatives for the team. Not necessarily assigning blame to Rodgers for the completion %, just bringing it up to show that something was a bit off in the passing game (be it Rodgers accuracy, receivers not making catches they should, or a combination of both).
Zero2Cool  
#74 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:50:31 AM(UTC)
If Aaron Rodgers tried walking on water and failed, the excuse would be it wasn't salt water so it doesn't count, lol.
wpr  
#75 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 8:57:02 AM(UTC)
Packerchick said: Go to Quoted Post
I am going to this game on Sunday. Going to have a good time.


PC,
I saw you on the diamondvision at the game modeling your bikini top. I don't know if it made it to the tv screen as well. You got quite a loud cheer from the guys. :-"

You give the bikini girls a run for their money.

I tried to find a photo of it on the net this morning but couldn't locate it.
TheKanataThrilla  
#76 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 9:20:04 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
  • Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.
  • 176 rushing yards - woo hoo.
  • Mike Neal played solid.
  • 31 points and a win.


Negatives
  • Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
  • Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.


Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?


The point has been raised before, but a clear negative that I saw was that they were 0-3 on 3rd and 1. I really don't know why they struggle so badly in this scenario?

As an add-on Skelton was really good. The Card receivers really helped the Pack. Lots of dropped passes at key times.
gbguy20  
#77 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 9:31:44 AM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
The point has been raised before, but a clear negative that I saw was that they were 0-3 on 3rd and 1. I really don't know why they struggle so badly in this scenario?

As an add-on Skelton was really good. The Card receivers really helped the Pack. Lots of dropped passes at key times.


Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS
PackFanWithTwins  
#78 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:21:30 AM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS


Green converted 1 3rd and 1, and was stopped on 1. Thing is, on both of them, there were unblocked men in the hole. The one he was stopped, had 2 of them. Starks wasn't going to do any better in those plays.
Pack93z  
#79 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:50:41 AM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS


When Starks has impact, mostly because of his running style, is after he has a head of steam. Throw him in a third and short with a guy sitting in the hole with his upright style.. dude gets his marbles rocked.

I said in last week and the week before that.. Green is a better runner than Starks.. what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.
Porforis  
#80 Posted : Monday, November 5, 2012 10:52:02 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.


Whoa, family website here.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
5 Pages«<2345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : welcome back ted lol over react much? HAHAHA SIT DOWN
packerfanoutwest (7h) : go to the chat room
gbguy20 (7h) : at least stay in the teens
gbguy20 (7h) : Fucking Bullshit
Cheesey (7h) : Welcome back, Ted.
Bigbyfan (7h) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (8h) : Interesting
isocleas2 (8h) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (9h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (10h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (12h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (12h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (12h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (12h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (13h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (13h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (13h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (14h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (15h) : Packers
Smokey (15h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (15h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (15h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (15h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (15h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (15h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (15h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (18h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (18h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (19h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (19h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

13h / Random Babble / Cheesey

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines