Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
buckeyepackfan  
#21 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 12:04:40 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
That's cause you're not an owner like Gunny and me. [grin1]


Yea, I am, doesn't change my view of things.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#22 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 12:06:35 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
What you don't understand is this, I DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHERE ANY PACKER PLAYER WENT TO COLLEGE!!!!!

I root for ANYONE who is on the field, I don't have my favorites, or guys who don't "live up to my expectations"

When are you going to figure it out?

Nobody is perfect, EVERYBODY gets beat now and then, doesn't matter how much they get paid.

You ARE NOT THE GM, you don't determine the worth of a player.
you ARE NOT THE HC,you don't determine how much playing time a player gets.

How many times in the past 3 years has A.J. Hawk been as you say "torched" over the middle?

I am betting less than 5, yet EVERY one of those plays ended up with a new thread being created on this forum, and you NEVER let a chance go by to let it be known how you feel.

I'm sorry you get bothered by how much any player gets paid, that's Ted Thompsons job.

Which playere earned their contract last year????

Hawk or Bishop????


5 times in three years, huh? Do you even watch the games? The reason he gets yanked off the field on third down is because he too slow to match up with the new breed of TE. You don't pay top dollar for a linebacker that comes off the field on third down. Just like you don't spend $2M on a 5th or 6th receiver that doesn't play special teams. But yeah Buckeye, I'm the asshole for pointing these things out. You win!
buckeyepackfan  
#23 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 12:38:16 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
5 times in three years, huh? Do you even watch the games? The reason he gets yanked off the field on third down is because he too slow to match up with the new breed of TE. You don't pay top dollar for a linebacker that comes off the field on third down. Just like you don't spend $2M on a 5th or 6th receiver that doesn't play special teams. But yeah Buckeye, I'm the asshole for pointing these things out. You win!


Show me!!!
You're the one who claims to know everything, you have to have the games archived.

I remember 4 or 5 plays in the past 3 years that A.J. Hawk absolutely got beat.

Yes I record almost every game, and then break down those games, because I find it quite enjoyable.

What I don't pretend to be is a GM or a coach, thinking that I can evaluate what a player is or isn't worth.

You're damn right I am right, as usual, hell this has been going on for 5 years, sooner or later you will be right.

Just like the 6th or 7th receiver, sooner or later you will be right, I just enjoy you making an ass out of yourself the 3 or 4 years leading up to the point where you are right.

Sooner or later A.J Hawk will be replaced, not because he hasn't earned his money, but because someone will finally come along who plays the position better and can actually stay on the field.

I've said it before, when that day comes, that's when I start rooting for whoever that player is, my only hope is that it is someone who you also think is overpaid that way I can enjoy you once again staing how "dissapointed" you are.

User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#24 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:28:50 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Show me!!!
You're the one who claims to know everything, you have to have the games archived.

I remember 4 or 5 plays in the past 3 years that A.J. Hawk absolutely got beat.

Yes I record almost every game, and then break down those games, because I find it quite enjoyable.

What I don't pretend to be is a GM or a coach, thinking that I can evaluate what a player is or isn't worth.

You're damn right I am right, as usual, hell this has been going on for 5 years, sooner or later you will be right.

Just like the 6th or 7th receiver, sooner or later you will be right, I just enjoy you making an ass out of yourself the 3 or 4 years leading up to the point where you are right.

Sooner or later A.J Hawk will be replaced, not because he hasn't earned his money, but because someone will finally come along who plays the position better and can actually stay on the field.

I've said it before, when that day comes, that's when I start rooting for whoever that player is, my only hope is that it is someone who you also think is overpaid that way I can enjoy you once again staing how "dissapointed" you are.



Just rewatch the San Fran and New Orleans games over the last couple years Mr. Archiver. You're the one that makes an ass of himself with your expert "predictions" that are about 20% right. I guess even the sun shines on a dog's ass once in a while Buckeye. I struck a chord with you on AJ and DD, get over it Susie and let's move on.
Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:33:27 PM(UTC)
It's better to put yourself out there and make a prediction than coming back after the fact with brilliant hindsight 'facts'. :)


I still say we shouldn't know who gets what for financial compensation. It serves us fans no purpose.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#26 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:51:11 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
It's better to put yourself out there and make a prediction than coming back after the fact with brilliant hindsight 'facts'. :)




But Buckeye's the person playing GM not me who actually comments on play of the players. Buckeye must be a Republican - do the crime and point to the other guy.


