Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#16 Posted : Friday, November 16, 2012 12:41:44 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
A comparison of numbers between the two seasons, just for kicks, through 9 games.

Maybe I will get cute and add drops to the chart.


But one of the stats that popped off the screen.. last season, we faced teams with a defensive ranking against the pass of 21.33.. bottom third of the league. This year. 11.78.
File Attachment(s):
Aaron Rodgers 2011 to 2012.pdf (39kb) downloaded 18 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline gbguy20  
#17 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 12:49:46 AM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 224
Applause Received: 294
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
A comparison of numbers between the two seasons, just for kicks, through 9 games.

Maybe I will get cute and add drops to the chart.


But one of the stats that popped off the screen.. last season, we faced teams with a defensive ranking against the pass of 21.33.. bottom third of the league. This year. 11.78.


i love those houston stats gahtdamn
call me Dan
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#18 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 2:02:13 AM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 178
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
A comparison of numbers between the two seasons, just for kicks, through 9 games.

Maybe I will get cute and add drops to the chart.


But one of the stats that popped off the screen.. last season, we faced teams with a defensive ranking against the pass of 21.33.. bottom third of the league. This year. 11.78.


WOW shit....... I thought he had more TDs at this time this year than last year... fuckin impressive. Shows why he ran away with MVP last year
Offline wpr  
#19 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:24:25 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Most years we would be more than pleased with the 107 QB rating. It just happens to be the year after an extraordinary performance.
[AR] is second overall in rating even after a sub [ar] showing against AZ. Even with so many drops by his intended receivers. Even with so many games being missed by his receivers. Even with so many sacks and being pressured so much. Can you imagine what his rating would be if he had the time to find the open/healthy receiver? it would be as good as last year.
UserPostedImage
Offline Porforis  
#20 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:33:09 AM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 178
Applause Received: 358
Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
Most years we would be more than pleased with the 107 QB rating. It just happens to be the year after an extraordinary performance.
[AR] is second overall in rating even after a sub [ar] showing against AZ. Even with so many drops by his intended receivers. Even with so many games being missed by his receivers. Even with so many sacks and being pressured so much. Can you imagine what his rating would be if he had the time to find the open/healthy receiver? it would be as good as last year.


And if you applied the same stipulations to last year his QB rating probably would have been 140+. Which isn't so much a knock on this year or "misfortune" this year, as it says just how amazing last year was.
UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#21 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 8:29:43 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: Porforis Go to Quoted Post
And if you applied the same stipulations to last year his QB rating probably would have been 140+. Which isn't so much a knock on this year or "misfortune" this year, as it says just how amazing last year was.


right the same thing can be applied to any year. Last year was amazing. This year is still a very good one.
UserPostedImage
Offline Wade  
#22 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 8:40:11 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 752
Applause Received: 737
Only "negative" that jumped out at me was the change in yards/attempt.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Offline zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Saturday, November 17, 2012 9:04:59 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post
Only "negative" that jumped out at me was the change in yards/attempt.


It seems to me that he's not completing as many of those deep passes that he was completing last year. I'm sure that has an effect.

My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline Pack93z  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:05:57 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
Updated through Week 11.
File Attachment(s):
Aaron Rodgers 2011 to 2012 Week 11.pdf (39kb) downloaded 4 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:16:26 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Updated through Week 11.


3 less completions and 3 less tds is totally unacceptable. if those 3 were completed for tds his qb rating would be about the same as last year. what a slacker.
UserPostedImage
Offline Porforis  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:25:28 AM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 178
Applause Received: 358
Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
3 less completions and 3 less tds is totally unacceptable. if those 3 were completed for tds his qb rating would be about the same as last year. what a slacker.


Maybe we could trade Rahjahs, Crosby, and a first and sixth rounder for Flynn?
UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:35:04 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
3 less completions and 3 less tds is totally unacceptable. if those 3 were completed for tds his qb rating would be about the same as last year. what a slacker.


Actually his completion percentage is the biggest component for his dip in QB rating.

But yes.. we are soooo doomed. I envy Chicago and Minnesota at this very moment. [duh]
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:37:36 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Actually his completion percentage is the biggest component for his dip in QB rating.

But yes.. we are soooo doomed. I envy Chicago and Minnesota at this very moment. [duh]


I know why the rating is down. I was being a smart ass.
UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:40:04 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
I know why the rating is down. I was being a smart ass.


I should know better.. I am sorry, break out the wet noodles.

I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:37:36 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,038
Applause Received: 2,435
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Actually his completion percentage is the biggest component for his dip in QB rating.

But yes.. we are soooo doomed. I envy Chicago and Minnesota at this very moment. [duh]


Actually, it's the ratio between TD's to INT's that has his QB rating lower, not completion percentage. I believe he has as many INT's in 10 games as he did in 15 last season with fewer TD's.

Of course if you're referring to 2011 after 10 games, then my comment is actually way actually out of place, actually. Smile Sorry, my girls love saying actually so whenever I read/hear it, it makes me wanna say it over and over again lol.
"I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything." - Nikola Tesla
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Laser Gunns

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

26-Feb / Announcements / Zero2Cool

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool


Tweeter