Green Bay Packers Forum
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline doddpower  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:18:35 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
If Brian Urlacher did, I would mention a guy heals quicker in his early 20's than 30's.

Checked just now. It occurred in the regular season finale and was MCL and LCL.


Oh wow, and MCL AND an LCL? Those are the ligaments on the inside and outside of the knee. That's very interesting/odd that one injury could injure both. It's usually one or the other. Did it say anything about what grade the sprains were? An MCL injury can be one of the most painful knee injuries. I'm still guessing it was not worse than a grade 2 since I read his rehabilitation had been progressing nicely. A grade 3 or full tare of either would almost undoubtedly land him on IR.

Offline Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:28:11 PM(UTC)
Well that question was answered well before Monday.


Quote:
tom silverstein ‏@TomSilverstein

#Packers have activated TE Andrew Quarless to the 53-man roster and put rookie LB Nick Perry on injured reserve, according to an NFL source.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/7/2012(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:51:26 PM(UTC)
At least we get Quarless back. I like him.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:56:51 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
At least we get Quarless back. I like him.


Would be great if he is ready to play. He was a very good blocking TE, and had all the potential of Finley, only more raw to begin with. When he got hurt, he was actually further along in progress than Finley at that some point in career do to his experience while Finley was out in the SB run.

I always thought lining finley and quarless up on opposite sides would be a coverage nightmare for defenses. both should be a mismatch.
Offline nerdmann  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 4:07:05 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Would be great if he is ready to play. He was a very good blocking TE, and had all the potential of Finley, only more raw to begin with. When he got hurt, he was actually further along in progress than Finley at that some point in career do to his experience while Finley was out in the SB run.

I always thought lining finley and quarless up on opposite sides would be a coverage nightmare for defenses. both should be a mismatch.


I don't think he had Finley's athleticism, but then Finley doesn't seem to anymore either.

Quarless seemed to have really matured when he went down.
Offline Packfan87  
#21 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 4:53:27 PM(UTC)
The Packers are having some great luck with health of their first rounders the past few years....
Offline beast  
#22 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 7:14:31 PM(UTC)

I'm a Quarless fan and think he's got a ton of potential... but he's got a big fault... trouble catching the ball... just like the other TEs this season. He's probably mainly going to be a ST guy even if he's healthy, that or a blocker like Crabtree (but much faster).
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#23 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 9:08:03 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think he had Finley's athleticism, but then Finley doesn't seem to anymore either.

Quarless seemed to have really matured when he went down.


Coming into the league, They were the same height, Quarless had about 10lbs, 40 - Finley 4.65 Quarless 4.56, Bench Finley 20 reps Quarless 29", Vertical Finley 27.5" Quarless 32, Broad jump Finley 9'9" Quarless 9'11"
thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 11/7/2012(UTC), gbguy20 on 11/7/2012(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#24 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 9:23:53 PM(UTC)
frustrating to see how thin the LB spots have become.
Offline doddpower  
#25 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 9:33:28 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Coming into the league, They were the same height, Quarless had about 10lbs, 40 - Finley 4.65 Quarless 4.56, Bench Finley 20 reps Quarless 29", Vertical Finley 27.5" Quarless 32, Broad jump Finley 9'9" Quarless 9'11"


Quarless is an inch shorter at 6'4. That's certainly not a huge difference though.

Offline nerdmann  
#26 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:39:40 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Coming into the league, They were the same height, Quarless had about 10lbs, 40 - Finley 4.65 Quarless 4.56, Bench Finley 20 reps Quarless 29", Vertical Finley 27.5" Quarless 32, Broad jump Finley 9'9" Quarless 9'11"


Well shit. Let's get it on!
Offline doddpower  
#27 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 1:27:44 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Well shit. Let's get it on!



Not to mention he's coming off a MAJOR injury. It will be extremely impressive if he's able to return to his 'old form' anytime soon. I imagine it will take at least a year of being somewhat healthy and practicing to come close to getting back to where he was. Of course, it's possible he may never return to that same level.
Offline nerdmann  
#28 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:25:36 PM(UTC)
doddpower said: Go to Quoted Post
Not to mention he's coming off a MAJOR injury. It will be extremely impressive if he's able to return to his 'old form' anytime soon. I imagine it will take at least a year of being somewhat healthy and practicing to come close to getting back to where he was. Of course, it's possible he may never return to that same level.


Even so, he could still surpass Finley.
Offline doddpower  
#29 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:49:57 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Even so, he could still surpass Finley.


LOL, that's true. I'm still pretty high on DJ Williams. I know he hasn't looked great and is only 6'2, but I think he will have a much bigger role in this offense if Finley leaves, and may thrive in it. Height isn't a huge deal. After all, Aaron Hernandez is only 6'1, and Dustin Keller is only 6'2. There are several other good tight ends that are only 6'3. Williams just needs to continue to develop. At worst, I think he will eventually make a really good #2.

Offline Gaycandybacon  
#30 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 3:28:13 PM(UTC)
Mike Daniels is 6'0'' and he's played great for us! It's not all about size. look at Darren Sproles and MJD =d>
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter