[ Sign In ]
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

6 Pages«<3456>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline gbguy20  
#61 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 1:27:03 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,926
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 128
Applause Received: 178

It's what my buddy calls him, it just rubbed off on me
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#62 Posted : Sunday, November 18, 2012 7:08:14 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,922
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 493

Well, Starks had 25 rushes for 74 yards and added a reception for 6 yards.

That's better than Green's best day, but still under 3 yards per carry. I've been saying Starks is tougher than Green but Green is faster and a better receiver.

I personally don't have a preference yet. I think Benson wins his job back when he gets off IR.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline dfosterf  
#63 Posted : Sunday, November 18, 2012 7:14:47 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,460
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 106
Applause Received: 253

Originally Posted by: vikesrule Go to Quoted Post
UserPostedImage


Sorry, I usually don't do this in your "Packers section", but I just could not resist......bad VR. Big Grin



You have a hell of a running back, Nick-- We all pretty much acknowledge it.

We don't have anything like that, we just barely schlep along with a little bit better organization, imo, with possibly a better QB and WR corps. It's an opinion, but you might admit it could be possible. Not talking



UserPostedImage
damn skippy I'm an owner. I currently own a full .00001924537805515393 % of the Green Bay Packers.



Offline zombieslayer  
#64 Posted : Sunday, November 18, 2012 7:24:16 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,922
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 493

Originally Posted by: dfosterf Go to Quoted Post
You have a hell of a running back, Nick-- We all pretty much acknowledge it.

We don't have anything like that, we just barely schlep along with a little bit better organization, imo, with possibly a better QB and WR corps. It's an opinion, but you might admit it could be possible. Not talking





AP is THE best athlete in the NFL. He plays the least important position in the NFL.

We got the shittiest RBs in the NFL. We have a good shot at winning the SB. The Vikings? No.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline Rios39  
#65 Posted : Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:33:01 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 588
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 30

Starks made the most out of what he was given. You'll see him power 3-4 yards out of nothing unless the oline completely blows up and hes got 3 guys tackling him. Way better cuts and vision than Green as well.
blank
Offline Porforis  
#66 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 1:33:03 PM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,604
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Applause Given: 140
Applause Received: 294

In the chat yesterday, someone asked who we'd start when/if Benson comes back. I really don't know... Benson's got great vision and burst, as well as speed and tends to fall forward. Starks seems like a one-cut bruiser that always seems to get that extra yard or two. Better vision or power?
UserPostedImage
Offline Rios39  
#67 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 1:43:00 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 588
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 30

Originally Posted by: Porforis Go to Quoted Post
In the chat yesterday, someone asked who we'd start when/if Benson comes back. I really don't know... Benson's got great vision and burst, as well as speed and tends to fall forward. Starks seems like a one-cut bruiser that always seems to get that extra yard or two. Better vision or power?


Starks has much more break away speed than Benson though. We need to split carries better. Other teams get more than 1 back carries.. Should be utilizing Green more in third downs or in plays looking to get him into space. With Starks as the starter...

The Lions are good vs the run so we'll see if we improve against some of the other teams we face. You can Gash the Giants sometimes in the run cause they'll be charging up field for the sacks.
blank
Offline Zero2Cool  
#68 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 2:00:12 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Posts: 22,860
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States

Applause Given: 1,291
Applause Received: 900

I like James Starks, but I like and trust Cedric Benson more. Benson is the starter if/when healthy. No questions asked. If the Packers have a big lead in the 4th, you use Starks to punish their DL.
UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#69 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 2:11:16 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

Posts: 12,087
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 266
Applause Received: 688

25 att 74 yards. 2.96 per carry.

And now we are talking him as the permanent starter?

The guys runs hard, but he also runs high and takes a ton of heavy contact. I like him, but I think he also will struggle to continue to be available. Hope not, but.

I think he played a very nice game, but he is not the end all be all for the Packers running game, the "bell cow" if you will. The cliche word lately apparently.

If Benson comes back, healthy, he becomes that guy, with Starks rotating in. And I still think Green should be the third down back with a handful of carries a game.
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.

UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#70 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 5:50:36 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Pro Bowl MVP

Posts: 4,353
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 981
Applause Received: 184

Benson will be on a pitch count with that foot.
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again.
Offline Porforis  
#71 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 6:09:09 PM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,604
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Applause Given: 140
Applause Received: 294

Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
25 att 74 yards. 2.96 per carry.

And now we are talking him as the permanent starter?

The guys runs hard, but he also runs high and takes a ton of heavy contact. I like him, but I think he also will struggle to continue to be available. Hope not, but.

I think he played a very nice game, but he is not the end all be all for the Packers running game, the "bell cow" if you will. The cliche word lately apparently.

If Benson comes back, healthy, he becomes that guy, with Starks rotating in. And I still think Green should be the third down back with a handful of carries a game.


I think that if you take out the 2 or 3 plays when he was tackled for negative yards as a result of a defender screaming through barely touched or slowly developing plays to the outside, that YPC would be closer to 3.5. I still say that if you throw APete behind this line, he'll look like a top 5 RB at best instead of a hall of famer.
UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#72 Posted : Monday, November 19, 2012 8:11:43 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Pro Bowl MVP

Posts: 4,353
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 981
Applause Received: 184

Originally Posted by: Porforis Go to Quoted Post
I think that if you take out the 2 or 3 plays when he was tackled for negative yards as a result of a defender screaming through barely touched or slowly developing plays to the outside, that YPC would be closer to 3.5. I still say that if you throw APete behind this line, he'll look like a top 5 RB at best instead of a hall of famer.


Keep in mind their weird obsession with running him to the left as well.
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again.
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#73 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:59:04 AM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 410
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 42
Applause Received: 29

Starks had a pretty good day. Didn't put the ball on the ground, while facing a beast of a DL. Happy with that performance, but still hoping we get Benson back soon.

Like Green for short passing plays. Want to make sure we keep his head in the game as well. Brandon Jackson was useful for us in our Super Bowl winning playoff run and I can see Green playing a similar role.
"Stumbling from one disaster to another" Lost Together (Blue Rodeo)
Offline steveishere  
#74 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 7:58:32 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 265
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 87

Starks is our only RB who can consistently break tackles. He probably got over half that yardage after contact and got a lot more of it than probably Benson or Green could have in that game.
Offline Porforis  
#75 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:26:57 AM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,604
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Applause Given: 140
Applause Received: 294

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
Starks is our only RB who can consistently break tackles. He probably got over half that yardage after contact and got a lot more of it than probably Benson or Green could have in that game.


Benson did a fair amount of tackle-breaking too IIRC. And always fell forward, legs churning for an extra yard or two.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<3456>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.