Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, January 29, 2013 4:24:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,052
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
Also, this article only compares the Packers O-linemen, than draws the conclusion that they need new guys because some did worse than others. John Madden and I would be willing to go out on a limb (a fairly stout one though) and say that that is true of most any football team ever/anywhere. In short, it doesn't mean much if it isn't comparing them to other linemen in the league. Not to say the conclusion is wrong (because it may very well be correct), just that the method of reaching it isn't.


some of problems with amateur columnists. They don't typically have all the resources they need to substantiate their claims. Nor are they always as articulate as we would like them to be.

I usually pass up posting these kinds of articles but since we have been discussing the OL and draft needs I thought I would toss this one onto the pile.
Offline porky88  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:39:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2016Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 253
Applause Received: 511
This seems to place only an emphasis on pass protection and penalties. What about run blocking? Being a good pass protector does not equate to run blocking. The two aren't mutually exclusive. For example, Jeff Saturday was a bad run blocker this year. He couldn't get to the next level because he didn't move well. That's among the reasons they made the move to EDS. These figures paint a much brighter picture of Saturday.

There's no doubt Green Bay needs to improve the talent on the offensive line, but based on history, they have three starters that are competent or capable of playing at a high level. Those are T.J. Lang, Josh Sitton, and Bryan Bulaga. The latter was rock solid in 2011, and better than advertised this season with the exception of the Seattle game. That game leads to an inflated 16-game projection. Takeaway that game and Bulaga has a reasonable projection for a right tackle.

Identify the weakness and correct it. The weak link is center and especially left tackle. Many grade Newhouse on a curve for reasons that confuse me. In this offense, though, left tackle is the second most important position. That problem needs to be rectified.
Offline Dulak  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:32:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 300
Applause Received: 154
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
The first thing that comes to my mind is that the numbers are skewed because the sacks usually come from the edge not the center of the line. So, as an example, Barclay with 14 may have actually done much better than Lang with 12. Without knowing who they're actually assigned to block it's impossible to tell.


ya I thought the same thing - most prime time rushers are those on the outside; really good DEs or OLBs - and those guys are all taking on a tackle (usually). Not that I dont think our Oline needs a look at.

Also as some has suggested we (rodgers) needs more practice at the quick drop off and not holding the ball too long ...

and maybe a better RB might help keep the teams off him a bit. Someone bigger that can block and can also run.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 2/2/2013(UTC)
Offline olds70supreme  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:36:47 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 24
Applause Received: 61
Quote:
some of problems with amateur columnists. They don't typically have all the resources they need to substantiate their claims. Nor are they always as articulate as we would like them to be.

I usually pass up posting these kinds of articles but since we have been discussing the OL and draft needs I thought I would toss this one onto the pile.


Yeah, who am I kidding? I'll read anything and everything remotely Packer related from the end of the season until the start of the next.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 1/30/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#15 Posted : Saturday, February 2, 2013 11:00:40 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
We're stacked at the position imo.

LT: Sherrod, Datko
LG: Lang, Barclay, Van Roten, EDS
C: Player to be acquired, Lang, EDS
RG: Sitton, Barclay. Van Roten, EDS
LT: Bulaga, Newhouse
Offline wpr  
#16 Posted : Saturday, February 2, 2013 11:22:27 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,052
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We're stacked at the position imo.

LT: Sherrod, Newhouse, Datko- PS
LG: Lang, Barclay, EDS, Van Roten-PS
C: EDS, Player to be drafted, Lang
RG: Sitton, Barclay, EDS, Van Roten-PS
RT: Bulaga, Barclay, Newhouse


pretty close. I fixed it for you. Including having only one side listed as "LT" [grin1]
Offline Wade  
#17 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 10:06:16 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We're stacked at the position imo.

LT: Sherrod, Datko
LG: Lang, Barclay, Van Roten, EDS
C: Player to be acquired, Lang, EDS
RG: Sitton, Barclay. Van Roten, EDS
LT: Bulaga, Newhouse


Say whut?

Sitton is a stud.
Beyond that...

We're still operating primarily on the "potential" theory. The same thing that led people to say we were fine with false-start-Cliffie, that Lang had the potential to play OT, that Mrs. Colledge and Mark Spitz were going to be good enough, etc.

We have one stud, and a bunch of guys that are serviceable on their good days and are young enough that may have potential to develop into more.

We're stacked only in the poker sense of being short-stacked.

And we're hoping we can still beat Brunson, Moneymaker, and Ungar.

The only reason I"m not calling "OL OL OL" in my usual way is that, unfortunately, GB also has pretty serious needs on both DL and LB, too.

Offline Wade  
#18 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 10:07:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Say whut?

Sitton is a stud.
Beyond that...

We're still operating primarily on the "potential" theory. The same thing that led people to say we were fine with false-start-Cliffie, that Lang had the potential to play OT, that Mrs. Colledge and Mark Spitz were going to be good enough, etc.

We have one stud, and a bunch of guys that are serviceable on their good days and are young enough that may have potential to develop into more.

We're stacked only in the poker sense of being short-stacked.

And we're hoping we have undeveloped stars that will be able to beat Brunson, Moneymaker, and Ungar.

The only reason I"m not calling "OL OL OL" in my usual way is that, unfortunately, GB also has pretty serious needs on both DL and LB, too.



Offline wpr  
#19 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 11:59:27 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,052
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post


quoting your self with nothing new to add is a sign of sickness. [grin1]
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 2/15/2013(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#20 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:23:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
quoting your self with nothing new to add is a sign of sickness. [grin1]


What's worse is when all he does is jazzes up what I said in another thread in the first place. [grin1] If I wanted to do creative writing, I'd make money at it, not waste it on my numbnut buddies.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (15m) : GB needs a new motto : DEFENSE RULES ! , is intended to change the direction of the Packers focus moving forward .
Smokey (17m) : Thank You Zero.
Zero2Cool (22m) : Great reading a thread and seeing "defense rules" spammed in them all. Great reading material.
Smokey (35m) : DEFENSE RULES !
Zero2Cool (1h) : Think you need to defensive leaders. Front Seven and Secondary. We seem to lack both. Daniels is closest.
beast (1h) : Packers players had a right to complain when they were being bullied by Mike Daniels... just talking about Packers ;-) jk
Zero2Cool (1h) : It was the 26th largest margin since 1940. Feels much worse
Zero2Cool (1h) : thought it was biggest margin of victory in Conf Championship, I was mistaken.
Smokey (3h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (3h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (4h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (4h) : go pack go ?
wpr (5h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (5h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (5h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (5h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (5h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (6h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (6h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (6h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (7h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (7h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (8h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (8h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (8h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (8h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (10h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (10h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (10h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (10h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (10h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (10h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (10h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

10h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

16h / Around The NFL / mojaveson


Packers Headlines