PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Green Bay Packers Talk
»
For the Packers Psyche - Is the Giants game a MUST WIN?
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 285
Applause Received: 341
|
Originally Posted by: play2win  To me, they are ALL must wins. Especially after gifting the game to the Colts. CHI is tied for the division lead, even though we own the tie breaker. I would feel better with us owning the division lead outright. Add to that, I would much rather force the Giants to have to come back to GB in the playoffs, rather than have us go there. The Packers need to right that NFC Divisional loss last year, and what better place to do that than at home.
Win Packers. Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears. Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker. So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win. |
America's team Of the people by the people for the people Packer People  ~ madeby ~ pack93z ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 741
Applause Received: 732
|
Originally Posted by: vikesrule Interesting.
Just a couple of flaws in your aforementioned "stakes"
1. Coming to Harrisburg PA, shithole that it is - no problem.
2. Licking your dogs balls - very difficult to accomplish since I am sure that they are sized like your balls which are microscopic in nature.
3. In front of all your friends - foster you have no friends, so that point is moot.
With that said, since you seem to agree to the 17 point spread.....
You win and I'll send you a bottle of some very good booze of your choice (up to $200)
I win, well I don't drink anymore, so we will have to come with some kind appropriate compensation.
You game bucko? Well, Foster, in lieu of the dog bit (why would you impose such a thing on your dog?), why don't you promise to send him a lobe of fresh foie gras and some sweetbreads? You lose the be, he gets some fine eating, but you get the satisfaction of giving him the bunch of offal he deserves for being a pinhead Viking fan. [grin1] [grin1] |
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
|
This is the type of team our offense needs to chew them up in the middle of the field. Cobb and Finley on slants and inside routes. That's how you kill the cover 2 passive shit. We did a poor job of it vs the Lions. |
blank |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 404
Applause Received: 494
|
Giants coming off bye week, loser of 2 in a row.
November has never been their time of year.
Packers have 3 road games left, Giants,Bears and Vikings.
Currently 3-2 on the road, the old saying win at home split on the road, 12-4 record.
Since the Packers lost 1 at home, winning 2 of the next 3 road games will put them back at that 12-4 pace.
Not a must win, in fact if The Packers could chose which game to lose it would probably be The Giant game.
Interesting thing, when I brought up FFL site I use that ranks players, Aaron is #1QB this week, He has usually been somewhere between #3 and #5.
Obviously fantasy guru's think he is going to have a big day.
O-line showed the effects of having to make 2 moves last week, but Evan Dietrich-Smith and T.J. Lang both now have a game under their belts, and should be better.
I'm betting The Packers D will try and shut down the running game to force Manning to throw the ball, then let the DB's do their thing.
Control the line of scrimmage, force The Giants to drive the length of the field, create turnovers, do these 3 things, no matter how ugly it could be Packers will win.
|
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Must win? No.
Reading the bet between Foster & VR? Win. Well, almost. Will there be a bet or will it just be talk? :-"
The Giants knocked us out of the Playoffs twice in 5 years. They're our new Cows. But we're going in the Playoffs regardless of what happens with this game. So it's not a must win.
After the Giants knock the Niners out of the Playoffs (and Pack93z mails me a shot glass) then we face the Giants in the CG, that game's a must win. |
My man Donald Driver  (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar] |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
|
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer
Reading the bet between Foster & VR? Win. Well, almost. Will there be a bet or will it just be talk? :-"
Just waiting for the dumbass from Harrisburg/Hershey to respond to my offer....instead of the usual "tap dancing, pussyfooting, blowing smoke out his ass" response... [grin1] I am beginning the think that fostersan is really an Air Force weenie....if it looks like a taco and smells like tuna... well...[boxing]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
 Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC) Location: Milwaukee Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
|
Originally Posted by: beast Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.
Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.
So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.
beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: beast Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.
Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.
So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.
I know you're pointing out football facts, but I'm about as worried of the Vikings winning the NFC North as I am of my wife running off with Justin Bieber. MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best. At worst, we finish 10-6. |
My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar] |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 285
Applause Received: 341
|
Originally Posted by: play2win beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro! Happy Thanksgiving to you too. As far as you'd like the Giants @ Packers game... it seems like the road team has been winning that game most of the time lately. Packers go to NY (or NJ I should say), and they win. NY comes to GB and they win. Message modified by user Friday, November 23, 2012 10:03:48 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
America's team Of the people by the people for the people Packer People ~ madeby ~ pack93z ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
|
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer ....MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best..... "MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say....  Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting. That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager? Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? [boxing]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: vikesrule "MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say.... Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting.That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager? Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? [boxing] We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going. Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager? |
My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar] |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
|
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going.
Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager? Make it an even $50 and you're on. Yep, Mitt zombieslayer Early this year.... "the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"Later this year.... "I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"Now...... "The Packers will sweep the Vikings"Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 719
Applause Received: 1,483
|
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: vikesrule Make it an even $50 and you're on.
Yep, Mitt zombieslayer
Early this year...."the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"
Later this year...."I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"
Now......"The Packers will sweep the Vikings"
Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]
Geez. Did I really make this bet? You got 4 chances to win. OK, why not? After all, I'm betting against the Vikings. [grin1] Originally Posted by: DakotaT Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis. Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal." There's no correlation. |
My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar] |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis. Originally Posted by: zombieslayer Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. Think
As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal."
There's no correlation. Amazing, truly amazing. Ya know zs, every time that DakotaT posts anything, I say to myself "VR, there is no way that DakotaT can ever say anything more stupid than that last comment."And then BAM, he posts again and completely blows away his previous effort at dumbassness. Incredible, simply incredible. DT, you are most fortunate that your body's basic life support functions are involuntary or you would probably forget to breath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest (3)
|
PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Green Bay Packers Talk
»
For the Packers Psyche - Is the Giants game a MUST WIN?
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.