Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
9 Pages«<56789>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#61 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:21:26 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 5,748
Applause Received: 1,303
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I've said it before and I'll say it again - football evolves. You cannot run Bart Starr's offense and expect it to do well today. You cannot run Joe Montana's offense and expect it to do well today.

Things keep changing. The WCO is outdated (but its concepts are used by all 32 teams). If you run a strictly WCO, enjoy watching the Playoffs from home.


You can't run Starr's offense, because they changed the rules to favor the passing game. The WCO was developed to take advantage of these rule changes. It is based on fundamentals, high percentage passing. This does not mean ONLY short passes. When the DBs start to cheat up to jump the slants and short passes, then you throw deep over their heads.

It also involves alot of misdirection in the forms of screens and traps.

Now granted, the NFL has been favoring offenses nowadays to promote high scoring games and tv-ratings-grabbing highlight reels. So yes, maybe that does favor us a little. There are many rules now that hurt the defense, which I do believe are surreptitiously meant to help offenses. But I'm a pretty conservative guy. I like to adhere to fundamentals. To me, high percentage=success.

It's not like Jerry Rice and John Taylor never had long scoring plays. Our guys can get YAC too.
Offline zombieslayer  
#62 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:35:20 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
You can't run Starr's offense, because they changed the rules to favor the passing game. The WCO was developed to take advantage of these rule changes. It is based on fundamentals, high percentage passing. This does not mean ONLY short passes. When the DBs start to cheat up to jump the slants and short passes, then you throw deep over their heads.

It also involves alot of misdirection in the forms of screens and traps.

Now granted, the NFL has been favoring offenses nowadays to promote high scoring games and tv-ratings-grabbing highlight reels. So yes, maybe that does favor us a little. There are many rules now that hurt the defense, which I do believe are surreptitiously meant to help offenses. But I'm a pretty conservative guy. I like to adhere to fundamentals. To me, high percentage=success.

It's not like Jerry Rice and John Taylor never had long scoring plays. Our guys can get YAC too.


I totally get where you're coming from. But high percentage has changed. You're NOT gonna find quick slants as high percentage passes. LBs will be waiting to either smack the **** out of your WR or pick it off.

Defenses have evolved to take away the strengths of the WCO. So now, we gotta do something different.

Mike McCarthy's O is the shit. Seriously. It is. We setup deep and medium route passes and Aaron Rodgers is one of the few QB's in the NFL who can complete them consistently. Be thankful.

One thing that does suck - our OL isn't giving Aaron the time we need to give Aaron. If our OL was one measly second better, we'd be winning the SB with ease (of course, given our D remains in the top 10).
Offline steveishere  
#63 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:37:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 57
Applause Received: 1,560
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Drink every time the announcers say "coverage sack."


I'm gonna want to have more than 2 drinks sorry.
Offline nerdmann  
#64 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:03:51 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 5,748
Applause Received: 1,303
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I totally get where you're coming from. But high percentage has changed. You're NOT gonna find quick slants as high percentage passes. LBs will be waiting to either smack the **** out of your WR or pick it off.

Defenses have evolved to take away the strengths of the WCO. So now, we gotta do something different.

Mike McCarthy's O is the shit. Seriously. It is. We setup deep and medium route passes and Aaron Rodgers is one of the few QB's in the NFL who can complete them consistently. Be thankful.

One thing that does suck - our OL isn't giving Aaron the time we need to give Aaron. If our OL was one measly second better, we'd be winning the SB with ease (of course, given our D remains in the top 10).


You're talking about Lovey's 'cover two' scheme. True, they try to take away slants. But a normal WCO also has screens and traps. It's not just based upon one concept. The concept is, do this until they take that away, then take advantage of THAT weakness, which is left open. If the CB covers you to the inside, you go to the outside. We see this with those back shoulder plays. Haven't been hitting them as consistently this season, because our timing's been off.

Aaron's unique ability to throw accurately deep, combined with the talent Ted has given us at WR (and TE) are what make this offense. This affords Mike the ability to get out of what would normally be fundamentals and key on "matchups."

IMO, matchups AND fundamentals would be even more bitchin. Long as we win it all, I guess it's all good.
Offline Porforis  
#65 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:16:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 257
Applause Received: 511
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I agree, this offense is built around the big play. Part of it is MM, it's not just AR.

They both want to obliterate Favre from the record books.


If you're going to troll, don't spit out the same line over and over. It makes it very obvious.
Offline DakotaT  
#66 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:29:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,014
Applause Received: 2,042
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
If you're going to troll, don't spit out the same line over and over. It makes it very obvious.


He's not trolling - it is an observation he believes in and I don't think he is all that off base on his thinking. Like or not, Favre was a prick his last five years in GB. I don't think McCarthey liked him all that much, and I'm sure Rodgers set the bar that high to break Favre's records along with winning.

Favre is not the demigod a lot of Packers think he is. He acted like a petulant child when he arrived in GB, and left as a diva. Professionalism wasn't his thing, because his reputation was built on his talent.
Offline nerdmann  
#67 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:38:39 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 5,748
Applause Received: 1,303
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
He's not trolling - it is an observation he believes in and I don't think he is all that off base on his thinking. Like or not, Favre was a prick his last five years in GB. I don't think McCarthey liked him all that much, and I'm sure Rodgers set the bar that high to break Favre's records along with winning.

Favre is not the demigod a lot of Packers think he is. He acted like a petulant child when he arrived in GB, and left as a diva. Professionalism wasn't his thing, because his reputation was built on his talent.


lol Didn't know that was in dispute.

Aaron makes no secret of how the situation continues to "motive him."
Offline zombieslayer  
#68 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 3:36:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Nobody's gonna get Favre's records. Peyton Manning is gonna come closest and he might get some of them. But Aaron's not gonna get any of them. Nothing against Aaron. He's gonna retire a better QB than Favre. But simply put, Favre played too many games for his records to be broken. So I don't even think Mike McCarthy even considers Favre's records.

I know you believe that Nerd, but in this case, with all due respect, you're wrong. Aaron's gotta play another 13 or 14 years without injury and the chances of that happening are slim. I don't see Aaron playing another 10.
Offline doddpower  
#69 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 6:23:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,282
Applause Received: 910
Aaron Rodgers cares about nothing else other than winning Super Bowls. Sure, other individual achievements may cross their mind here and there, but the desire to be a champion trumps everything else. It's not even close. To say otherwise is silly. I could care less if Rodgers never breaks any of Favre's records, so long as he wins a few more championships, and I'm sure he feels the same. Rodgers has said before that he wants to win a few championships, and likely retire. He knows that's what really matters and means the most in the long-run, regardless of anything Favre did or did not do. He's not in competition with Favre, he's in competition with current NFL teams. Would he like to break some of Favre's records? Sure. Who the hell wouldn't? What player wouldn't like to break any monumental NFL milestones. However, I can say with some certainly that most would trade multiple championships, especially as a key contributor, to individual success. Obviously the best of both worlds would be to do both, and we should all hope all Packer players do such things, as that would likely result in an elite team. If the Packers would truly a "stat padding" team, we would see a lot more running up the score like the Saints and Patriots do. The Packers rarely do that, much to the dismay of some Packer fans. Once they secure a win, they get fairly conservative and move forward.

What a silly argument Nerd continually tries to make. Dakota is right, he's entitled to his opinion, even if it's completely wrong and nonsensical.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/6/2013(UTC), earthquake on 1/7/2013(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#70 Posted : Sunday, January 6, 2013 6:47:12 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 436
Applause Received: 1,205
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I've said it before and I'll say it again - football evolves. You cannot run Bart Starr's offense and expect it to do well today. You cannot run Joe Montana's offense and expect it to do well today.

Things keep changing. The WCO is outdated (but its concepts are used by all 32 teams). If you run a strictly WCO, enjoy watching the Playoffs from home.


I agree to a point, I think it is more cyclical on the defensive side.. fadish even. 3-4 comes in prominance.. then the 4-3... every now in then someone brings something to the table.. 46 for instance. People study it, rip some parts from it.. then incorporate it into the other base packages.

The offenses to a point do the same thing.. the spread that is all the rage.. go back and look at the run and shoot offenses. The pistol is about the only "new" evolving formation.. heck even the Packers ran the inverted wishbone some this year.. old school. RGIII is running a modified option offense for example.

The rules however are allowing some evolution to a degree if the route tree and the percentage of pass verses run.. but even that is a pattern. IE.. the fact that the Packers were forced to take defenses out of the two deep with runs and screens.. plays of that nature.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
9 Pages«<56789>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : thank ya
macbob (23h) : HAPPY BIRTHDAY, KEVIN (yesterday...sigh...)
Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Sam Shields has already been ruled out for Sunday's game.
Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : For Lions, Ansah is out. LBs Levy and Williams doubtful and Van Noy questionable. TE Ebron and DE Taylor questionable, too.
Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Jimmy G sprained his AC joint
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Brady is suspended and 2nd stringer Jimmy Garoppolo suffered a ACL sprain in week 2
Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Patriots 3rd stringer QB Jacoby Brissett injuried and needs surgery
Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Quinten Rollins is the only NFL cornerback to play 20 or more snaps in the slot this year without allowing a catch
Porforis (23-Sep) : Cutler has better luck completing to Packers players 10+ yards downfield than Rodgers does. I say only mostly facetiously.
Smokey (23-Sep) : HELLO DAVE
The_Green_Ninja (23-Sep) : You people would think we have a QB worse than Cutler.
dyeah_gb (22-Sep) : Bench him!!!!
Porforis (22-Sep) : WE'RE TEARING EACHOTHER APART! CAN'T YOU SEE WHAT THEY'RE DOING? THIS IS JUST WHAT THE BEARS WANT!
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : you
The_Green_Ninja (22-Sep) : **** you ****s who are losing faith in our MVP qb. Go Aaron and Go Pack Go
Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : “I know I’ve got to play better, and I will,” Rodgers said, via ESPN.com.
Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : Nearing the end of the line for Adrian?
Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : Adrian Peterson to miss time with meniscus injury
Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : is that a good thign?
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Wheel routes galore!
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : 40 yard dash time: 4.37 seconds
Mucky Tundra (20-Sep) : that's interesting?
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Packers are having veteran RB C.J. Spiller in for a visit today, source said.
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Sure as hell hope Aaron Rodgers lights things up now.
Mucky Tundra (20-Sep) : damned if i know
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : I bet if I cache'd it, we'd have no issues at all.
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : I wonder how load intensive it would be if I added an auto refresh to this fan shout? Maybe refresh every 30 seconds...
Mucky Tundra (20-Sep) : *sad panda*
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Sucky Tundra
Mucky Tundra (20-Sep) : Goddamnit why did I pick the bears to win?
Packerchick (20-Sep) : bummer of a game the other night, but we will pick ourselves up and move on
Packerchick (20-Sep) : been gone too long havent I?
Smokey (20-Sep) : they improve .
Smokey (20-Sep) : Answer: The WRs/TEs are not getting open quick enough for #12 to pass the ball and he has to scramble for his life. This too will change as
Porforis (19-Sep) : "Why haven't the Packers been able to move the ball as consistently through the air as on the ground?"
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl LI
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 12:00 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / nyrpack

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

21-Sep / Around The NFL / Smokey

21-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

21-Sep / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey


Packers Headlines