Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online beast  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:55:16 AM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 332
Applause Received: 379
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
To me, they are ALL must wins. Especially after gifting the game to the Colts. CHI is tied for the division lead, even though we own the tie breaker. I would feel better with us owning the division lead outright. Add to that, I would much rather force the Giants to have to come back to GB in the playoffs, rather than have us go there. The Packers need to right that NFC Divisional loss last year, and what better place to do that than at home.

Win Packers.


Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.

Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.

So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.
Offline Wade  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:55:30 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 790
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Interesting.

Just a couple of flaws in your aforementioned "stakes"
1. Coming to Harrisburg PA, shithole that it is - no problem.
2. Licking your dogs balls - very difficult to accomplish since I am sure that they are sized like your balls which are microscopic in nature.
3. In front of all your friends - foster you have no friends, so that point is moot.

With that said, since you seem to agree to the 17 point spread.....
You win and I'll send you a bottle of some very good booze of your choice (up to $200)
I win, well I don't drink anymore, so we will have to come with some kind appropriate compensation.

You game bucko?


Well, Foster, in lieu of the dog bit (why would you impose such a thing on your dog?), why don't you promise to send him a lobe of fresh foie gras and some sweetbreads? You lose the be, he gets some fine eating, but you get the satisfaction of giving him the bunch of offal he deserves for being a pinhead Viking fan.

[grin1] [grin1]
Offline Rios39  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:59:21 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
This is the type of team our offense needs to chew them up in the middle of the field. Cobb and Finley on slants and inside routes. That's how you kill the cover 2 passive shit. We did a poor job of it vs the Lions.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 4:35:31 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 509
Applause Received: 582
Giants coming off bye week, loser of 2 in a row.
November has never been their time of year.

Packers have 3 road games left, Giants,Bears and Vikings.
Currently 3-2 on the road, the old saying win at home split on the road, 12-4 record.

Since the Packers lost 1 at home, winning 2 of the next 3 road games will put them back at that 12-4 pace.

Not a must win, in fact if The Packers could chose which game to lose it would probably be The Giant game.

Interesting thing, when I brought up FFL site I use that ranks players, Aaron is #1QB this week, He has usually been somewhere between #3 and #5.

Obviously fantasy guru's think he is going to have a big day.

O-line showed the effects of having to make 2 moves last week, but Evan Dietrich-Smith and T.J. Lang both now have a game under their belts, and should be better.

I'm betting The Packers D will try and shut down the running game to force Manning to throw the ball, then let the DB's do their thing.

Control the line of scrimmage, force The Giants to drive the length of the field, create turnovers, do these 3 things, no matter how ugly it could be Packers will win.
Offline zombieslayer  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:00:35 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Must win? No.

Reading the bet between Foster & VR? Win. Well, almost. Will there be a bet or will it just be talk? :-"

The Giants knocked us out of the Playoffs twice in 5 years. They're our new Cows. But we're going in the Playoffs regardless of what happens with this game. So it's not a must win.

After the Giants knock the Niners out of the Playoffs (and Pack93z mails me a shot glass) then we face the Giants in the CG, that game's a must win.
Offline vikesrule  
#21 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:20:13 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post

Reading the bet between Foster & VR? Win. Well, almost. Will there be a bet or will it just be talk? :-"


Just waiting for the dumbass from Harrisburg/Hershey to respond to my offer....instead of the usual "tap dancing, pussyfooting, blowing smoke out his ass" response... [grin1]

I am beginning the think that fostersan is really an Air Force weenie....if it looks like a taco and smells like tuna... well...[boxing]

Offline play2win  
#22 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:57:33 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.

Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.

So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.


beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro!
Offline zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:32:39 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.

Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.

So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.


I know you're pointing out football facts, but I'm about as worried of the Vikings winning the NFC North as I am of my wife running off with Justin Bieber. MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best. At worst, we finish 10-6.
Online beast  
#24 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:16:40 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 332
Applause Received: 379
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro!


Happy Thanksgiving to you too. As far as you'd like the Giants @ Packers game... it seems like the road team has been winning that game most of the time lately. Packers go to NY (or NJ I should say), and they win. NY comes to GB and they win.
Offline vikesrule  
#25 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:11:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
....MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best.....


"MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say....:-k

Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting.

That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager?

Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? [boxing]


Offline zombieslayer  
#26 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:51:32 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
"MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say....:-k

Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting.

That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager?

Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? [boxing]




We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going.

Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager?
Offline vikesrule  
#27 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:59:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going.

Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager?


Make it an even $50 and you're on.


Yep, Mitt zombieslayer

Early this year...."the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"

Later this year...."I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"

Now......"The Packers will sweep the Vikings"

Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]

User is suspended until 7/18/2016 1:25:29 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#28 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:28:16 PM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 758
Applause Received: 1,541
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.
Offline zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:37:19 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Make it an even $50 and you're on.


Yep, Mitt zombieslayer

Early this year...."the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"

Later this year...."I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"

Now......"The Packers will sweep the Vikings"

Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]



Geez. Did I really make this bet? You got 4 chances to win.

OK, why not? After all, I'm betting against the Vikings. [grin1]


DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.


Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. :-k

As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal."

There's no correlation.
Offline vikesrule  
#30 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:21:03 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.


zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. Think

As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal."

There's no correlation.


Amazing, truly amazing.

Ya know zs, every time that DakotaT posts anything, I say to myself "VR, there is no way that DakotaT can ever say anything more stupid than that last comment."

And then BAM, he posts again and completely blows away his previous effort at dumbassness.

Incredible, simply incredible.

DT, you are most fortunate that your body's basic life support functions are involuntary or you would probably forget to breath.



Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Lock'em down!
flep (2-Jul) : It's getting to that time of year when I book days off work after Packer night games as 1.30am kick offs in the UK
TheKanataThrilla (1-Jul) : Happy Canada Day!!!
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: Grabacr (27)
Zero2Cool (28-Jun) : lol spanks
beast (28-Jun) : Some reports, David Sweat caught and man hunt for them over
beast (28-Jun) : Yay Julie :) ... are birthday spanks an option? :P jk
Zero2Cool (28-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: 4PackGirl (46) aka Julie.
Zero2Cool (22-Jun) : Someone toasted teh SQL Server we were on, took us down with'em! Jerkz
Zero2Cool (22-Jun) : Funny thing is, people keep responding to him, playing right into his hands. Why? lol
Zero2Cool (22-Jun) : Today only, you can create new topic for *FREE* :D
Porforis (22-Jun) : Will football start already? Sick of talking about draft picks and Ted Thompson and how good/not teams are going to be.
Zero2Cool (15-Jun) : Media loves making fools out of people while they twist facts.
gbguy20 (14-Jun) : nvm foundh im
gbguy20 (14-Jun) : smokey is mia
Zero2Cool (12-Jun) : gone!!
Porforis (12-Jun) : Kevin's a big poopyhead and a vikings fan!
Zero2Cool (12-Jun) : sweet, now I can suspend people and provide a reason! :) Volunteers?
Zero2Cool (12-Jun) : doing small update ... cross finnners!
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : *Sad Panda*
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : No, not you.
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : You?
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I can?!
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : You can do it!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

3-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter