Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
vikesrule  
#21 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:20:13 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post

Reading the bet between Foster & VR? Win. Well, almost. Will there be a bet or will it just be talk? :-"


Just waiting for the dumbass from Harrisburg/Hershey to respond to my offer....instead of the usual "tap dancing, pussyfooting, blowing smoke out his ass" response... [grin1]

I am beginning the think that fostersan is really an Air Force weenie....if it looks like a taco and smells like tuna... well...Lets Box!

play2win  
#22 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:57:33 AM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.

Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.

So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.


beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro!
zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:32:39 AM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Just want to point out... the Bears could end up being 3rd in the division after this week. Sounds like Cutler could miss another game, and if the Vikings could beat the Bears, then the Vikings are ahead of the Bears.

Also if the Vikings win, and the Packers lose, they'll be tied and the Vikings will have the current tie breaker.

So if they Packers lose, they'll be in 2nd in the NFC North... and Vikings could be first if the Packers lose and Vikings win.


I know you're pointing out football facts, but I'm about as worried of the Vikings winning the NFC North as I am of my wife running off with Justin Bieber. MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best. At worst, we finish 10-6.
beast  
#24 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:16:40 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
beast, I'm not even thinking along those lines, but duly noted! Happy Thanksgiving bro!


Happy Thanksgiving to you too. As far as you'd like the Giants @ Packers game... it seems like the road team has been winning that game most of the time lately. Packers go to NY (or NJ I should say), and they win. NY comes to GB and they win.
vikesrule  
#25 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:11:29 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
....MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up - this week @da Bears, with or without Cutler (but more than likely with so forget it Vikings), us, Houston, and us. That would put them at 8-8 at best.....


"MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say....:-k

Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting.

That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager?

Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? Lets Box!


zombieslayer  
#26 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 4:51:32 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
"MN's got 4 guaranteed losses coming up" ...Hmmmm... 4 guaranteed losses you say....:-k

Let's see, you say one loss to da Bears, swept by the Packers and one loss to the Texans.....interesting.

That sounds like a mighty bold prediction my amigo, would you care to back that up with a "little" side wager?

Or have you been hanging around foster so much that you are starting to blow smoke out your ass as well? Lets Box!




We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going.

Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager?
vikesrule  
#27 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:59:37 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
We already got a bet going. And I got the Niners vs Texans bet going with Mr. I Love Quarterbacks. So it's not like I don't have any bets going.

Now if you STILL want to get a side bet going, Packers sweep your Vikings, you lose to the Texans, and one or more losses to da Bears. That's 4 games that have to go my way (well, technically 4 out of 5 games with da Bears being the team that needs to generate a win). $40 on top of our current wager?


Make it an even $50 and you're on.


Yep, Mitt zombieslayer

Early this year...."the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"

Later this year...."I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"

Now......"The Packers will sweep the Vikings"

Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]

User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#28 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:28:16 PM(UTC)
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.
zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:37:19 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Make it an even $50 and you're on.


Yep, Mitt zombieslayer

Early this year...."the Packers will sweep the NFCN....uh never mind"

Later this year...."I'm not betting on the Packers this year...uh never mind"

Now......"The Packers will sweep the Vikings"

Who loves ya ZS? [grin1]



Geez. Did I really make this bet? You got 4 chances to win.

OK, why not? After all, I'm betting against the Vikings. [grin1]


DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.


Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. :-k

As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal."

There's no correlation.
vikesrule  
#30 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:21:03 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Men that insist on making wagers are compensating for something. Yes, that means you both must have a small penis.


zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Huh? That doesn't even make any sense. Think

As the resident Pop Psychologist, I'll give Dakota an F in Psychoanalysis for 11/22/2012. That's about as logical as saying "I prefer Macs to Windows." "Really? You must be a cannibal."

There's no correlation.


Amazing, truly amazing.

Ya know zs, every time that DakotaT posts anything, I say to myself "VR, there is no way that DakotaT can ever say anything more stupid than that last comment."

And then BAM, he posts again and completely blows away his previous effort at dumbassness.

Incredible, simply incredible.

DT, you are most fortunate that your body's basic life support functions are involuntary or you would probably forget to breath.



User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#31 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 9:37:05 PM(UTC)
So basically you have both confirmed my epiphany. Bet away boys.
zombieslayer  
#32 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:21:07 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
So basically you have both confirmed my epiphany. Bet away boys.


Whoa. That may be the most complex word you've ever used. =d> \:d/ [rockon] [happy]

Guess who just bought a thesaurus.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#33 Posted : Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:33:48 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Whoa. That may be the most complex word you've ever used. =d> \:d/ [rockon] [happy]

Guess who just bought a thesaurus.


I have a computer dumbass. Lets Box!
Wade  
#34 Posted : Friday, November 23, 2012 6:52:08 AM(UTC)
This is a first. *I* am the one bringing a thread back on track...

Re: Giants game a must win. I hope not, because I have a bad feeling about this one.

Much as I get annoyed by this generation of Mannings, this is the kind of game where Eli Manning excels. Plus the Giants are coming off a bye, and IIRC they, unlike the Packers, tend to come off their byes ready to take no prisoners.

And our OL is...well, our OL.

My guess is that, after last weeks mediocre performance, McCarthy and Rodgers will have the team in "1, 2, 3...DOMINATE!" mode. But still, I worry.

Fortunately, this is NOT a must-win game, not with the likes of Minnesota (Ponder? hahahha), Chicago (still suck!), and Detroit (hahhaha) in four of the remaining five games?

Even with a loss to the Gints, the Pack will go at worst 4-2 the rest of the season. And that'll be good enough for at worst the 4th seed. The Gints would likely get the three seed. Though they've got games against Washington, Atlanta, and Baltimore, all of which could be losses, that would s till put them in position to win head-to-head tiebreaker with GB.

The Packers need to win if they want to get a playoff bye. But personally, I like their chances better if they don't get that playoff week off.

play2win  
#35 Posted : Friday, November 23, 2012 11:03:45 AM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Happy Thanksgiving to you too. As far as you'd like the Giants @ Packers game... it seems like the road team has been winning that game most of the time lately. Packers go to NY (or NJ I should say), and they win. NY comes to GB and they win.


Hey beast,

I guess the bigger point I was trying to illustrate, is that I would like for our Packers to force the issue with a win at NYG, and retake our once proud home field advantage. We should not lose games at Lambeau in the winter. Period.

Green Bay needs to consciously take that back. Some way. Somehow. I think winning out, or close to it this season will help us get there.

Hey, get a painting crew in the visiting locker room pronto, and paint that sucker pink. Why not? Hey, it would be a start IMO. The Packers organization should be looking at every little thing that they themselves can change in order to make this an unenjoyable place for the opposition to play.

My feeling is that they have gone a bit overboard in making Lambeau too friendly. Our opponents should fear coming here.
mi_keys  
#36 Posted : Friday, November 23, 2012 12:19:41 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Much as I get annoyed by this generation of Mannings, this is the kind of game where Eli Manning excels. Plus the Giants are coming off a bye, and IIRC they, unlike the Packers, tend to come off their byes ready to take no prisoners.


Since Coughlin took over the Giants in 2004 they are 5-3 after a bye week, 5-4 inclusive of one playoff loss coming off a bye. Since 2006 McCarthy and the Pack are 6-1 after a bye, 7-2 including the playoffs.

Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
And our OL is...well, our OL.

My guess is that, after last weeks mediocre performance, McCarthy and Rodgers will have the team in "1, 2, 3...DOMINATE!" mode. But still, I worry.


I do too.

Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Fortunately, this is NOT a must-win game, not with the likes of Minnesota (Ponder? hahahha), Chicago (still suck!), and Detroit (hahhaha) in four of the remaining five games?

Even with a loss to the Gints, the Pack will go at worst 4-2 the rest of the season. And that'll be good enough for at worst the 4th seed. The Gints would likely get the three seed. Though they've got games against Washington, Atlanta, and Baltimore, all of which could be losses, that would s till put them in position to win head-to-head tiebreaker with GB.

The Packers need to win if they want to get a playoff bye. But personally, I like their chances better if they don't get that playoff week off.


I agree that this is not a must win game unless we want a bye week. Atlanta has had a bit of a farce as far as their schedule goes and they still have games against Carolina and Detroit. Assuming they win those two, all they have to do is split the 4 games against the Bucs (2x), Saints and Giants to get to 13-3. San Fran should be able to finish with 11 or 12 wins. That means we'd have to go at least 5-1 to have a shot at the 2 seed.

Oh, under your scenario where the Giants lose to Washington, Atlanta and Baltimore they finish 9-7. We'd only need 3 more wins to finish in the 3rd seed, and that's where I think we'll be, hosting either Chicago or Seattle before a trip to San Fran.
beast  
#37 Posted : Friday, November 23, 2012 12:48:56 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
We should not lose games at Lambeau in the winter. Period.


Shouldn't but did... twice to the Giants in the playoffs. I don't want to see them or the 49ers in the playoffs. 49ers are probably gonna make it... and as it looks now will be 2nd and 3rd seeds... and there for meeting if the 3rd seed beats the 6th seed.

But the Giants have a tough schedule left with the Packers, Falcons, Ravens the hot Saints and a game against the Redskins. It's possible they could still lose their division and might miss the playoffs... (or might get the 6th seed and have to face the 49er if they get the 3rd seed. )
play2win  
#38 Posted : Friday, November 23, 2012 12:53:41 PM(UTC)
Yeah, I just want them to turn that around. The only way to do that is meet your nemesis head on, and take him down! On our turf! I'd like for the Packers to put that shit to bed and bring back our home field advantage. I don't care who we face.
dyeah_gb  
#39 Posted : Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:46:54 AM(UTC)
This is actually one of the few games that I am not stressing. A loss here does not hurt us too bad in my eyes. I also am thinking about last year where the playoff bye week may have actually hurt us. Also, the last five years have shown that home field has become more of a disadvantage for this team in the playoffs and that is sad.
Pack93z  
#40 Posted : Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:19:07 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post


While I understand what they are saying, I don't know that I agree with the premise.

Instead, I think this is an important measuring stick game right now, one in which it will really lay out the Packers must do the remainder of the season to make the run they want to. In fact, I think if they blow out the Giants it will actually be counter productive to the Packers end goal.

We need to be a hungry and aggressive team, I think as long as this game is close and well played, win or lose it will fit the Packers needs moving forward. I actually think a blowout loss would be better than a blowout win in terms of the Packers mindset.


Well, the measuring stick has shown that we need to become a more physical team overall.. I think this is a wake up call for this team and coaching staff. We are what we are in terms of an offensive line, so now we have to gameplan to protect it as much as we can when we face fast defensive fronts.

I stand that this game being what it is, a blowout loss, will be more of a benefit than a blow out win. I don't like having to watch this type of ass kicking.. but I think this wakes up the team that we have to step up the physical effort.

The Giants going for it twice on fourth down should just fuel it.. if it doesn't, well then, this team will be sitting home in Feb.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : lol coach with jokes MM: "If i don't know tomorrow, they'll be putting Pat McKenzie on IR."
Zero2Cool (1h) : Rod of Airs here to fook you up!
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers gonna play coy until Saturday night and go SURPRISE BITCHES
Zero2Cool (1h) : Mike McCarthy on Rodgers timetable: "This is in the hands of the experts. ... Let's just wait until the experts make their decision."
Zero2Cool (7h) : You can freaking localize ads too to region. This is NOT hard. Lazy asses.
Zero2Cool (7h) : I think so too, but it's time they get with it. You can have ads in streaming too.
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : You've been able to stream postseason games for a few years now, I think.
Zero2Cool (7h) : last 4 games played, Packers have worst pass efficency, Browns 2nd worst
Zero2Cool (9h) : On @oath @YahooSports and @NFL Apps
Zero2Cool (9h) : Good news for NFL fans: starting with this season’s playoffs you can stream games on your phone. All phones. All carriers. For free. On
Zero2Cool (9h) : Verizon to pay NFL $500 million a year to stream games
beast (19h) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (20h) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (20h) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (20h) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (20h) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (20h) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (20h) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (20h) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (20h) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (21h) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (10-Dec) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Starting? who cares?
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Browns getting 1st win
dhazer (10-Dec) : who is starting at rb today ?
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Perry innactive! Fackrell & Biegal step up today!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Both undrafted rookies, Lenzy Pipkins and Donatello Brown, are active for the #Packers. They join Randall, House and Hawkins as the active c
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / gotarace

59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

Headlines