There's is no way Driver should have been on the team in 2012, hell he stood in street clothes half the year, but he collected his salary didn't he? And AJ Hawk should be taking a paycut - right now. He can't be cut because of the contract he signed. Kudos to Hawk's agent, all of Ohio must be rejoicing.
Zero2Cool  
#27 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:54:47 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
But Buckeye's the person playing GM not me who actually comments on play of the players. Buckeye must be a Republican - do the crime and point to the other guy.


There's is no way Driver should have been on the team in 2012, hell he stood in street clothes half the year, but he collected his salary didn't he? And AJ Hawk should be taking a paycut - right now. He can't be cut because of the contract he signed. Kudos to Hawk's agent, all of Ohio must be rejoicing.


I don't think saying something about a political party helps anything nor is it relevant. Donald Driver earned his way onto the roster. The guy had the best training camp. I was there, I seen it. I posted about it. Do I think he was worth his salary? Not really, but then again, I'd rather be blissfully ignorant on the salaries of players.

I don't think anyone in Ohio cares about A.J. Hawk's contract. Hawk is a two down linebacker who is assignment sure and lacks sizzle. We all knew this BEFORE the draft, before he was drafted. It was said over and over, he has reached his ceiling, but is a very safe pick.

Hawk is a good linebacker. Is he worth his salary? I think an argument could be made that 95% of the athletes in this country do not have a worth in their salary.

You both have opinion's and that's cool. I think ya guys just need to respect that you disagree and carry on to a new topic.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#28 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 2:13:35 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think saying something about a political party helps anything nor is it relevant. Donald Driver earned his way onto the roster. The guy had the best training camp. I was there, I seen it. I posted about it. Do I think he was worth his salary? Not really, but then again, I'd rather be blissfully ignorant on the salaries of players.

I don't think anyone in Ohio cares about A.J. Hawk's contract. Hawk is a two down linebacker who is assignment sure and lacks sizzle. We all knew this BEFORE the draft, before he was drafted. It was said over and over, he has reached his ceiling, but is a very safe pick.

Hawk is a good linebacker. Is he worth his salary? I think an argument could be made that 95% of the athletes in this country do not have a worth in their salary.

You both have opinion's and that's cool. I think ya guys just need to respect that you disagree and carry on to a new topic.


Well I'm not a bitch, Zero, and if someone insults me I'm going to defend myself. And the fricken guy has been needling me.
Zero2Cool  
#29 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 2:18:48 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Well I'm not a bitch, Zero, and if someone insults me I'm going to defend myself. And the fricken guy has been needling me.


Just expand on this topic. He'll understand. :P

http://packershome.com/f...aspx?g=posts&t=15782



No one thinks you're a bitch. You two just have different opinions. Nothing more.
play2win  
#30 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 3:03:15 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post


A.J Hawk could have been rated the best lb in the NFL over his career and you would find something to "BE DISSAPOINTED" about.

Just because he was a 1st rnd pick.

Stop with your bullshit "spins" and just admit no matter how he plays, he will never live up to your "expectations".

2012 A.J, Hawk was paid 6.54 mil, played every game
2012 D. Bissop was paid 4.25 mil, played 5 ...6 games?

Which player earned their contract min 2012????

Why are you not all over Bishop for being overpaid????
Why are you not all over bishop for not "playing up to his potential?"


I think these comments are completely off the tracks. What Packers fan wouldn't love to see their MLB be one of the best in the NFL? Wouldn't appreciate that? I wish Hawk was in the top 5 or 10 MLBs!!! He's not even that! But, he is paid more than any SF linebacker. WTF?!!!!

I posted unbiased ranking of all LBs and all ILBs in another thread. Hawk didn't rank in the top 50 LBs, and was ranked somewhere around 32-34 amongst ILBs off the top of my head. He is way overpaid.

Hawk burned over the middle only 5 times in the past 3 seasons. Did you have your glasses on? The clear ones?
macbob  
#31 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 4:12:42 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
What I don't pretend to be is a GM or a coach, thinking that I can evaluate what a player is or isn't worth.


I'm not pretending to be a GM or a coach when I say I think he needs to restructure his contract down or the Packers should go another route. I'm expressing my opinion. Which is what people do on this site.

Time will tell whether or not the Packers GM decides to keep AJ at his current cost or asks him to restructure lower. Time will also tell if AJ agress to restructure and what the Packers GM will do if he doesn't.

That's what they're paying Ted Thompson to do.

I like AJ. He's assignment sure, and a good leader on defense. But do I like him $5.5M worth (his base + misc bonuses)? No.

I'm expressing the opinion that if I were GM I think there are bigger needs on the team that I would rather spend those millions on than a two-down LB.

If it's now a requirement that we have to be a GM or a coach to express an opinion on how a player is playing, what a player is worth, etc, then I think
warhawk  
#32 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 5:29:39 PM(UTC)
Hawk is a steady player but not dynamic so the question is what is steady worth? He doesn't sack the QB or force a lot of fumbles or even make many tackles behind the LOS. He's not really even stout against the run although I did see him more involved up by the LOS then I have in past years.
Again, you have LB's that make dynamic plays but screw up assignments too but you don't hear about that as much as the sack in the 4th qtr with the opposing team driving the ball.
If he did that a little more often there wouldn't be the need for this much discussion.
steveishere  
#33 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 10:35:07 PM(UTC)
lol buckeye why are you acting like people here have some personal problem with Hawk? Some of your comments are completely absurd. If Hawk was the baddest ass linebacker in the world (or even a top 20 baddest ass linebacker) everyone here would love him. Nobody here dislikes Hawk because he's AJ Hawk, they dislike him because he makes a shit ton of cash and is completely meh. Regardless of where he was drafted he's just not that great of a player.
Zero2Cool  
#34 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 5:49:56 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
lol buckeye why are you acting like people here have some personal problem with Hawk? Some of your comments are completely absurd. If Hawk was the baddest ass linebacker in the world (or even a top 20 baddest ass linebacker) everyone here would love him. Nobody here dislikes Hawk because he's AJ Hawk, they dislike him because he makes a shit ton of cash and is completely meh. Regardless of where he was drafted he's just not that great of a player.


Shouldn't that disdain feeling be aimed towards Ted Thompson though? He's the one who approved the contract.
Yerko  
#35 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 9:34:05 AM(UTC)
AJ Hawk is a serviceable ILB. Serviceable ILBs do not deserve to be the 4th highest paid on a team. Restructure or bring your talents to another team.

Desmond Bishop is coming off a nasty injury and still is in rehab. Last heard, he said he was around 80%. Risk of re-injury...high.

DJ Smith is coming off a nasty injury as well. No news on recovery so far. Knee injury so mark it as a risk of re-injury...high.

Brad Jones is a career back-up.
Quote:
Would you rather allocate those dollars to a younger player like Brad Jones?

No.

Dezman Moses is still a rookie. I like what he has done but it isn't enough to put stock in a starting role for him.

With all that said, while I think the best option is to keep AJ Hawk with the Packers with a restructured contract and also draft an ILB within the first 3 rounds that can come in and have an instant impact. To me, it just seems like regardless of what the Packers do with this position, they are gambling for next season.
play2win  
#36 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 9:36:15 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Shouldn't that disdain feeling be aimed towards Ted Thompson though? He's the one who approved the contract.


You are correct Sir!

I really, really like Ted Thompson, and I think we are lucky to have such a dedicated GM heading our team. However, he does have some misgivings in hanging onto "his" players a bit too tightly. The Hawk contract was a pretty severe overpay, only made so because Hawk made ZERO FFs, ZERO FRs, ZERO INTs, and only 3 PDef since signing that contract after winning the SB. He had ZERO PDef through 16 games last season.

I appreciate his 4.5 sacks in 2 years, and his leading the team in tackles, his seemingly improved play in 2012. But I am aware, fully aware, that he does not make many, if any, game changing plays that are often required of the QB of your defense in the middle. His being paid as one of the best LBs in the NFL, and not delivering top LB play. That is what most fans find fault with.

Ted signed him to that monster contract.

I think Ted holds to maxims a bit too often. Draft and develop. Re-sign your own players. Don't overpay. Well, if you are re-signing players who can't get you to the next level just because they are yours, your draft and develop players, that may be problematic. And, if he refuses to pay a top talent at an important position on our team to let him "test the market," he ought to make certain that he has a plan in place to cover that loss of talent. I believe that may be one of his greatest faults. It can take years for him to cover the loss of true impact players.

Getting a stud FA, or two, can go a long way toward assembling a serious talent group to go all the way. As for Hawk, his contract is limiting our options. He is a giant cap hit, and we are not getting the value for that in his level of play.
play2win  
#37 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 9:45:23 AM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
AJ Hawk is a serviceable ILB. Serviceable ILBs do not deserve to be the 4th highest paid on a team. Restructure or bring your talents to another team.

Desmond Bishop is coming off a nasty injury and still is in rehab. Last heard, he said he was around 80%. Risk of re-injury...high.

DJ Smith is coming off a nasty injury as well. No news on recovery so far. Knee injury so mark it as a risk of re-injury...high.

Brad Jones is a career back-up.

No.

Dezman Moses is still a rookie. I like what he has done but it isn't enough to put stock in a starting role for him.

With all that said, while I think the best option is to keep AJ Hawk with the Packers with a restructured contract and also draft an ILB within the first 3 rounds that can come in and have an instant impact. To me, it just seems like regardless of what the Packers do with this position, they are gambling for next season.


What the Packers really need, are 3 more top talents at LB. We have one. Pretty important to have exceptional LB play if your D is running a 3-4...

Brad Jones is just into the OK category - that was an improvement from the NOTHING category of the previous year. We shouldn't be counting on Jones, Smith, Hawk, Walden, Lattimore, Zombo. Bishop is a question mark, and so is Perry. I'm hopeful for Moses and Manning. The only one we can count on is Matthews, and even he has trouble staying healthy through 16 games!

This really makes me feel badly for Capers, because it is clear he has not had a whole lot to work with. Our DL sucks. Our Safeties have been struggling since losing Collins. IMO, we must add DE, NT, ILB (2) OLB (1) and S (1) this offseason to improve that talent base. Hell, why not a DT too? All of those positions require upgrades.

Ted has been "Bargain Basementing" our defense, while severely overpaying Hawk as some kind of crazy overcompensation for what? His selecting him #5 overall all those years ago? Look what that has done. Now he's got the only two DL that matter on this team coming up for re-signings in Raji and Pickett. Should be interesting. He has GOT to throw some cash at this front 7 group.
Pack93z  
#38 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 9:46:46 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
You are correct Sir!

I really, really like Ted Thompson, and I think we are lucky to have such a dedicated GM heading our team. However, he does have some misgivings in hanging onto "his" players a bit too tightly. The Hawk contract was a pretty severe overpay, only made so because Hawk made ZERO FFs, ZERO FRs, ZERO INTs, and only 3 PDef since signing that contract after winning the SB. He had ZERO PDef through 16 games last season.

I appreciate his 4.5 sacks in 2 years, and his leading the team in tackles, his seemingly improved play in 2012. But I am aware, fully aware, that he does not make many, if any, game changing plays that are often required of the QB of your defense in the middle. His being paid as one of the best LBs in the NFL, and not delivering top LB play. That is what most fans find fault with.

Ted signed him to that monster contract.

I think Ted holds to maxims a bit too often. Draft and develop. Re-sign your own players. Don't overpay. Well, if you are re-signing players who can't get you to the next level just because they are yours, your draft and develop players, that may be problematic. And, if he refuses to pay a top talent at an important position on our team to let him "test the market," he ought to make certain that he has a plan in place to cover that loss of talent. I believe that may be one of his greatest faults. It can take years for him to cover the loss of true impact players.

Getting a stud FA, or two, can go a long way toward assembling a serious talent group to go all the way. As for Hawk, his contract is limiting our options. He is a giant cap hit, and we are not getting the value for that in his level of play.


Actually I think it was a move, that at the time, there were some serious questions in the depth department at the interior linebacker coupled with the release of Nick Barnett. Remember this team was coming off a SB win with a ton of players sitting on the IR.

Basically it was maybe an overpay to ensure some continuity for the defense.. especially one that calls out the plays.

If anything, especially with Jennings as an example, Ted has shown that he is impartial in terms of "his" players vs not his. I think it always comes back to the same formula, with these variables:(Value, Supply, Age and duration of contract)

Supply being on difficult it may be to replace the player.. IE do we have a suitable replacement on the roster or can I obtain one via the Draft or at value on the FA market.

play2win  
#39 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 10:00:00 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually I think it was a move, that at the time, there were some serious questions in the depth department at the interior linebacker coupled with the release of Nick Barnett. Remember this team was coming off a SB win with a ton of players sitting on the IR.

Basically it was maybe an overpay to ensure some continuity for the defense.. especially one that calls out the plays.

If anything, especially with Jennings as an example, Ted has shown that he is impartial in terms of "his" players vs not his. I think it always comes back to the same formula, with these variables:(Value, Supply, Age and duration of contract)

Supply being on difficult it may be to replace the player.. IE do we have a suitable replacement on the roster or can I obtain one via the Draft or at value on the FA market.



