Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:05:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
I went looking for the sack % numbers and started to compile some different numbers for reference, a couple things surprised me a bit.

1. I knew the Packers were giving up more sacks the the average, but 9 over the average mildly shocked me. Only three teams give up a worse sack percentage.. two being teams in the NFC playoff chase. That is a concern, but I would like to see how the run attempts, when we became more balanced, have improved that over the course of the season.

2. I expected our yards per carry to be much more off the NFL average than the 3.77 to the league average of 4.21.

3. I expected our completion percentage to be greater than 5.41% over average, but then considering the sack numbers, it is just as if not more impressive than I expected. That is one of the best cases for how special Rodgers and this passing game really is.

4. I love our play mix at the moment, just about 60/40 in pass ratio.

File Attachment(s):
NFL Offensive Stats Through Week 11.pdf (47kb) downloaded 8 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 11/20/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:42:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
I hate Niner fans. (That has nothing to do with your analysis, but just wanted to say that).

1) Uncle Ted Thompson's #1 off-season priority needs to be OL. That % needs to be around 6.

2) 3.77 is inflated by Aaron Rodgers and Cobb. Our RBs are probably closer to 3.4 or 3.3.

3) Would be higher if our receivers didn't have the dropsies.

4) 60/40 is about right.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:47:08 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I hate Niner fans. (That has nothing to do with your analysis, but just wanted to say that).

1) Uncle Ted Thompson's #1 off-season priority needs to be OL. That % needs to be around 6.

2) 3.77 is inflated by Aaron Rodgers and Cobb. Our RBs are probably closer to 3.4 or 3.3.

3) Would be higher if our receivers didn't have the dropsies.

4) 60/40 is about right.


They should be a factor. At least Cobb should anyways.. He took snaps at RB and gained almost a 100 yards thus far. I'd use the 3.77 as a basis. Who cares if it's the RB or Aaron Rodgers it's still running the ball.
Offline zombieslayer  
#4 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:50:28 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
They should be a factor. At least Cobb should anyways.. He took snaps at RB and gained almost a 100 yards thus far. I'd use the 3.77 as a basis. Who cares if it's the RB or Aaron Rodgers it's still running the ball.


I was just arguing semantics with Pack93z. You're right, it really doesn't matter though.
Offline Rios39  
#5 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:55:51 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
Id like to see how many sacks are from holding the ball though.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:13:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,063
When drafting players, a great deal of them are projects waiting to be coached up. Therefore, I think its time to quit pining for drafting more OL as that's been done. Rather, the demands need to be on a new OL coaching staff.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DakotaT on 11/22/2012(UTC), nerdmann on 11/22/2012(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#7 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:22:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,051
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Id like to see how many sacks are from holding the ball though.



it has to be about 25%
Offline Scythe  
#8 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:22:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 2/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 2
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Id like to see how many sacks are from holding the ball though.


According to FO, it's 15 (through week 10).

http://footballoutsiders...ure-short-and-long-sacks

Offline DakotaT  
#9 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:31:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
When drafting players, a great deal of them are projects waiting to be coached up. Therefore, I think its time to quit pining for drafting more OL as that's been done. Rather, the demands need to be on a new OL coaching staff.


You really can say something intelligent once in a while, can't you?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (1h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (1h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (2h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (2h) : go pack go ?
wpr (2h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (3h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (3h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (3h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (3h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (4h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (4h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (4h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (4h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (4h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (5h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (5h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (5h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (5h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (5h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (5h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (7h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (7h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (7h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (7h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (7h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (7h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (7h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (7h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (8h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (8h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (8h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (8h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (8h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
13m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines