Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 8:49:47 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,050
What are your feelings on the Packers keeping Jermichael Finley? Over the last two seasons, he has 116 receptions for 1,434 yards and 10 touchdowns. He is schedule to make $4.45 million this season, with a bonus of $3.5 million due in March.

I think I'd rather he restructure a long deal that puts him around the $4-5 million per year range. Long range as in 3 or 4 year deal with incentives.
Offline nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:00:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,420
Let's see how Quarless is coming along.
Offline wpr  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:05:09 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,994
Applause Received: 2,043
If he is willing to restructure I say they can't loose. I can not imagine he or his agent are willing to swallow their pride and take the pay cut. I am sure they think there is 10 teams out there just begging JerMike to come and play for them for a ton-o-dough.
Offline RajiRoar  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 1:23:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 50
Applause Received: 370
Jennings is gone.

let's not muck up our passing game more than it already is.

we have nobody to replace him *yet*
Offline Yerko  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 3:16:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 212
Applause Received: 381
With the way Jermichael Finley has been talking about wanting to be a Packer for life, why not take the chance and try to restructure for a little less money?

With the departure of Jennings about to happen, it makes Jermichael Finley 1000x more important to this offense.
Offline porky88  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:23:02 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2016Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 253
Applause Received: 511
Finley had a nice final month of the season, so I understand arguments from both sides.

Nevertheless, I think it's time to phase out the last four years in favor of James Jones, Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, and an improving running game. Finley is an underachiever. It is what it is. I wish he'd fulfill his potential, but the Packers have other priorities. It starts with locking up Clay Matthews and B.J. Raji. I’d also rather hang onto Charles Woodson, who I think is more important to the defense (not to mention locker room) than Finley is right now.
Offline JustJeff  
#7 Posted : Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:29:52 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 2/5/2013(UTC)
Location: Backin' the Pack
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 16
If Jermichael Finley were a true TE, I would try to keep him.

I love the idea of a long term deal around $5 million. It's not going to happen. I think Finley and his verbose agent view $6.5 million as the floor. I would be fine with that... if Jermichael Finley were a true TE.

The problem as I see it, is Finley is not a good receiving TE when he is lined up inline. He's not a good blocker regardless of where you start him. (Add those last two together and you have a TE who is ineffective as an inline TE) What you have, is an over-sized WR. I just don't see the value in paying the money it will take to keep him for what he really brings to the table. If he could play inline, then you keep him at top TE money. Maybe - over time - Finley becomes an inline TE, but it's hard to ignore his past attitude about it.

Here is what he said in 2011,
“I’m thinner right now. Green Bay probably not like me right now but I’m trying to stand up this year. I’m not going to sugarcoat it. I think a two-point, I can get on the linebacker quicker, I can get on the safety quicker and it’s a win-win for me and 12 .”
“Standing up, I think that’s the best position for me,” he said.

Asked if the coaches are comfortable with that, Finley replied, “They’re going to be comfortable with it.”
“We’ve got tons of guys (who can block), to tell you the truth and we drafted two of them. We drafted two tight ends this year.”

And then of course, there was this...
“The next step is take my game to the next level. Detail everything, and just play my ball. I feel like I’ve been playing like a robot lately. I just need to get out there and freestyle it.”

I just can't see the guy becoming a real inline TE.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 2/7/2013(UTC)
Offline Jlapp  
#8 Posted : Thursday, February 7, 2013 12:55:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 1/17/2013(UTC)
Location: IA
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 1
JustJeff said: Go to Quoted Post
If Jermichael Finley were a true TE, I would try to keep him.

I love the idea of a long term deal around $5 million. It's not going to happen. I think Finley and his verbose agent view $6.5 million as the floor. I would be fine with that... if Jermichael Finley were a true TE.


Agreed. He is a decent player but way overpaid this year for his current contract. He is a $5m/year player but I don't see many players are going to take that kind of pay cut.

His contract gives packers an out. Cut him, let someone else over pay him.
Offline JustJeff  
#9 Posted : Friday, February 8, 2013 8:28:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 2/5/2013(UTC)
Location: Backin' the Pack
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 16
JSOnline has a story titled... Jermichael Finley sees it as "50/50" whether he'll stay with Packers As a side note: The title is an unfair one, considering the context of the article (not that anyone at the Journal Sentinel would try to sensationalize it).

Here is the crux of the conundrum...

Quote:
Count this as one of general manager Ted Thompson's most difficult decisions this spring. By releasing or trading Finley, the Packers save $8.25 million. He's due a $3 million bonus in March. Yet this is also a young, athletic, physical specimen that's rare for the position. If the Packers let the 25-year-old walk - without a proven replacement in house - they might regret it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 2/8/2013(UTC)
Offline Packfan87  
#10 Posted : Friday, February 8, 2013 8:53:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Rookie

United States
Joined: 8/18/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 5
I hope they keep him. I think his arrow's starting to point up for the first time since his injury.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (26m) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (29m) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (31m) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (31m) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (32m) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (36m) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (3h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (4h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (7h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (7h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (8h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (10h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (11h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (11h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (11h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (11h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (15h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (15h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (15h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (16h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (16h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (16h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (17h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (17h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (17h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (17h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (17h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (20h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (21h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (23h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines