[ Sign In ]
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:56:54 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

Posts: 12,091
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 266
Applause Received: 689

Compiled the comparison through 11 weeks of the 2011 Packers defense to the 2012 Packers defense.

Only category that we have regressed... # of picks. Otherwise, it is improvement across the board.

*edit.. we have given up one more rushing TD to date. We are screwed. Weeeee!!
File Attachment(s):
Packers D Comp Through Week 11.pdf (44kb) downloaded 25 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.

UserPostedImage
thanks 6 users applaud Pack93z for this useful post.
Sponsors
Offline dfosterf  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 4:15:35 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,460
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 106
Applause Received: 253

In the time-frame when Reggie White was out there, I remember honestly looking forward to our defense going out on the field, largely just to see what the hell was going to happen next, and in a good way, 99 44/100% of the time. That was a good feeling to have. A tough standard to live up to, but damn it felt good to be a gangster.

THAT difference between pre- Reggie and post Reggie felt profound, to me. I love a guy like Clay, but he didn't come to a sucky-team like Reggie did.

Big Grin

Edited by member Tuesday, November 20, 2012 4:26:04 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

UserPostedImage
damn skippy I'm an owner. I currently own a full .00001924537805515393 % of the Green Bay Packers.



Offline GermanGilbert  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:17:16 PM(UTC)
GermanGilbert

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 510
Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 46

Great stuff, your statistics, thanks a lot for sharing. Even more impressive having in mind which bunch of guys put those numbers together compared to last year.
blank
Offline olds70supreme  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:48:07 PM(UTC)
olds70supreme

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 118
Joined: 8/10/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 7
Applause Received: 8

Interesting chart, would be nice to see a similar one at the end of the regular season. One question, is Sack % calculated as sacks/defensive play or sacks/passing play?
blank
Offline Pack93z  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 2:12:52 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

Posts: 12,091
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 266
Applause Received: 689

Originally Posted by: olds70supreme Go to Quoted Post
Interesting chart, would be nice to see a similar one at the end of the regular season. One question, is Sack % calculated as sacks/defensive play or sacks/passing play?


Sack % = sacks/(pass att + Sacks)
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.

UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:00:14 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,582
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1,361
Applause Received: 720

I'll bet the number of big plays has been cut back as well.

edit- this year GB has given up 38 plays of 20 yards or more. 5 of 40 or more.
I don't have the numbers after 11 weeks but for all of 2011 it is 80 & 12. Looks like they will finsih well below last year.
One does not simply walk into Mordor.


UserPostedImage

Offline Porforis  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:18:28 PM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,604
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Applause Given: 140
Applause Received: 294

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
I'll bet the number of big plays has been cut back as well.

edit- this year GB has given up 38 plays of 20 yards or more. 5 of 40 or more.
I don't have the numbers after 11 weeks but for all of 2011 it is 80 & 12. Looks like they will finsih well below last year.


A very big part of that is greatly improved tackling, especially in the cornerback position. Plenty of those 20 or 40 yard gains started out as 10, 15 yard gains until someone whiffed on a tackle or tried knocking the receiver off his feet instead of wrapping him up.
UserPostedImage
Offline macbob  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:40:02 PM(UTC)
macbob

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,512
Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 169
Applause Received: 133

Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Only category that we have regressed... # of picks. Otherwise, it is improvement across the board.


Interesting to note though that the opponents QB rating is lower this year even with the decreased # of picks.
UserPostedImage
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 4:52:04 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,391
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 22
Applause Received: 94

I love it when Packer players prove me wrong!!!!

This is what I posted day after the draft this year.

"Day after draft, I'm gonna stick with my original prediction.
Ted was busy in this years draft, Hitting on position of needs the 1st 4 picks.
As it is at this time every year there is hope that the rookies will come in and give an immediate upgrade.

Perry has the best chance to start.

Worthy and Daniels should get some rotation work, but don't see them as 1st year starters.

I like the Hayward and Mcmillian picks, but don't see either making a big splash the first year."


Pack93 that's a great breakdown.

You pointed out the drop off in interceptions so far this year, will be curious to check that stat at end of year, seems we have at least one "Ball Hawk" DB who is now a very important part of The D.
"OUTSIDE THE SKY IS FALLING!! IN HERE EVERYTHING'S FINE!!!"
Offline DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:45:06 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,578
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 337
Applause Received: 639

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan Go to Quoted Post
I love it when Packer players prove me wrong!!!!

This is what I posted day after the draft this year.

"Day after draft, I'm gonna stick with my original prediction.
Ted was busy in this years draft, Hitting on position of needs the 1st 4 picks.
As it is at this time every year there is hope that the rookies will come in and give an immediate upgrade.

Perry has the best chance to start.

Worthy and Daniels should get some rotation work, but don't see them as 1st year starters.

I like the Hayward and Mcmillian picks, but don't see either making a big splash the first year."


Pack93 that's a great breakdown.

You pointed out the drop off in interceptions so far this year, will be curious to check that stat at end of year, seems we have at least one "Ball Hawk" DB who is now a very important part of The D.


Buckeye, I think I'm going to start asking you for advice - and whatever you say, I'll do the opposite. Big Grin
UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:55:43 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,922
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 493

Sweet!
We progressed on the two stats that matter - Sacks & QB rating. Applause
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline Pack93z  
#12 Posted : Monday, November 26, 2012 10:57:55 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

Posts: 12,091
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 266
Applause Received: 689

Updated through week 12.
File Attachment(s):
Packers D Comp Through Week 12.pdf (45kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.

UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#13 Posted : Monday, December 3, 2012 8:50:17 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

Posts: 12,091
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 266
Applause Received: 689

Updated through week 13.
File Attachment(s):
Packers D Comp Through Week 13.pdf (46kb) downloaded 7 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.

UserPostedImage
Offline CaliforniaCheez  
#14 Posted : Monday, December 3, 2012 12:05:15 PM(UTC)
CaliforniaCheez

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 901
Joined: 9/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 4
Applause Received: 112

It is interesting when you compare stats to the rest of the league.

Passing Defense:

The Packers are 3rd in opponents completion %

3rd in sack yardage

4th in sacks

6th in opponents passer rating

6th in INT's

9th in opponents yards per pass attempt


As for rushing defense, it slipped in standings Sunday.

16th in yards per game

25th in yards per attempt

But their opponents rush against them the 9th fewest times.




blank
thanks 3 users applaud CaliforniaCheez for this useful post.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.