Green Bay Packers Forum
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Wade  
#1 Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 4:45:02 PM(UTC)
Adrian Peterson or Jamaal Charles?

I know consensus is going to say Peterson. But that 5.8 per rush 5-year average is just sick. I mean, it's more than a 1/2 yard bigger than Jim Brown's career ave. And 3/4 of a yard bigger than Peterson's.

And it's not like KC has any better "complementary offensive players" than Minnesota has.
Sponsor
Offline nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:04:03 PM(UTC)
Which one's a better receiver?
Offline GermanGilbert  
#3 Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:24:03 PM(UTC)
Neither of them, with Aaron Rodgers under center there's just no need to spend big bucks on an elite RB. That said, if I really HAVE to take one, I'd take AD 24/7. The Chiefs produced some elite RBs in the last couple of years (Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, Jamaal Charles), so that might also be a system thing like with the Broncos a couple of years ago. AD in contrast is just outstanding because he's AD.
Offline nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:31:59 PM(UTC)
GermanGilbert said: Go to Quoted Post
Neither of them, with Aaron Rodgers under center there's just no need to spend big bucks on an elite RB. That said, if I really HAVE to take one, I'd take AD 24/7. The Chiefs produced some elite RBs in the last couple of years (Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, Jamaal Charles), so that might also be a system thing like with the Broncos a couple of years ago. AD in contrast is just outstanding because he's AD.


Which one is better at pass pro?
Offline gbguy20  
#5 Posted : Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:05:34 PM(UTC)
AP without question.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 12/28/2012(UTC)
Offline PackerTraxx  
#6 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 7:20:31 AM(UTC)
Which one earns less money.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 12/28/2012(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#7 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 8:08:36 AM(UTC)
I might not pick either and go with Lynch.

Anyway.. it is truly sad that neither Charles nor Peterson have a QB that can exploit the defense at the moment off their efforts. Minnesota at least has someone that may grow into the position, KC is just a freaking mess.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#8 Posted : Friday, December 28, 2012 8:26:04 AM(UTC)
If this is which over their career, the answer is Peterson without a doubt. If the question is from today forward it would be tougher. Peterson does have a lot more miles on his tires. I still think I would go with Peterson, I think he has the better ability to gain when there is not a hole. And more of his big runs seem to happen through the middle and then bouncing to open ground, where Charles seems to me to do more of his on edge runs.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter