Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online yooperfan  
#1 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 2:11:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,634
Applause Received: 648
It is being reported that the NFL is considering widening the field by 35 feet.
The idea being that this would make the game safer.

Any thoughts?
Offline wpr  
#2 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 2:23:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,993
Applause Received: 2,043
I don't see it making the game any safer. Sure it is a bigger field but teams tend to play the edges. it will be more of the same.

Next it will make the sidelines less safe as there will be less room or they will have to pull seats out of the stands. THAT will never happen.
Offline Formo  
#3 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 2:23:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 159
Any changes made to the game to increase the safety of the game I will dislike, unless it means they go back to the leather helmet days.
Offline Porforis  
#4 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 3:04:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 346
Applause Received: 645
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
It is being reported that the NFL is considering widening the field by 35 feet.
The idea being that this would make the game safer.

Any thoughts?


Absolutely not. It would change the game WAY too much... Very offense-friendly in an already offense-friendly league.

Also, do you have a source?
Online yooperfan  
#5 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 3:20:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,634
Applause Received: 648
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
Absolutely not. It would change the game WAY too much... Very offense-friendly in an already offense-friendly league.

Also, do you have a source?


It's being reported on just about any website you look at.

Offline Porforis  
#6 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 3:52:12 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 346
Applause Received: 645
To be fair, this wasn't reported on either ESPN's NFL section or CBS sports. Found it on SI though, which linked to the original source:

http://www.nationalfootb...P-Sunday-Blitz-1048.html

Quote:
The NFL has looked to a lot of places to make its game safer. It even has looked to Canada. And it may continue to look north.

As recently as a year ago, the competition committee kicked around the idea of a bigger field, CFL style. And this wasn’t the first time the committee has broached the subject. Perhaps the committee will broach the subject again when it meets in Indianapolis in advance of the combine.

The Canadian field is 195 feet wide, compared to the 160 foot wide NFL field. The CFL field also is 30 yards longer, but the widening of the field is what really could impact safety regarding head injuries.

“I’m not so sure we shouldn’t think about widening the field,” former competition committee member Bill Polian said. “It’s a radical idea, but I think it’s worth thinking about. You would have more space and perhaps a safer game. I say that based on my CFL experience. There are less collisions of that type in the Canadian game.”


Click link for more. At this point, I'm not really seeing anything here that would indicate this is something being seriously considered, and I'm certainly glad. As I said before, this would radically change the game, and I would rather have the NFL destroyed quickly by a bunch of sissy ex-players lying about not knowing about the risks (as much as anybody did at the time) than slowly by twisting it into some sickening form with NBA-like scores.
Online yooperfan  
#7 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 4:33:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,634
Applause Received: 648
I don't know about making the game safer but it sure would benefit the offensive aspect of the game.
The rule changes always seem to benefit the offensive aspect of the game.
I'm against it for that reason, I like defense.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:32:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 139
Applause Received: 237
Shall we prohibit defenders from moving completely?
Shall we rule defense out completely?
-These would dramatically cut down on injuries.

Are they admitting the Canadian game is better?

Are we going to merge with the Canadian League?

Are we going to go international?

Should we blend our game with Australian football and English soccer?

These questions and more will be answered and more...stay tuned.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (23m) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (1h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (2h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (2h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (3h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (6h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (6h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (6h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (7h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (7h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (11h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (11h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (11h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (11h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (12h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (12h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (12h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (12h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (12h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (12h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (13h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (15h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (16h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (18h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (18h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Zero2Cool (18h) : keep trying to diminish what the Packers have done and ...
Zero2Cool (18h) : one... that's just how it goes. They let the players play. But go ahead
Zero2Cool (18h) : Everyone knows on the hail mary type passes, those little shoves won't be called. Think replacement refs 2012. So, no did not get away with
Dulak (18h) : ya I think they mentioned that U U ... but you see this alot - even in the dallas game they pushed off at least 1 time (they as in dallas)
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Just rewatched Cobbs hail mary catch in slo mo...he should've been flagged for OPI. Got away with one.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Nope. I like Gus.
beast (21-Jan) : Did you want Anthony Lynn as HC? Cushion Bradley was going to follow Lynn where ever.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines