Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
6 Pages«<23456>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#31 Posted : Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:32:48 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Pickett has another year on his contract unless I missed something in the last couple days.

High cap number.. but still signed. Are you stating he should be reworked at a lower number?


I thought Pickett was up this year.
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#32 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 9:00:32 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 202
Applause Received: 271
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
While I am not proposing a swith to 4-3. Matthews would not be wasted as a 4-3 LBer. He could make an outstanding MLB in a 4-3. He would be like Urlacher. His pass rush ability would allow him to keep blockers off him in run support, he has the coverage skills and his speed would work good covering sideline to sideline.


He wouldn't be wasted, but not outstanding. Less utilized in his area of excellence.

It would be like Detroit moving Calvin Johnson to safety. Yes, he might be productive there. But why would you do that?
Offline Wade  
#33 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 10:22:57 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
He wouldn't be wasted, but not outstanding. Less utilized in his area of excellence.

It would be like Detroit moving Calvin Johnson to safety. Yes, he might be productive there. But why would you do that?


Because you're the Lions?

[grin1]

thanks Post received 1 applause.
QCHuskerFan on 1/18/2013(UTC)
Offline doddpower  
#34 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 10:55:13 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,422
Applause Received: 948
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
He wouldn't be wasted, but not outstanding. Less utilized in his area of excellence.

It would be like Detroit moving Calvin Johnson to safety. Yes, he might be productive there. But why would you do that?


LOL, it's not even close to being that extreme of a change. CM3 would still be rushing the passer on passing downs exactly as he has been doing since he entered the league, and likely still playing defensive end on some variations of base packages, as well. He would just be utilized in different roles in a creative 4-3 hybrid scheme; sometimes a MLB, sometimes an OLB for a play or two, etc. Make no mistake about it, he would still be the teams best pass rusher, and no defense coordinator worthy of the title would not allow him to rush the passer most of the time.

I agree with the overall premise though that CM3 is ultimately likely best suited for a 3-4 OLB, but I don't think there would be that big of a difference in a 4-3 with the right coach. It's still a completely different scenario than moving Kampman to OLB. Clay already drops into coverage and spies often as it is, and he can rush the QB and play in space at an elite level. Not to mention, it can be argued that almost every other defensive player is either better suited for a hybrid 4-3 style of defense or, at the very least, as suited as they are for a 3-4. The net effect of that could easily be better defensive play around the board.

It doesn't matter though, as this discussion is just an interesting thought experiment. The Packers are sticking with a 3-4 under Dom Capers. I'm fine with that, but I think giving Ray Horton a shot at defensive coordinator would be a "risk" well worth taking.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#35 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 12:12:14 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,058
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
He wouldn't be wasted, but not outstanding. Less utilized in his area of excellence.

It would be like Detroit moving Calvin Johnson to safety. Yes, he might be productive there. But why would you do that?


What? How the heck do you compare moving a WR to S equally as moving a 3 - 4 OLB to a 4 - 3 DE? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Those are vastly different sets of skills between the two, one striking difference is the requirement to go from breaking tackles to actually making tackles.




Why couldn't Clay Matthews play OLB in a 4 - 3? Why would he have to be switched to a DE? My high level understanding would be he'd benefit from having another guy on the DL which would allow him to unleash on the QB.
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#36 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 1:37:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 202
Applause Received: 271
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
What? How the heck do you compare moving a WR to S equally as moving a 3 - 4 OLB to a 4 - 3 DE? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Those are vastly different sets of skills between the two, one striking difference is the requirement to go from breaking tackles to actually making tackles.




Why couldn't Clay Matthews play OLB in a 4 - 3? Why would he have to be switched to a DE? My high level understanding would be he'd benefit from having another guy on the DL which would allow him to unleash on the QB.


The point is that every team we face would be elated if we made Matthews into a 4-3 LB. Because it would limit his pass rushing. Much like making Johnson a safety would excite every team because it would be taking him away from catching touchdowns.

Let's try again. Does Minny make a habit of splitting AP out wide? No. Why? Well, if he is split out wide, it removes the threat of him running the ball. If the defense doesn't have to defend the run with AP, is their life better? Yes. So by continually splitting him out wide, Minny would help the other team. Lining CM3 up as an outside backer in a 4-3 would be removing him from the role he performs best. Yes, I know he can still blitz. But he would not be rushing the QB as much as he does in a 3-4. It's not possible.

Let's look at the 4-3 for a second. A 4-3 is designed to pressure the QB with the DL. So don't tell me he can still rush the QB a lot, because the defense is designed to not need that. When you blitz in a 4-3 you either rush 5 and depend on 6 to cover which is a risk, or you drop a 290lb lineman into coverage, again, not ideal.

Let's not even think about CM3 as a middle backer. That's just wrong.
Offline Rockmolder  
#37 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 1:49:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 384
Didn't seem to stop Von Miller a whole lot in his first year with the Broncos.

You can use a LB in a pass rushing role very effectively in a 4-3, as well. It's not like he's always coming on the rush in the 3-4. Maybe the drop back percentage would be a bit higher, but not that crazy.

Don't know why we're having this discusson, though. If there's one thing that doesn't work, it's switching schemes every four years. Don't know why it'd be necessary to go to the 4-3, all of a sudden. Especially since everyone was jumping out of joy when we fired Sanders and went to the 3-4 with Capers.
Offline doddpower  
#38 Posted : Friday, January 18, 2013 2:12:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,422
Applause Received: 948
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
Didn't seem to stop Von Miller a whole lot in his first year with the Broncos.

You can use a LB in a pass rushing role very effectively in a 4-3, as well. It's not like he's always coming on the rush in the 3-4. Maybe the drop back percentage would be a bit higher, but not that crazy.

Don't know why we're having this discusson, though. If there's one thing that doesn't work, it's switching schemes every four years. Don't know why it'd be necessary to go to the 4-3, all of a sudden. Especially since everyone was jumping out of joy when we fired Sanders and went to the 3-4 with Capers.


As I said earlier, it's just an interesting thought experiment, especially considering how many Packers defensive players currently on the roster seem to be much better suited for a 4-3.

Re: the previous discussion, CM3 would be rushing from a DE/OLB position on obvious passing downs, regardless of whether he was standing or had a hand in the dirt in a 3-4 or 4-3 scheme. The only difference would be is that he would play more of a "rover" role, almost like Charles Woodson has done in the past on 1st and 2nd downs in a 4-3, depending on the situation. And at times, I'm sure he would still line up as a DE in base packages, as well. I wouldn't view that as much of a problem at all, and very well could be a good thing. He already does similar things now, especially against mobile QBs when spying. I'm not sure why some think it would limit his pass rushing opportunities at all, at least with a good coordinator. But as has been said, it's nothing more than something interesting to talk about in a long season, because it's not happening. Hopefully several of these other more prototypical 4-3 can make a better transition to a 3-4 defense next season though. Or better yet, we get more appropriate 3-4 personnel, especially DL and LBs.

Offline dhazer  
#39 Posted : Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:40:17 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2016Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 100
Applause Received: 338
All this talk about switching to a 4-3 and wasting CM3's talents is actually funny. You people do realize he was a DE in college right? Thats what he was drafted as and he had to learn the 3-4 scheme. I know we won't switch cuz we are in the same type of years we were in with Favre. You know the ones where we get to the playoffs but then get knocked out.
Offline Rockmolder  
#40 Posted : Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:52:25 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 384
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
All this talk about switching to a 4-3 and wasting CM3's talents is actually funny. You people do realize he was a DE in college right? Thats what he was drafted as and he had to learn the 3-4 scheme. I know we won't switch cuz we are in the same type of years we were in with Favre. You know the ones where we get to the playoffs but then get knocked out.


He wasn't, actually. He played the elephant position at USC. Pretty much as stand-up hybrid DE/LB. Very similar what he plays here in Green Bay.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 1/20/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<23456>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (1h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (1h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (1h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (1h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (1h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (1h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (1h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (1h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (1h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (1h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (1h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (1h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (1h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
uffda udfa (1h) : Mike Pereira explained on Twitter what he should've on FOX.
Smokey (1h) : Keeping them thread separated is the key. Fan Shout is for any and all members to post as they please. No one voted you King U2 .
uffda udfa (1h) : This is for NFL stuff. Not crock pots or crack pots.
uffda udfa (1h) : Shout is not back alley. Not your forum either.
Smokey (1h) : Cooking, or travel, or our favorite movie have every right in this forum.
Smokey (2h) : It is not, YOUR FORUM . Even politics is tolerated in the Back Ally .
uffda udfa (2h) : I love cooking but this is a Packers forum not Iron Chef.
Smokey (2h) : Anyone, man or woman, that can cook does not need to always depend upon others to cook their food for them.
Smokey (2h) : The greater majority of successful restaurants are owned/and run by Men.
Smokey (2h) : Making fun of the art of cooking only demonstrates a lack of sophistication.
Smokey (2h) : Most of the finest chefs in the world are men.
hardrocker950 (3h) : lol
uffda udfa (4h) : Best pressure cooker talk on the net!
hardrocker950 (5h) : Time to get the CB situation sorted out
Smokey (5h) : DON'T DELAY, JOIN TODAY !
musccy (7h) : Sorry, but no to shields. 9 mil better spent elsewhere.
uffda udfa (7h) : Sam Shields still having headaches but wants to continue playing.
uffda udfa (8h) : Not harsh. Another failure and playoff embarrassment.
uffda udfa (8h) : Aaron cried a little when asked about Jordy playing today.
GoPack1984 (8h) : Dismal season? I think that's too harsh.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

2h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Announcements / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson


Packers Headlines