Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Pack93z  
#1 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 2:14:57 PM(UTC)
Forgive me.. but it is the offseason and may lead into a decent discussion.

Titus Young was waived and can be claimed along with a reasonable salary. Would you take a complete flyer on a talented yet seemingly immature player?

Personally, I might put in a claim just to bring him in and have a conversation to see if there is any value in keeping him around. Maybe, just maybe a change of scenery and being able to face the Lions a couple times a year might produce results.

Reasons to do it:

1. Potentially losing Jennings and having lost Driver (depth) already, it gives us another option for the offseason at least.

2. Adds another talented player without spending big or using a draft pick upon.

3. Gives the Packers flexibility in the draft for other positions and UDFA.

The risk is very minimal for offseason workouts to see if there is any possibility it might reap rewards.

Over/Under 6 posts before Packer People is uttered.
QCHuskerFan  
#2 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 2:43:53 PM(UTC)
I am of 2 minds about this. Part of me tries to be in tune with player attitudes and lockerroom. Young is a disaster historically. He allegedly punched a teammate and was bad enough that even the Lions couldn't put up with his attitude. That is saying something.

But then, you're right. Doesn't cost much to try him out, I think. Sign him, evaluate during OTA's and cut him at the slightest sign of drama.

He is not the type of player I care for, but if he could score TD's, maybe I'm looking at it wrong.
nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 3:02:38 PM(UTC)
Don't see much downside.

Packers have been successful with reclamation projects in the past. Woody was once considered a malcontent. Team leader now.
Porforis  
#4 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 3:54:19 PM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
I am of 2 minds about this. Part of me tries to be in tune with player attitudes and lockerroom. Young is a disaster historically. He allegedly punched a teammate and was bad enough that even the Lions couldn't put up with his attitude. That is saying something.

But then, you're right. Doesn't cost much to try him out, I think. Sign him, evaluate during OTA's and cut him at the slightest sign of drama.

He is not the type of player I care for, but if he could score TD's, maybe I'm looking at it wrong.


That. Even if Finley and Jennings leave, he's going to be very low on the totem pole, some humility and limited snaps would do him some good. And if he still doesn't get the point that he's simply one man on a 52 man roster (if he makes it that far), adios.

As far as the Lions not being able to put up with his attitude, that team and that coach is hardly the type of environment that will help someone mature.
Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 4:23:59 PM(UTC)
I don't see how bringing him in, plus taking over his salary benefits the Packers more than it could potentially be damaging. One of the reason the Packers WR group is so good is because they are unselfish, something Titus Young is not. He complains when Calvin Johnson receives more targets... how's he gonna do with Cobb, Nelson, Jones and Finley getting more targets?

No. Deal. No. Claim.

If he clears waivers and they can sign him at a friendly salary, maybe.
Yerko  
#6 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 4:25:27 PM(UTC)
Dude seems like a complete loser and I don't know what his problem is. I'd love to make a joke and say its all Schwartz's fault but I can't. His main gripe was the Lions weren't including him in future plans? If I am not mistaken he was behind the best wide receiver in the league on the depth chart. What more can a team possibly do?

For once, I'd say pass.
RajiRoar  
#7 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2013 5:39:46 PM(UTC)
No.

I dont mind a mild headcase OFF the field... but when a player is F*cking the team ON the field, he has issues.
Mike McCarthy would not stand for that shit for one second.
musccy  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:01:46 AM(UTC)
He purposefully lined up out of position to spite the Lions vs. the Packers. His H.S. coach just revealed that Titus is convinced he's better than Megatron. Unless he's getting #1 playing time and receptions, he's going to be a total P.I.T.A.

It'd be like Finley's drama on crack and steroids. No thanks.
nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:06:48 AM(UTC)
musccy said: Go to Quoted Post
He purposefully lined up out of position to spite the Lions vs. the Packers. His H.S. coach just revealed that Titus is convinced he's better than Megatron. Unless he's getting #1 playing time and receptions, he's going to be a total P.I.T.A.

It'd be like Finley's drama on crack and steroids. No thanks.


Give him Favre's number.
PackerTraxx  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 1:21:17 PM(UTC)
musccy said: Go to Quoted Post
He purposefully lined up out of position to spite the Lions vs. the Packers. His H.S. coach just revealed that Titus is convinced he's better than Megatron. Unless he's getting #1 playing time and receptions, he's going to be a total P.I.T.A.

It'd be like Finley's drama on crack and steroids. No thanks.


This. No way, especially coupled with his other sh_t.
steveishere  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:43:50 PM(UTC)
Not to mention this is a guy with NFL talent that got basically kicked off his college team his last year because of his attitude. He obviously didn't learn anything from then until now. The offense Mike McCarthy runs depends on players being unselfish and being able to play all over the field and share targets. This guy simply wouldn't be able to handle it.
dhazer  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:44:00 PM(UTC)
thread ended he was claimed by Rams
gbguy20  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 8:58:42 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
thread ended he was claimed by Rams


the rams were also the only team who put a claim in on him.
Since69  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 7:36:06 AM(UTC)
I'm glad they took him. I didn't want him for the Packers, but what I really didn't want was to see him go to New England. Belichick would have turned him into a All-Pro...
Wade  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 2:33:04 PM(UTC)
No.

and

Hell, no!

This is not Andre Rison, who had shown himself capable of being a top reciever.
This is not Terrell Owens, who though he was a major headcase, always gave full effort.
This is not even Randy Moss, who, though he undoubtedly "took plays off", never intentionally lined up in the wrong position out of petulance.

I wouldn't sign Young if I thought he had the skills of Rison in his prime AND Owens in his AND Moss in his.

If he gives me, say, four years of post-Lions, commitment and putting-the-team-first and keeping-his-spoiled-brat-mouth-shut, then -- maybe -- I'd give him a shot as a free agent.

But before then? I'd sign any of the above three, with their current skill set, first.

(And I wouldn't touch any of them with a ten-foot pole.)


wpr  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 2:46:32 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
No.

and

Hell, no!

This is not Andre Rison, who had shown himself capable of being a top reciever.
This is not Terrell Owens, who though he was a major headcase, always gave full effort.
This is not even Randy Moss, who, though he undoubtedly "took plays off", never intentionally lined up in the wrong position out of petulance.

I wouldn't sign Young if I thought he had the skills of Rison in his prime AND Owens in his AND Moss in his.

If he gives me, say, four years of post-Lions, commitment and putting-the-team-first and keeping-his-spoiled-brat-mouth-shut, then -- maybe -- I'd give him a shot as a free agent.

But before then? I'd sign any of the above three, with their current skill set, first.

(And I wouldn't touch any of them with a ten-foot pole.)





Does it seem like there is a disproportionate amount of egocentric WR in the NFL compared to the other positions? We could have a who's who (I hate to use all star) of maniacal WRs of the past 20 years. Most were not all the good in the long run.

even when there was a greater emphasis on the running game there did not seem to be as many nut jobs. Perhaps because teams so often use 3 wr and at the most they only used 2 rb so the pool is larger.
Wade  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 6:40:07 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Does it seem like there is a disproportionate amount of egocentric WR in the NFL compared to the other positions? We could have a who's who (I hate to use all star) of maniacal WRs of the past 20 years. Most were not all the good in the long run.

even when there was a greater emphasis on the running game there did not seem to be as many nut jobs. Perhaps because teams so often use 3 wr and at the most they only used 2 rb so the pool is larger.


IMO, that is part of what made Donald Driver such a wonderful story. He went against type. Even in his years where he was arguably among the best at his position, he didn't go diva. Even his Dancing with the Stars gig didn't go the direction your typical WR star would take it.



Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (18m) : MM said those that aren't practicing today (I believe Bulaga/House) probably aren't gonna play against the Bears.
beast (19m) : Panky too... who is listed as a G/T, but I think he was 3rd string LT in the preseason
uffda udfa (23m) : Bakh is back at practice and is in line to play. Bulaga and John the only other T's. McCray?
Mucky Tundra (28m) : So uh, do we actually have any OTs left? Like, real ones and not practice squad fodder?
Zero2Cool (2h) : Vince Lombardi, on protesters, from 1970: ‘They have a right to say what they want, and it behooves us to listen.’
uffda udfa (2h) : Kyle Murphy to IR for Ulrick John
Zero2Cool (6h) : Bass Pro's $4 billion acquisition of Cabela's is complete, but it leaves a small western Nebraska town in suspense:
Zero2Cool (7h) : "Aaron Rodgers is keeping Mike McCarthy employed the same way AJ Green keeps Andy Dalton employed.” - @LeBatardShow
Zero2Cool (8h) : King, Kendricks and Bennett.
gbguy20 (9h) : which packers sat during the anthem?
Porforis (19h) : Noooo, not Goode!
Zero2Cool (23h) : The #Packers place Brett Goode on IR and re-sign LS Taybor Pepper
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers signing Ulrick John to active roster off Cardinals practice squad today, according to a source
Porforis (23h) : Agreed. HOW ABOUT THEM PACKERS?!
greengold (23h) : i.e. keep politics out of football!
greengold (23h) : Let the players who want to honor the flag along with the vast majority of fans do so. Don't celebrate those who don't.
greengold (23h) : Rule, practice, suggestion? Whatever supposedly changed in 2009. Go back to the way it was. Let the players who want to honor the flag an
Zero2Cool (23h) : Roethlisberger regrets Steelers' decision to skip anthem
Zero2Cool (23h) : Chmura: "#Packers by 10-14. The Bears already played their good game. I have absolutely no fear for Thursday's game."
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : The NFL Rulebook does not mention the anthem.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : There is no rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : The NFL needs to enforce the rule or get rid of the rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : Players stood for the National Anthem long before 2009. There just was no *rule* requiring them to stand.
steveishere (25-Sep) : How many fans are in the restroom taking a dump or in line for nachos during anthem. Same people probably mad at players
Porforis (25-Sep) : Yup.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : You know why
Porforis (25-Sep) : NFL players weren't even on the field for the anthem until 2009 - Why all of a sudden is not participating such a big deal?
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Former Seahawks/Packers HC Mike Holmgren on President Trump: “He’s uninformed”.
steveishere (25-Sep) : Funny how you were apparently fine with seeing guys who abuse women or do/sell drugs out there but god forbid they kneel lol
steveishere (25-Sep) : you had 1 foot out the door since Favre left anyways... bye
dhazer (25-Sep) : well so much for watching Packer games, I saw the 3 sitting on the bench and i turned the channel to the race, No more NFL games for me
beast (25-Sep) : Who are the longshots? Jags? Saints? Redskins? and who?
SINCITYCHEEZE (25-Sep) : Buckeye closing in on 4 Longshots in Pickem today....Son you need to hook me up we could make a killing on some parlays next weekend. Lol
beast (25-Sep) : Bears ran it 60% of the time...
beast (24-Sep) : Bears tried hard to give it away, but Steelers couldn't take it
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

59m / Around The NFL / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Around The NFL / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines