Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#11 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:35:43 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Not exactly true, and irrelevant on this topic. The Commish does not make these rules changes.


Who has stated that he makes the rule changes?

The point here is the he is using his position of the commissioner to be nothing more than a PR mouthpiece for the owners.

Hence, if he wants his name to be linked with such topics, it is natural that he will be assigned public perception of blame or praise for it.

Why bring something to light, that hasn't been discussed for some time, that could be and should be left for discussion with the union (ad hoc players) as it is part of the CBA before discussing or pushing it publicly. All this is going to do is continue to create space between the owners and players, which is not in the best of the league.

And there lies the overall problem, his job is to conduct business that is in the best interest of the entire league.. all entities. And honestly that is where he is failing.. a walking contradiction of statements, many of which should be ran through the channels well before publicly pressing an issue.

Now granted, some of that is to gauge public/fan/media interest and feedback, but it also costs in terms of relationships with specific entities of the league. His failing so to speak.

For the record, the 2006 version of the bylaws for reference of the scope of duties of the commissioner for those that might want to review.. see page 28 of the linked document. [grin1]
File Attachment(s):
NFL Bylaws.pdf (1,143kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#12 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:09:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,064
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Not exactly true, and irrelevant on this topic. The Commish does not make these rules changes.


The changes are made by the Owners, however, the commissioner presents many possible solutions or changes. Therefore the commissioner is NOT absolved of accountability in HIS outlandish suggestions that are made public.

There is no mistake about it, he, the commissioner wants to put HIS stamp on the NFL and changes.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#13 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:11:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Who has stated that he makes the rule changes?

The point here is the he is using his position of the commissioner to be nothing more than a PR mouthpiece for the owners.

Hence, if he wants his name to be linked with such topics, it is natural that he will be assigned public perception of blame or praise for it.

Why bring something to light, that hasn't been discussed for some time, that could be and should be left for discussion with the union (ad hoc players) as it is part of the CBA before discussing or pushing it publicly. All this is going to do is continue to create space between the owners and players, which is not in the best of the league.

And there lies the overall problem, his job is to conduct business that is in the best interest of the entire league.. all entities. And honestly that is where he is failing.. a walking contradiction of statements, many of which should be ran through the channels well before publicly pressing an issue.

Now granted, some of that is to gauge public/fan/media interest and feedback, but it also costs in terms of relationships with specific entities of the league. His failing so to speak.

BTW.. if you want the full scope of the Commish's duties and length of control.. see page 28 of the linked document. [grin1]


Almost everybody blames him for rule changes. It is always, goodell is taking the hits out of the game, goodell is making it flag football. Goodell is protecting QB's, goodell is making it a passing league. Look at the title of this thread. Goodell thinking of extending playoffs. It is not him thinking it, it is the league, the owners. Sure he could come out and not say anything about what was discussed, but then, when the decisions were finished, he would have to stand up and announce This is what was done, and he would be criticized just as much for protecting the owners and league by keeping it all quiet.

Goodell is damned if he does damned if he don't.

And they can do it without approval of the NFLPA. the cba says the players need to approve expansion of the regular season. But everything is covered for the playoffs as long as they don't add weeks. Wildcard, division, conference. They can add two wildcard games, and the player can do nothing about it. But again, that is the Owners, the league. Got Goodell, he may agree or not, but it isn't his decision.

It is said it comes with the job, but that doesn't make it right. I myself understand that while he is the face, the choices are most always not his. the only ones that have really been his, has been the level of fines, and punishment.
Offline Pack93z  
#14 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:22:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
Okay.. yes the thread title is bouncing it.


But I concur with your statement of facts, but it is not perception.

Now, on the fines and hits being fined. The rule is no helmet to helmet contact, but it is under his watch that they are inconsistently enforcing that rule. It is under his watch that they are determining which hits are being subject to discipline, including the threat of suspension to Ed Reed early this season.

So no, he cannot be absolved of that, while he might not be directly associated with the rulings.. it is upon his watch with input decided by partially of people appointed by him.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:45:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,064
PackFanWithTwins wants to wrap Roger Goodell in bubble wrap and protect him from everything! RG can do no wrong!!! Blame someone else!!!


Disgusting!


I bet if he were to get a parking ticket PackFanWithTwins would blame the Owners for that too!


The NFL is making their game flag football, not one person and no one has said much otherwise.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#16 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:58:07 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Okay.. yes the thread title is bouncing it.


But I concur with your statement of facts, but it is not perception.

Now, on the fines and hits being fined. The rule is no helmet to helmet contact, but it is under his watch that they are inconsistently enforcing that rule. It is under his watch that they are determining which hits are being subject to discipline, including the threat of suspension to Ed Reed early this season.

So no, he cannot be absolved of that, while he might not be directly associated with the rulings.. it is upon his watch with input decided by partially of people appointed by him.


Which is why I have stated that I have and will continue to criticize him for how he has been punishing. I can't blame goodell for the defenseless player rule being created, but I can for how he has enforced and punished for it.

Can't blame Goodell for the owners locking out the refs. But I can blame him for how unprepared and bad the replacement officials were.

And can't blame Goodell for the owners talking about expanding the playoffs.
Offline Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:05:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post


And can't blame Goodell for the owners talking about expanding the playoffs.


Agreed... but we can blame him for taking it public, thus subjecting himself (really is name) to public scrutiny. And basically causing more friction amongst the entities he is suppose to be representing.
Offline Porforis  
#18 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25:08 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 346
Applause Received: 645
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Agreed... but we can blame him for taking it public, thus subjecting himself (really is name) to public scrutiny. And basically causing more friction amongst the entities he is suppose to be representing.


For all you know, he knows it's a terrible idea and is making it public before it gains any significant traction amongst the owners precisely because he knows it will get a negative reaction.
Offline Pack93z  
#19 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:34:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
For all you know, he knows it's a terrible idea and is making it public before it gains any significant traction amongst the owners precisely because he knows it will get a negative reaction.


Agreed.. but then he is taking the sword of criticism. But isn't that still being a shill for the owners and taking away from what should be an exciting time (verge of the playoffs) for the league?

But you are correct, he could be the "hero" we the fans deserve and just destroying his legacy in the process.

I just don't think he would take that approach in a week in which he basically was overturned by PT.. and his "credibility" with the players is at an low point.
Offline Formo  
#20 Posted : Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:18:14 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 159
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
The contradictions that are the Commish.

Player safety and reducing the impacts of hits is vital to the game.

vs.

Lets add more games, thus more hits along the way, to the league.


It isn't about fan value, it isn't that the fans are screaming we need more. It is the concept that the owners think they can squeeze more green blood from the stone.

Never mind they are neutering the game in the process of the current slate of games. Creating rule to promote more scoring; and when the defenses adjust.. add more layers of rules to promote scoring. Making the hit zone an unrealistic target more and more by the week because they are getting bent over backwards in litigation.

Yet, adding more games to the slate seems to be the importance?

Reality is... the owners know they are going to get spanked in court very soon and don't want a dip in the bottom line of their cash flow, so why not take more off the backs of fans and the TV networks.


Don't be fooled my friend. He, nor the NFL, are TRULY concerned about player safety and reducing vicious hits. They are concerned about implementing rules, regulations, and penalties so that they will be absolved from any cases in the courts. One can't sue the NFL for trying to cover up knowledge that football is a dangerous sport if the NFL implements all these rules and regulations to the game (successfully changing it on a nearly fundamental level).

Oh, wait.. You just said that.. =)

That aside.. I actually like the idea of more playoff games. But only if they expand the league by at least 2 more teams (preferably 4)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
5 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (1h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (1h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (2h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (3h) : go pack go ?
wpr (3h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (3h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (3h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (3h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (3h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (4h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (4h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (4h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (6h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (6h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (6h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (6h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (6h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (6h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (8h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (8h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (8h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (8h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (8h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (8h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (8h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (8h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (8h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (8h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (8h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (8h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (8h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
now / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines