Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
11 Pages<12345>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#21 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 7:58:30 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Like MN, the running game is important to SF. Not so much to GB other than to keep the other teams from sacking Aaron Rodgers every other down.


That checkdown to Dujaun Harris has been a thing of beauty. I'm not so worried about their Defense with a one armed Justin Smith, cause Aldon Smith is a one trick pony without him. Their defense as a whole is hard hitting, so our boys just have to man up. I really don't think we are as soft as we were in game 1, so anybody thinking San Francisco is going to man handle us again is in for a rude awakening.
Offline warhawk  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:45:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 2
Applause Received: 290
Just some general observations.

When it's 2nd round playoff time teams are usually pretty even. Look to the better QB to be the difference.

The 49'r pass rush is always sited yet the Packers have 9 more sacks and that was with CM3 out a month.

The lack of a balanced offense is often sited as a shortcoming for the Packers yet they are one of only four teams that average over 250 ypg passing and 100 ypg rushing. Two of the other three are NE and Denver. The tops seeds over in the AFC.

Finally, the Packers have now seen what the 49r's will do defensively over and over and you can see how McCarthy has adapted with Harris and the offense. The offense is now comfortable with what they have to do to be more effective when the defense has taken away the big play opportunites.

That and the fact we had four or five players in their first pro game in there defensively at any one time that first go around and what was Bush doing in there anyhow?. They are much more ready for this now.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 1/8/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#23 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:16:56 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,494
Applause Received: 4,030
2010 Packers faced their week 1 opponent in the playoffs, the Eagles.

2010 Eagles, Falcons, Bears. Packers played each during the season.
2012 Vikings, 49ers and possibly Seahawks.


Irrelevant observation, yes.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Packers_Finland on 1/8/2013(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:22:00 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 460
Applause Received: 496
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
2010 Packers faced their week 1 opponent in the playoffs, the Eagles.

2010 Eagles, Falcons, Bears. Packers played each during the season.
2012 Vikings, 49ers and possibly Seahawks.



Irrelevant observation, yes.


care to explain the significance of said irrelevant observation? I don't get it :-k
Offline Packers_Finland  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:26:34 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 88
Applause Received: 45
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
2010 Packers faced their week 1 opponent in the playoffs, the Eagles.

2010 Eagles, Falcons, Bears. Packers played each during the season.
2012 Vikings, 49ers and possibly Seahawks.


Irrelevant observation, yes.


I'm not a superstitious man but I do like this train of thought.
Offline earthquake  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:28:36 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 520
Applause Received: 170
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
care to explain the significance of said irrelevant observation? I don't get it :-k


In 2010 the Packers faced each of their (NFC) playoff opponents earlier in the regular season.

If the Packers and Seahawks win this weekend, they will do the same once again.
Offline gbguy20  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:30:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 460
Applause Received: 496
In that case, we would have lost to all 3 of our playoff opponents earlier in the regular season, not sure if like.
Offline warhawk  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:34:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 2
Applause Received: 290
I was thinking of this myself about how nice it would be to take down the 49'rs and could hardly wait if it works out we get Seattle at our place.

That's justice and clearly shows whose best when it counts the most.

I so hope we put the 49r's away and the Seahawks beat Atlanta. I'm sure the Packers players want that more than you or me.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
earthquake on 1/8/2013(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:40:19 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 460
Applause Received: 496
Twitter lead me to this article on a 49ers blog:

Quote:
Cosell: “I don’t think Aaron Rodgers is playing particularly great football.”
Posted on January 8, 2013 by Grant Cohn

Greg Cosell spoke on KNBR Monday afternoon. Here’s what he said about Aaron Rodgers.

Q: How good is Aaron Rodgers, and can the 49ers contain him?

COSELL: I’m not saying this to be bold or controversial, but I don’t think Aaron Rodgers is playing particularly great football. I think he’s so physically gifted – he can throw it on the run better than anyone in this league – but he’s leaving an awful lot of plays on the field.

I think he’s indecisive and tentative in the pocket. He’s not pulling the trigger on throws that are there. I think this has been an ongoing thing all throughout the season.

Some people would say I’m nitpicking because of his numbers, but he’s so physically gifted that there are times that he still makes plays. The biggest concern with Aaron Rodgers and their pass offense right now is not the rhythmic flow of it, it’s the extension of plays. That’s where he’s at his best right now.

I would bet that the Packers will have to do some chipping with Jermichael Finley, with back, because their right tackle, Don Barclay, and quite frankly their left tackle, Marshall Newhouse, I don’t think they’re going to be able to block Ahmad Brooks or Aldon Smith.

Q: Why do you think Rodgers is leaving a lot of plays on the field?

COSELL: Sometimes he’ll leave plays on the field, move and make another play. Sometimes he’ll leave plays on the field, move and get sacked. His first two sacks this week were on him. He didn’t pull the trigger to open receivers and then he couldn’t get away. The defense then beat him. There’s been stretches of this season where he’s been like this. But he’s so physically gifted where he’ll make throws and you’ll go, “Wow, not many people make that throw.”

Q: It seems like their offense is not fazed when their in third and eight, third and 12.

COSELL: And that’s what you have to be concerned about. The burden Rodgers puts on your defense is this: No defense is built to cover, whether it’s zone or man, for four, five or six seconds. No defense it built to do that. And Rodgers, with his ability to extend plays – not only extend them, but then make throws at the intermediate and deeper levels, which is something not a lot of quarterbacks can do – that’s the burden he puts on your defense.


- greg cosell

Sure seems to be exactly what we have been discussing all season, here. Week 1 vs the niners was a perfect example of exactly what he is talking about. Watching film of that game rodgers took sacks instead of throwing it into the holes left by blitzing linebackers, missed out on at least 1 easy touchdown because of it. Let's hope it doesn't cost us the game this time.


edit: I hate the fact that this post is negative and I wasn't able to save it. Someone help me.

edit2: I'll turn it positive by stealing someone else's tweet:

Quote:
Melinda B ‏@ilovemypackers

Oh shit.. all these quakes in Northern and Central CA right now.. think the Niners are watching Packers film? #Scared #QuiveringInTheirShoes
Offline earthquake  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11:42:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 520
Applause Received: 170
warhawk said: Go to Quoted Post
I was thinking of this myself about how nice it would be to take down the 49'rs and could hardly wait if it works out we get Seattle at our place.

That's justice and clearly shows whose best when it counts the most.

I so hope we put the 49r's away and the Seahawks beat Atlanta. I'm sure the Packers players want that more than you or me.


Yeah this is how I feel too, though I wouldn't be too worried about GB having to travel to the dome in Hotlanta where they absolutely own the Falcons.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
11 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : Zeke Elliott tired of domestic violence investigation. NFL moving forward now.
Smokey (6h) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (6h) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (6h) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (7h) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (7h) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (10h) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (10h) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (10h) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (10h) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (10h) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (11h) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (12h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (13h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (15h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (20h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (21h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (22h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (22h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (23h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (23h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (23h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

10h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines