Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
PackFanWithTwins  
#1 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 6:41:22 PM(UTC)
Jerron McMillian was fined $21K for his hit on Giants WR Bennett. What else is a defender suppose to do now?

McMillian turned himself away to try and prevent helmet to helmet contact. He lowered himself down and did't hit high. Besides not trying to play the game, what else is a DB suppose to do?

Where to hit

These fines by the NFL have become a friggin joke.
Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 7:21:52 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Jerron McMillian was fined $21K for his hit on Giants WR Bennett. What else is a defender suppose to do now?

McMillian turned himself away to try and prevent helmet to helmet contact. He lowered himself down and did't hit high. Besides not trying to play the game, what else is a DB suppose to do?

These fines by the NFL have become a friggin joke.


Completely agree with your assessment here... there is nothing more a defensive player can do. Unrealistic expectations.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#3 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 7:32:29 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Completely agree with your assessment here... there is nothing more a defensive player can do. Unrealistic expectations.


That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated.
doddpower  
#4 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 7:48:21 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated.



Except for the fact that his hit could have jarred the ball lose and potentially made the play incomplete.
PackFanWithTwins  
#5 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 7:56:38 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated.


Well, he didn't score a TD. With the rules "must maintain control through the process". Hitting clean and hard, can dislodge and prevent a TD. And McMillian hit him clean and hard.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#6 Posted : Friday, November 30, 2012 9:16:35 PM(UTC)
Well, I guess if Baltimore could get screwed out of going to the super bowl by a guy stripping the ball after possession then the Giant receiver could have had it jarred loose. Please explain to me why it should be touchdown when a running back reaches the ball over the goal line and has it knocked out of his hands. Shouldn't that be a fumble then?
Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 8:19:02 AM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Well, I guess if Baltimore could get screwed out of going to the super bowl by a guy stripping the ball after possession then the Giant receiver could have had it jarred loose. Please explain to me why it should be touchdown when a running back reaches the ball over the goal line and has it knocked out of his hands. Shouldn't that be a fumble then?


The ball carrier (this is not relegated to RB's) has possession and control of the ball when reaching it over the pylon or goal line. A receiver in the process of catching a pass in the endzone does not. That's the difference.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#8 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 12:26:10 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
The ball carrier (this is not relegated to RB's) has possession and control of the ball when reaching it over the pylon or goal line. A receiver in the process of catching a pass in the endzone does not. That's the difference.


A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world.
gbguy20  
#9 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:08:00 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world.


ur logic is terrible....

"WHAT THE DEFENDER GETS THE CHANCE TO KNOCK THE BALL OUT FOR AN INCOMPLETION?! THIS IS A PUSSIFIED LEAGUE!"
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:49:38 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
ur logic is terrible....

"WHAT THE DEFENDER GETS THE CHANCE TO KNOCK THE BALL OUT FOR AN INCOMPLETION?! THIS IS A PUSSIFIED LEAGUE!"


My point is that if it is an instantanious touchdown for the ball carrier reaching it across the goaline, then the same rule should apply for the pass and reception. If you braniacs can't understand that intense scenario, I guess I'll digress. FFFUUUUUCK!!
Zero2Cool  
#11 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:59:23 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world.


You realize you're the one pussify things right? You don't want the defender to have a chance to dislodge the ball? That's awfully pussy of you. Why you such a pussy? You have no old school way of thinking so quit that high horse right now. You obviously no nothing of the rules of 'old school'.

There is no such thing as a quick catch. You either catch it, or don't. Remember Seahawks game?

No question, I'm in the room that there are too many rules. It's one thing that's attracting me to College ball more. It seems things are more black/white than in the NFL. I blame money for ruining the NFL. I would love an NFL like the one Jack Lambert played in. You probably don't know who that is do you young buck? He was a fearless middle linebacker who took shit from no one. Google him boy!
Pack93z  
#12 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 2:01:17 PM(UTC)
The act of a catch in the game of football is more complex than 300 level trig formulas.. I think purposely done to give the NFL the grey area needed to explain any blown call.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#13 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 8:10:46 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
You realize you're the one pussify things right? You don't want the defender to have a chance to dislodge the ball? That's awfully pussy of you. Why you such a pussy? You have no old school way of thinking so quit that high horse right now. You obviously no nothing of the rules of 'old school'.

There is no such thing as a quick catch. You either catch it, or don't. Remember Seahawks game?

No question, I'm in the room that there are too many rules. It's one thing that's attracting me to College ball more. It seems things are more black/white than in the NFL. I blame money for ruining the NFL. I would love an NFL like the one Jack Lambert played in. You probably don't know who that is do you young buck? He was a fearless middle linebacker who took shit from no one. Google him boy!


You are one confused mother fucker. My point is that if you are going to give that pussy touchdown for reaching the ball over the goalline, then you have to give the receiver the touchdown for the catch to be consistent. I don't think Mcmillian deserved the penalty, but even if he had dislodged the ball, they would have ruled it a touchdown cause he had already crossed the goal line with possession.

And FYI Zero, every time you give me one of your authority little grandstand gestures, I just giggle. What you're trying to accomplish with those is futile.

Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 8:51:57 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
You are one confused mother fucker. My point is that if you are going to give that pussy touchdown for reaching the ball over the goalline, then you have to give the receiver the touchdown for the catch to be consistent. I don't think Mcmillian deserved the penalty, but even if he had dislodged the ball, they would have ruled it a touchdown cause he had already crossed the goal line with possession.

And FYI Zero, every time you give me one of your authority little grandstand gestures, I just giggle. What you're trying to accomplish with those is futile.



If the defender dislodged the ball, it would not have been ruled a touchdown. Do you even watch the games? Know the rules or just pretend your words are gospel while pounding your chest boy? That's right, I said it! NFL Rulebook, Google it, study it and come back when you've learned something!

[grin1] [grin1] [grin1]
Porforis  
#15 Posted : Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:11:27 PM(UTC)
yooperfan  
#16 Posted : Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:02:03 AM(UTC)
Flag football! That will solve the problem.
PackFanWithTwins  
#17 Posted : Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:06:19 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Well, I guess if Baltimore could get screwed out of going to the super bowl by a guy stripping the ball after possession then the Giant receiver could have had it jarred loose. Please explain to me why it should be touchdown when a running back reaches the ball over the goal line and has it knocked out of his hands. Shouldn't that be a fumble then?


Its simple. Ball carrier in the field of play with possession, when the ball touches the plane of the endzone, it is a TD. When a player does not have possession, they can be hit to prevent gaining possession,whether in the field of play or end zone.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
wpr (1h) : So you are saying Jordy is 150-150 for Sunday U2?
uffda udfa (1h) : Jordy 50-50 for Sunday per Schefter.
uffda udfa (1h) : Jordy 50-50 for Sunday per Schefter.
uffda udfa (1h) : Jordy 50-50 for Sunday per Schefter.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Kidding, you might be right. I don't know.
Zero2Cool (1h) : hahaha no
steveishere (1h) : yeah after he was lined up inside
Zero2Cool (2h) : He did get some hurries and QB hits Sunday night though
Zero2Cool (2h) : I'd rather he just killed QB's than left.
wpr (10h) : well the good news is CM3 only has 1 more yr left on his contract.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Clay is useless in middle. Barely better outside.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Chuck Norris would have been scared.
steveishere (14h) : We should bring in Datone and run with him/brooks/fackrell rotation at OLB and let Clay play from inside where he actually makes an impact
uffda udfa (14h) : Last night, Jermichael Finley insinuates Rodgers was scared but quickly deletes tweet.
uffda udfa (15h) : Daniels MRI came back clean. Day to Day.
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : Unless he doesn`t want to be here, I still think he would be a great pick-up as he he knows our system.
uffda udfa (16h) : Datone apparently visited with Detroit, first.
uffda udfa (16h) : Datone Jones makes first FA visit to... New England
uffda udfa (17h) : Twitter doc, David Chao says Sam Bradford may miss 7-8 weeks.
uffda udfa (18h) : Or Jordy not Jody.
uffda udfa (18h) : Wilde has a picture up on Jody's knee. Looks like he banged his knee. Not good.
uffda udfa (19h) : Jordy should be fine but may miss a few weeks. Not season ending.
gbguy20 (19h) : had matt ryan, dFreeman, ty Montgomery and Davante Adams playing for me last night. worked out well
gbguy20 (19h) : before last nights game i was down by 70. now im up by 22.5. need the gints to stop stafford tonight
gbguy20 (19h) : it's nice seeing the bengals and bears up next
Zero2Cool (19h) : lol i can see if I can wrap the link into a clickable link. best of both worlds
gbguy20 (19h) : its a damn tease. now i have to google it
gbguy20 (19h) : especially since phones can't click links in shout and I can't copy and paste it either
Zero2Cool (20h) : The Packers and the Village of Ashwaubenon will officially dedicate a new roadway in Ashwaubenon as “Ron Wolf Way” tomorrow
Zero2Cool (20h) : can you stop posting links in shout and start a thread so they can be discussed? that'd be great ;)
uffda udfa (20h) : On Jordy: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/profootballdoc/sd-sp-pfd-jordy-nelson-injury-packers-0917-story.html
Zero2Cool (20h) : Aaron Nagler: I'll be very surprised if King isn't the starter opposite House next Sunday.
Zero2Cool (20h) : on*
Cheesey (21h) : "In the road?" Roadkill, maybe! On the road? Yuck! LOL!
Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : We're a long ways away from being contenders in the road.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / TedThompsonsShades

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Around The NFL / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

Headlines