Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Mattheiw  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:37:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Algeria
Joined: 12/12/2012(UTC)
Location: Birmingham
I would take whichever the D gives you and use the other to keep them off balance.
Offline blueleopard  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/22/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 169
I don't know how this relates to the Packers.

But didn't you see how Rodgers got sacked 8x in the first half against Seattle?

That's why you establish the run first. Balance. Like you said.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 12/13/2012(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#3 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 7:04:44 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
I will not buy into putting one first over the other.. pass or run first.

But the key is to have balance in any shape while picking their bones clean upon their weaknesses or where you may have a matchup advantage.

There are teams in which you can get away with being unbalanced.. but there are teams in which you have to maintain balance to counter their strengths. Currently a team like the Giants are a defense in which you have to maintain balance or they are going to eat your passing game alive.

Example.

In the Giants 8 wins.. the opposition had a pass ratio of over 60%.. and the Giants win by an average of over 2 touchdowns.

However int he Giants 5 losses.. they have a point margin of -5.. but the pass ratio of the opposition in those game is ~49.5%.

If you are going to beat that team, your better odds are to remain balanced to keep that pass rush at bay.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Dulak on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#4 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:28:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Defenses basically have one extra player because they don't have to match up with the QB. And defense typically uses that extra man in pass coverage (fs). They will start the game trying to stop the run with equal numbers, 7 on 7, 8 on 8. The reason they say run first, is because if they can run when the numbers are equal, it forces the defense to bring that extra man up for run support opening up the passing game. single coverage on everybody.

There are exceptions like MN and other running teams where defenses will stack the box to begin until the offense can prove they can beat the single coverage.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Pack93z on 12/13/2012(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#5 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:41:13 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Defenses basically have one extra player because they don't have to match up with the QB. And defense typically uses that extra man in pass coverage (fs). They will start the game trying to stop the run with equal numbers, 7 on 7, 8 on 8. The reason they say run first, is because if they can run when the numbers are equal, it forces the defense to bring that extra man up for run support opening up the passing game. single coverage on everybody.

There are exceptions like MN and other running teams where defenses will stack the box to begin until the offense can prove they can beat the single coverage.


Agreed in concept and why they state it to be... but I have been a fan of the scripting of the first 15 to prod the defense a bit and to gauge how they are reacting to formations, movement and the plays themselves based on film study and tenancies. Getting a feel for their game plan while planting seeds to be cultivated later.

I think the a more prudent method than trying to force one aspect or another of your offense.

Hence.. not buying into one before the other.. attack the defensive schemes specifically.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#6 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:08:23 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Agreed in concept and why they state it to be... but I have been a fan of the scripting of the first 15 to prod the defense a bit and to gauge how they are reacting to formations, movement and the plays themselves based on film study and tenancies. Getting a feel for their game plan while planting seeds to be cultivated later.

I think the a more prudent method than trying to force one aspect or another of your offense.

Hence.. not buying into one before the other.. attack the defensive schemes specifically.


I hate the term scripting. Because it makes people think it is we are going to run these plays in this order and that is incorrect. In reality all that is scripted is one play, and after that, it is a selection of plays based on situation, down and distance.

First play, breaks for huge gain and gets down to the 1. 2nd play of script is 5 wide all running 15 yard routes. Going to look really funny.
Offline Pack93z  
#7 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:39:56 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I hate the term scripting. Because it makes people think it is we are going to run these plays in this order and that is incorrect. In reality all that is scripted is one play, and after that, it is a selection of plays based on situation, down and distance.

First play, breaks for huge gain and gets down to the 1. 2nd play of script is 5 wide all running 15 yard routes. Going to look really funny.


Of course it is not completely static.. but they are more inter joined than the remainder of the play calling going forward.

So what else should it be called? An Array of plays? lol.. Scripting is a term that is used and people are going to get the idea.

But the concept is early to force different looks to force the defense to show their hand.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#8 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:42:41 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Of course it is not completely static.. but they are more inter joined than the remainder of the play calling going forward.

So what else should it be called? An Array of plays? lol.. Scripting is a term that is used and people are going to get the idea.

But the concept is early to force different looks to force the defense to show their hand.


Depends how the "script" is planned.

It can be scripted as run first, to try and get the safety into the box, or it can be scripted pass first to get the safety out of the box. Or it can be scripted balanced. It can be scripted for specific mix of formations to see the defenses response. Or it can be scripted as, if they do this we do that. The script is also sometimes to setup plays later on. Run a bunch of slants early, so the slugo is available later.

The script, is just the beginning of a gameplan. And all it should be called is teh plan.
Offline Pack93z  
#9 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:49:08 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post

The script, is just the beginning of a gameplan. And all it should be called is teh plan.


Saying the same thing .. just different words. Hence why I used the term scripting, usually the first x amount of plays. Not the entire game plan.

But the "plan" within the overall "game plan".. lol... fine, most refer to it as a script with the understanding that it is not static.

But I know what you are saying.. some take that literally.

Now.. can we start to rename other terms that don't literally mean what they are labeled. ;)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#10 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:21:00 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Saying the same thing .. just different words. Hence why I used the term scripting, usually the first x amount of plays. Not the entire game plan.

But the "plan" within the overall "game plan".. lol... fine, most refer to it as a script with the understanding that it is not static.

But I know what you are saying.. some take that literally.

Now.. can we start to rename other terms that don't literally mean what they are labeled. ;)


It wouldn't surprise me if some people think a punt is part of the script.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (1h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (1h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (1h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (1h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (1h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (1h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (1h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (1h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (1h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (1h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (1h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (1h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
uffda udfa (1h) : Mike Pereira explained on Twitter what he should've on FOX.
Smokey (1h) : Keeping them thread separated is the key. Fan Shout is for any and all members to post as they please. No one voted you King U2 .
uffda udfa (1h) : This is for NFL stuff. Not crock pots or crack pots.
uffda udfa (1h) : Shout is not back alley. Not your forum either.
Smokey (1h) : Cooking, or travel, or our favorite movie have every right in this forum.
Smokey (1h) : It is not, YOUR FORUM . Even politics is tolerated in the Back Ally .
uffda udfa (2h) : I love cooking but this is a Packers forum not Iron Chef.
Smokey (2h) : Anyone, man or woman, that can cook does not need to always depend upon others to cook their food for them.
Smokey (2h) : The greater majority of successful restaurants are owned/and run by Men.
Smokey (2h) : Making fun of the art of cooking only demonstrates a lack of sophistication.
Smokey (2h) : Most of the finest chefs in the world are men.
hardrocker950 (3h) : lol
uffda udfa (3h) : Best pressure cooker talk on the net!
hardrocker950 (5h) : Time to get the CB situation sorted out
Smokey (5h) : DON'T DELAY, JOIN TODAY !
musccy (7h) : Sorry, but no to shields. 9 mil better spent elsewhere.
uffda udfa (7h) : Sam Shields still having headaches but wants to continue playing.
uffda udfa (7h) : Not harsh. Another failure and playoff embarrassment.
uffda udfa (7h) : Aaron cried a little when asked about Jordy playing today.
GoPack1984 (8h) : Dismal season? I think that's too harsh.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

2h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Announcements / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson


Packers Headlines