PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Around The NFL
»
Cullen Jenkins Released by Eagles
Rank: Legend
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States
Applause Given: 1,318
Applause Received: 937
|
I've read a few places saying Cullen Jenkins might be released. This won't happen. They guaranteed his 2013 salary when they restructured his deal last year. So, they are on the hook for $4.5 million no matter what, and there is a roster bonus of $1 million due March 14th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Hall of Famer
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 271
Applause Received: 697
|
The iggles let loose of Jenkins this morning.. let the speculation of a return to begin in 3.. 2.. |
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick
Joined: 2/25/2013(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 22
Applause Received: 29
|
Quote:Jenkins' time in Philadelphia ends just two years into a five-year deal. All of Jenkins' guaranteed money had already been paid. The move saves $5.6 million in cap space. Part of the Eagles' ballyhooed 2011 free agent class, Jenkins ended up tallying just 9.5 sacks in 32 games. He registered seven sacks in 11 contests for the Packers during his walk year in 2010. The emergence of Fletcher Cox and the Eagles' abandonment of the "wide nine" made Jenkins wholly expendable. Still a decent enough pass rusher, Jenkins should draw interest as a role player. We wouldn't rule out a return to Green Bay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Elmwood Park, IL
Applause Given: 63
Applause Received: 111
|
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool  I've read a few places saying Cullen Jenkins might be released. This won't happen. They guaranteed his 2013 salary when they restructured his deal last year. So, they are on the hook for $4.5 million no matter what, and there is a roster bonus of $1 million due March 14th.
via Andrew Brandt's twitter Quote:Eagles release Cullen Jenkins. Good guy, signed him in GB as a reserve/future free agent, developed into valuable and versatile DL. Honestly, if there was any way for Ted to bring Cullen back...he should do it. |
 Formerly known as "G-Force" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 355
Applause Received: 212
|
Cullen Jenkins is older and has some wear, but maybe he's worth bringing back for depth in rotation. 9.5 sacks in the past 2 seasons. I think he does have a couple of years left in him. This is a guy who was a key player for us and should not have been let go IMO. I know he was looking to bank, but I feel the front office could have made a better effort to retain him after winning the SB. He would really be a plus for our DL and our pass rush, as well as in stopping the run. Get him Ted! Edited by user Monday, February 25, 2013 11:57:23 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States
Applause Given: 1,318
Applause Received: 937
|
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool I've read a few places saying Cullen Jenkins might be released. This won't happen. They guaranteed his 2013 salary when they restructured his deal last year. So, they are on the hook for $4.5 million no matter what, and there is a roster bonus of $1 million due March 14th.
lol shows what I know haha Why would you eat $4.5 million to save $1 million? I don't get it. Unless Cullen Jenkins is now garbage?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Elmwood Park, IL
Applause Given: 63
Applause Received: 111
|
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool lol shows what I know haha
Why would you eat $4.5 million to save $1 million? I don't get it. Unless Cullen Jenkins is now garbage?? Maybe they are just ready to make vast changes and start going the "youth" route...regardless of money situations. Though, letting Mike Vick restructure doesn't really prove that right. 10 sacks in 2 seasons is not a bad deal. I'd say if the Packers can get him on the cheaper side, why not add him into the rotation. I'm sure he has a year or two left in the tank. |
Formerly known as "G-Force" |
 1 user applaud's Yerko for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Most Valuable Player
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,391
Applause Received: 761
|
Why does no one say having Jenkins stunts the growth of the younger players like Worthy and Daniels. Maybe even Neal. Certainly anyone they would draft this year.
If Uncle Teddy picks up Jenkins it will be after the draft is over. |
One does not simply walk into Mordor.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick
Joined: 2/25/2013(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 22
Applause Received: 29
|
Quote:
Free agent DE Cullen Jenkins is interested in returning to the Packers.
Jenkins never wanted to leave Green Bay in 2011, and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel isn't shooting down the notion of a reunion. Particularly with Jerel Worthy coming off a major knee injury, Jenkins could help the Packers at right end.
^ |
|
2 users applaud JustinAVA182 for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 82
Applause Received: 77
|
At a minimum he would be good depth, someone to rotate out with Worthy. I'm all for it. |
This space intentionally left blank. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: All Pro
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 671
|
Hell to the no, should we sign Crybaby Cullen. Fuckr could have signed in Green Bay for more than he got in Philly but he had his feelers hurt. Moving on... |
|
2 users applaud DakotaT for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 27
Applause Received: 100
|
All i know is that when Jenkins was playing for The Packers, the defense was better.
Can't hurt to talk with his agent, see if the interest on his end is real.
No reason not to explore every option during this time of the season.
|
DRAFT AND DEVELOPE = FAIL!!!! FIRE TED THOMPSON!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States
Applause Given: 1,318
Applause Received: 937
|
Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan All i know is that when Jenkins was playing for The Packers, the defense was better.
Can't hurt to talk with his agent, see if the interest on his end is real.
No reason not to explore every option during this time of the season.
All I know is when Cullen Jenkins was playing for the Packers, so was Nick Collins. |
|
1 user applaud's Zero2Cool for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 142
|
Would have no problem bringing Cullen back, as long as the price is right. He looks to still have some gas in the tank, He was still able to move and has been pretty healthy in Philly. Much like I thought with Cedric Benson about this time last year. Assuming he is affordable, there isn't a great deal of downside. Bring him in for competition, and also to help develop Worthy, Neil and Daniels. I am sure there are a few things he would be able to teach. |
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick
Joined: 2/25/2013(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 22
Applause Received: 29
|
Quote:
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports the Packers have expressed interest in free agent DL Ricky Jean-Francois.
Jean-Francois, 26, has started just five games since entering the league in 2009, but he was the top backup for the Niners at all three defensive line spots last year. Green Bay would likely give him a chance to start at right end with Jerel Worthy's (knee) season in doubt. San Francisco is expected to let Jean-Francois test the market, even though they would like to re-sign the run-stuffer.
Maybe they wont even try talking to Jenkins. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Around The NFL
»
Cullen Jenkins Released by Eagles
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.