I would offer Hawk, Finley and Justin Harrell as some examples... impartial? Jennings is a very simple case ala James Jones. We'll see what other teams are willing to pony up. Ted has been stockpiling WRs, so the loss of Jennings to a monster offer won't hurt quite as much.

The "at value" re FA market thing is starting to get me a bit. The only impact FAs Ted has really signed to our D are Pickett and Woodson. Those signings happened at the beginning of his tenure. Since that time, any FAs signed have been strictly bottom of scale types who were 2nd or 3rd string players on their respective teams.

Ted has not had an impact signing in FA for our defense in years.
Pack93z  
#40 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 10:17:38 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I would offer Hawk, Finley and Justin Harrell as some examples... impartial?


For every Hawk I offer a Brohm (2nd),Lee (2nd), Thompson (4th), Rouse (3rd), Hodge (3rd) for examples.

I think Ted gives a pick every chance to contribute.. and if they can't he moves on. Brohm and Rouse were moved quickly off the roster..

Hawk and Finley contribute.. I think Finley contributes more in presence than overall production in terms of what strain he places on the defense in terms of match up.

Further more.. if the worst offense Ted makes is overpaying a solid NFL linebacker in Hawk.. well then I think we are in pretty good shape. :)

This from a guy that has been banging on Hawk since about 2008 for his reactive play in place of using his instincts that made him special in college.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (28m) : then again, I maybe too optimistic for my own good :/
Mucky Tundra (28m) : I think Hundley can handle; can Dom without the offense, that remains to be seen
uffda udfa (9h) : He ain't done yet for this season. Can Hundley handle?
uffda udfa (9h) : Aaron Rodgers finally communicates on Instagram: COMEBACK STARTS NOW
Barfarn (19h) : Bart's not on injury report, he's startin'
Smokey (19h) : I hope that means that he (Bart Starr) is in better health these days .
Zero2Cool (19h) : Bart Starr returning to Lambeau Field for Packers-Saints game Sunday
Porforis (19-Oct) : Glad to have King back. And House. Packers need 'em.
Zero2Cool (19-Oct) : Good! smack some posts in the forum right?!? :-) can't wait to read it
uffda udfa (18-Oct) : No more clutter.
Cheesey (18-Oct) : Go get him Uncle Ted!!
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Former Packers pass-rusher Datone Jones is back on the market.
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Good news for #Packers secondary: rookie CB Kevin King and vet CB Davon House (quad) both practiced. King has cleared concussion protocol.
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Vince Biegel back on practice field!!
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Maybe this little shout has no value if people gonna use it instead of the forum.
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : He's not writing. He's shouting, and its making the shout kind of without point with the clutter.
buckeyepackfan (18-Oct) : Just like last year at 4-6. The guy is just too funny!
buckeyepackfan (18-Oct) : GOOD news Uffda is already all but writing The Packers off for 2017!
uffda udfa (18-Oct) : Masturbation talk from Barfan? Nothing could make me COME back, quicker.
wpr (18-Oct) : Maybe the shout box needs to take a timeout. People keep using it. ;)
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Why do this is in shout? So frustrating. Post in forums. Thanks
Barfarn (18-Oct) : Masterbation will relieve some of that nervous tension!
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Now, a guy they really liked and have groomed for 3 years is the guy. Tons of toys on O. Let's see how it runs with a great coach, now.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : The Flynn Patriots game has been used to say that he is. Seneca and Scott showed otherwise.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Hundley is going to settle the debate once and for all in whether Mike McCarthy is a great coach, or not.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Doesn't speak well to the talent acquired by the org, does it? Easy to say talent is great until Rodgers is gone and you have to see it wit
Porforis (17-Oct) : Could Sam Bradford come into the Packers and post a winning record from here on out? Are there any non-starters in the NFL that could?
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : Teddy is replaceable. Aaron is not. Vikings have a really good defense. We do not. Understand??
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : You are wise enough to know the difference. Right?
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Here's one for you, Z. Vikes lose Teddy B. and go out and aggressively get Bradford. Packers lose 12 and go out and get a UDFA.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : :) Evans had a pre-draft visit with Packers.
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : Put it in a topic. My lord why so difficult lol
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/jerod-evans?id=2558099
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/former-virginia-tech-qb-jerod-evans-issues-warning-after-going-undrafted-043017
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Oh, Jerod Evans formerly of Va Tech is our Hokie QB plan
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

19-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

18-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

18-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Oct / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / gotarace

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

Headlines