Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#11 Posted : Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:10:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,489
Applause Received: 4,010
I just watched it again, in HD (I love that stuff) and the helmets did collide, but Ryan Taylor didn't lead with his helmet at all. I'm not sure if that'll play into it or not.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#12 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 6:01:26 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 946
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah instead he took his knee out. Yes, the new agenda is the head, but I still find little use for chopping the knees out. Hence why I really think the NFL is more motivated by the wallet and the continuance of the game than player safety on these fines for hits.

Otherwise, cut or reach blocks at the knees should be out of the game already.

On the Taylor Block.. by the letter of the law, it is legal, should it be? Debatable and hard to really play it if you are a player playing is space. Much like the defenseless receiver calls, some are being over protective. As a player, it is somewhat hard to specifically judge where a player is going to be and his body position when they are moving with momentum. It was a boarder line physical block.. could go either way. As a player, I would error on the side of popping him and debating it later. I would definitely appeal it... it applies the pressure back to the league on consistency and adjusting the rules back in line with their wallet protecting "vision".



I don't like the rule, but by rule, it is ILLEGAL. It is the same defenseless rule.
Online nerdmann  
#13 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 10:18:21 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,393
Applause Received: 1,414
Note that, being an offensive player, they did not flag him. After all dude might score and give the league a great highlight reel!

But they'll turn around and fine him after the fact.
Offline beast  
#14 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 10:43:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 563
Applause Received: 698
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't like the rule, but by rule, it is ILLEGAL. It is the same defenseless rule.


In no way am I saying you're wrong, because point blank I don't know all the rules... BUT..
There is a rule against hitting a guy with your shoulder pad into the front side of his shoulder pad? WTF

RyanTaylor
RyanTaylor

Offline Pack93z  
#15 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 11:15:18 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 436
Applause Received: 1,232
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't like the rule, but by rule, it is ILLEGAL. It is the same defenseless rule.


Which rule are you speaking of? This block or the cut?

This does not apply to clipping nor a crackback. So...

For this rule, as long as the blocker has both hands in the front or at the side of the player, it is not a penalty. See Highlight... and then look at the block in the attached photos.. both of Taylor's arms are either in front or on the side of the defender. It is a legal block.

But the next post, lets look at the defenseless or "blindside" block definitions in 2012.
Pack93z attached the following image(s):
Block In the Back.png (73kb) downloaded 40 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Offline Pack93z  
#16 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 11:28:03 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 436
Applause Received: 1,232
Defenseless player... Added 2012.

UserPostedImage


I need to rewatch the video, but I don't believe Taylor is moving parallel to the end line.. he was moving more of primary direction of away from the endzone.

Looking purely at this still.. it appears to support that. No Online video that I could find from here.

UserPostedImage


Anyone able to upload the segment with this block?
Pack93z attached the following image(s):
Defenseless player.JPG (120kb) downloaded 36 time(s).
2012 New Definitions for Defenseless player.JPG (42kb) downloaded 36 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Offline beast  
#17 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 2:13:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 563
Applause Received: 698
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Defenseless player... Added 2012.

UserPostedImage


I need to rewatch the video, but I don't believe Taylor is moving parallel to the end line.. he was moving more of primary direction of away from the endzone.


It depends on which endzone they're calling theirs... if they're calling the end zone they're defending then he's moving towards it for the block...

And based on that wording it has NOTHING to do with the hit... it's the "approach" which makes it illegal...

Based on that wording it's illegal for a blocker to use their athletic abilities and catch up to a guy from behind and touch him....

(but lets be honest... if it wasn't a big hit, and if it wasn't keep the guy down for a while, then the NFL probably wouldn't of cared or noticed this hit and wouldn't of said it's illegal... at least that's my current thought.)
Online nerdmann  
#18 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 3:15:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,393
Applause Received: 1,414
Defenseless is a WR going up for the ball, extending his arms and making his body vulnerable.

This is just a guy who didn't keep his head on a swivel. Fuck him.
Offline play2win  
#19 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 12:37:02 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
I just want to say, two weeks after the fact, that the fine is complete fucking bullshit. It was a great block by Taylor. Textbook.

;-)

Much better.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 11/19/2012(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (52m) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (56m) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (1h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (1h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (1h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (6h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (6h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (7h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (12h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (12h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (12h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (12h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (12h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (12h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (12h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (12h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (12h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (12h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (12h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (13h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (13h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (13h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
uffda udfa (13h) : Dallas play by play guy said we aren't best team.
uffda udfa (13h) : NBC is off the air down here. This is an OTA broadcast signal.
uffda udfa (13h) : Tornado warnings in Dallas area. Sign of aPACKalypse to Cowboys fans.
uffda udfa (13h) : I agree with a Homer. That's true. It was actually 35 per Erin Andrews post game int.
Zero2Cool (13h) : @espnhomer 4th and 26 is dead replaced by 36 on 3rd and 20.
uffda udfa (13h) : Garrett said he'd never seen or heard of the 15 yard penalty huddle rule.
uffda udfa (13h) : *toe
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Around The NFL / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

10h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool


Packers Headlines