Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
7 Pages«<567

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
dfosterf  
#121 Posted : Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32:51 PM(UTC)
I think I remember that the Vikings had only 4 outdoor games this year.

They are essentially a dome team, so scheduling was good for them.

I wonder how they did in those games as they prepare to play the Pack in Lambeau. I know the outcome of one of them. [grin1]

Anyone know?


SINCITYCHEEZE  
#122 Posted : Monday, December 31, 2012 2:53:55 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
I think I remember that the Vikings had only 4 outdoor games this year.

They are essentially a dome team, so scheduling was good for them.

I wonder how they did in those games as they prepare to play the Pack in Lambeau. I know the outcome of one of them. [grin1]

Anyone know?


Packers,Redskins,Suckhawks,Bares.Only four outdoor games this year.ALL FOUR LOSES!!!

wpr  
#123 Posted : Monday, December 31, 2012 2:54:54 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
I think I remember that the Vikings had only 4 outdoor games this year.

They are essentially a dome team, so scheduling was good for them.

I wonder how they did in those games as they prepare to play the Pack in Lambeau. I know the outcome of one of them. [grin1]

Anyone know?




Regular Season
Wk Date Game
1 Sep 09 JAC 23 @ MIN 26
2 Sep 16 MIN 20 @ IND 23
3 Sep 23 SF 13 @ MIN 24
4 Sep 30 MIN 20 @ DET 13
5 Oct 07 TEN 7 @ MIN 30
6 Oct 14 MIN 26 @ WAS 38 Adrian Peterson 79 Yds (MIN)
7 Oct 21 ARI 14 @ MIN 21
8 Oct 25 TB 36 @ MIN 17
9 Nov 04 MIN 20 @ SEA 30 Adrian Peterson 182 Yds (MIN)
10 Nov 11 DET 24 @ MIN 34
11 Bye
12 Nov 25 MIN 10 @ CHI 28 Adrian Peterson 108 Yds (MIN)
13 Dec 02 MIN 14 @ GB 23 Adrian Peterson 210 Yds (MIN)
14 Dec 09 CHI 14 @ MIN 21
15 Dec 16 MIN 36 @ STL 22
16 Dec 23 MIN 23 @ HOU 6
17 Dec 30 GB 34 @ MIN 37
play2win  
#124 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:56:21 AM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
He couldn't change this our defense promptly put us down all game long. We had no control over this game. This was a very very bad game for the defense. Not really looking forward to watching this crew in the playoffs at all.


This is a defeatist approach, one that will lose you a game every single time. On our first two series of the game, we ran twice, passed 4 times, subsequently punted twice too.

AD is just that. All Day. McCarthy should look at him as he would Brady, either Manning, Brees, you name it: keep that offensive potency off the field as long as possible by pounding the rock with the run.

We had a ton of time to get back in this after coughing it up early.

I guarantee this: We rush 30 times with our RBs we win this game. Easy.
wpr  
#125 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 7:12:28 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
This is a defeatist approach, one that will lose you a game every single time. On our first two series of the game, we ran twice, passed 4 times, subsequently punted twice too.

AD is just that. All Day. McCarthy should look at him as he would Brady, either Manning, Brees, you name it: keep that offensive potency off the field as long as possible by pounding the rock with the run.

We had a ton of time to get back in this after coughing it up early.

I guarantee this: We rush 30 times with our RBs we win this game. Easy.


not so. GB ran the ball twice and got 2 total yards. Running the ball 30 times with Grant might have yielded 30- 40 yards and a real asswhupping.

In both series they were faced with definite passing situations (after unsuccessful runs) and MN loaded up and came after AR. He and the WR didn't have the time to run their routes and thus 2 punts.

play2win  
#126 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:21:09 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
not so. GB ran the ball twice and got 2 total yards. Running the ball 30 times with Grant might have yielded 30- 40 yards and a real asswhupping.

In both series they were faced with definite passing situations (after unsuccessful runs) and MN loaded up and came after AR. He and the WR didn't have the time to run their routes and thus 2 punts.



All the more reason to run v. pass. And by that I mean a run oriented, pound the football approach. Would have taken all the heat off of Rodgers, and opened up the passing game. Watch what happens Saturday night. Mike will be certain to run a whole lot more, at least I hope so.

Harris had a 5.8 yd per carry average in the first half, on only 6 carries...
Yerko  
#127 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:22:50 PM(UTC)
I feel confident that the Packers will win Saturday night. Vikings have not won a game outdoors this season and they have only played 4 games in 32 degree or less weather in the past 8 seasons.

Ponder was able to pull it together for that last game but he is no all-star and I don't think he can do it two games in a row, especially with the second game being a Lambeau.

Ponder's stats in his outdoor losses:

@Washington- 35/52, 352 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT (Peterson rushed for 79 yards, 0 TD)

@Seattle- 11/22, 63 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (Peterson rushed for 182, 2 TD)

@Chicago- 22/43, 159 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (Peterson rushed for 108, 0 TD)

@ Green Bay- 12/25, 119 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT (Peterson rushed for 210, 1 TD)

I wish there was a trend like being behind by so many points or something, but there isn't. The Vikings are just not a good team outdoors. Also worth mentioning, they had Percy Harvin for the first two games which should have given Ponder better options.

nerdmann  
#128 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:52:52 PM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
I feel confident that the Packers will win Saturday night. Vikings have not won a game outdoors this season and they have only played 4 games in 32 degree or less weather in the past 8 seasons.

Ponder was able to pull it together for that last game but he is no all-star and I don't think he can do it two games in a row, especially with the second game being a Lambeau.

Ponder's stats in his outdoor losses:

@Washington- 35/52, 352 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT (Peterson rushed for 79 yards, 0 TD)

@Seattle- 11/22, 63 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (Peterson rushed for 182, 2 TD)

@Chicago- 22/43, 159 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (Peterson rushed for 108, 0 TD)

@ Green Bay- 12/25, 119 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT (Peterson rushed for 210, 1 TD)

I wish there was a trend like being behind by so many points or something, but there isn't. The Vikings are just not a good team outdoors. Also worth mentioning, they had Percy Harvin for the first two games which should have given Ponder better options.



Whst you say is true.

But that doesn't mean our guys don't have to show up. And THAT, is what worries me.
wpr  
#129 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 1:01:09 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Whst you say is true.

But that doesn't mean our guys don't have to show up. And THAT, is what worries me.


I am worried too. I am worried Aaron Rodgers will try to break all Favre's playoff records in this one game on one single play.
nerdmann  
#130 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 1:36:18 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
I am worried too. I am worried Aaron Rodgers will try to break all Favre's playoff records in this one game on one single play.


I am worried he'll hold onto the ball too long looking deep.

But I'm even more worried about the rest of the team taking the day off.
warhawk  
#131 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 2:07:02 PM(UTC)
I, for one, am not worried.
The Packers D had an off day but did not take the day off and there is a difference. The effort was there they just didn't play very well.

I am not worried because the Vikes played about as good as they possibly are capable of playing and barely won. They had the crowd and the jump on us early and that essentially set the tone for the rest of the game and how it was played.

The tendency in recent years is teams facing a little more adversity then the top seeds are winning the SB. The Packers were not in a good position after the first several games and turned the season around. They've been here and done that.

Sometimes you just have to take yur hat off and in this case and this one time I will for the Vikes last week. They played hard and mistake free for 60 minutes.

Now they are rewarded with coming to our place and I expect we beat the hell out of them.


















User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#132 Posted : Wednesday, January 2, 2013 2:40:32 PM(UTC)
Well I for one hope McCarthy doesn't try to "establish the run" for the entire first quarter - when we can throw the ball at will on that secondary. We didn't have a first down until the second quarter which is unacceptable. There is no fine line between stubborn and stupidity when you factor arrogance first.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages«<567
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Hi 😊😉
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : I guess I should have did a refresh when I walked away from the computer.
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Peters is 25 with one year left on his contract at just over $3M
Zero2Cool (11h) : Mel Kiper sticks with Marcus Davenport to GB in 2nd mock
Zero2Cool (13h) : As for Marcus Peters, how old is he an what's his contract years left?
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers got tired of Sitton's antics.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Sitton was released not because of play or salary, but personality. He will not be re-signed.
TheKanataThrilla (13h) : If we are planning on possibly cutting Cobb I can see the 2nd round pick. A second round pick for Peters is a pretty good deal.
Smokey (14h) : I'd offer Cobb + a 3rd round pick + a 6th round pick in 2019 for the CB Peters from KC.
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : I guess that is a highter round pick
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : Suggestion was a 2nd round pick. I would want a lower round pick. I think that is too much. A 3rd or 4th seems about right.
Smokey (15h) : Cobb and WHAT PICK ?
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : A suggestion I saw was a trade of Cobb and a Pick for Peters. I think that would be a great move.
Smokey (19h) : Sitton was drafted be GB in 2008, not a young man at this point, but still is a "bear" of a man.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : Sitton? Maybe if the price is right.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : I doubt the Packers would try to resign Sutton. But who knows? If the price is right?
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Bears declining option on Josh Sitton. He'll be Free Agent.
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Chiefs CB Marcus Peters trade rumors -- come to Packers!
Smokey (20-Feb) : Join us in Packershome and be part of the discussion today .
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Elizabeeth ... good bye
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Saturday, August 19, 2017
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : That's dedicated spammng!
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : For some reason, I had to flush my DNS cache to access this site from my laptop today.
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : I prefer toads to frogs, Smokey, thank you very much.
Rockmolder (19-Feb) : My girlfriends says thanks, Rourke.
Smokey (19-Feb) : Nonstopdrivel that you most likely say to all the frogs you meet .
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : Rockmolder's avatar is so fucking sexy.
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : never seen the interview before. tough to listen to. can't believe it was 7 years ago
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : just watched a nick Collins tribute on yourube. the end featured an interview with nick reflecting on his injury
buckeyepackfan (17-Feb) : Saints De'Vante Harris nothing but a POS!!!!! Look up his tweetes on Florida killings!!
Nonstopdrivel (17-Feb) : They're laying new gas line near my house. The trucks are all from a company in Madison.
Smokey (14-Feb) : 2018 Hall o Fame Game/Aug.2,2018/Ravens vs Bears
Zero2Cool (13-Feb) : Based off 2017 records, Packers have toughest schedule for 2018
Smokey (13-Feb) : Wow, tough new 2018 Packer Schedule !
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : I don't know anything about him though. He good? Bad?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Random Babble / Cheesey

9h / Random Babble / Smokey

11h / Random Babble / Pack93z

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

16-Feb / Around The NFL / Cheesey

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13-Feb / Football Familiarity / Smokey

Headlines