Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline dhazer  
#1 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 7:38:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2016Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 100
Applause Received: 338
What do you guys think about throwing a few bucks at Joshua Cribbs? We saw what a return game can do for us and he is proven and it would take Cobb off the return game and we would probably still be as good if not better.

I was just wondering what you guys would think?
Offline Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 7:39:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,059
What do you define as a few bucks?
Offline Pack93z  
#3 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:17:47 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
My only concern with Cribbs is he is constantly banged up.. it seems never ending that he is on the injury report with knee/leg concerns.
Offline Wade  
#4 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 6:24:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
No.

The key to the return game is the people blocking. If we have decent backup talent that can block, you don't need a high priced returner. Of course being able to find quality return game blockers is open to question: since we cant even seem to find enough people who can block on offense, it's probably a crap shoot whether the team can find enough 2nd/3rd stringers from non-OL positions who can also block.

IMO, the only positions where Ted Thompson should look to free agents outside of his own are OL, DL, LB, and, maybe, DB.

Offline DakotaT  
#5 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 6:52:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
We already have this area covered with Ross. Take away that muff against the 9ers, and he did a real good job last year as Cobb's replacement. He eplodes upfield the way you're suppose to.

Isn't Cribbs long in the tooth already?
Offline wpr  
#6 Posted : Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:23:29 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,050
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
We already have this area covered with Ross. Take away that muff against the 9ers, and he did a real good job last year as Cobb's replacement. He eplodes upfield the way you're suppose to.

Isn't Cribbs long in the tooth already?


I was thinking the same. I would rather have Ross return kicks than a FA who will be 30 before the season begins.
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#7 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 6:44:02 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2015Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Applause Given: 577
Applause Received: 715
Cribbs is old and special teams is dominated by young, fast bodies. Ross did fine except for the botch against SF.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 3/4/2013(UTC)
Offline Nonstopdrivel  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 8:13:03 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Applause Given: 409
Applause Received: 351
I don't want to wax too philosophical here, but returners are the single most overrated position on the field, followed closely by wide receivers. As fans, we think they have a big impact on the game precisely because their flashy plays are so rare that they stick in our memories, whereas we tend to overlook the players who do contribute on every single play. (I could go into a long explanation of the neurophysiological mechanisms that make us unable to avoid this mistake, but for now I'll just say to look up "long-term potentiation" if you are curious.)

Returners may affect the outcomes of a few games here and there, but over the course of a season, their impact on a team's win/loss record is statistically indistinguishable from zero. A buddy of mine who is doing postdoc work in biometrics applied the statistical tools of his trade (principal component analysis in particular) to a gigantic body of data and showed this pretty convincingly. Returners hardly make a blip against the background noise.

Think about Randall Cobb, for example. As fun as he was to watch, how many games were actually decided by his return skills? None. His most dramatic return performance came in a game the Packers lost. He made much more of an impact as a receiver -- but it was an impact many other receivers could have made, especially with Rodgers throwing the ball to him. Receivers are largely interchangeable parts these days.

It would be a massive waste of money to chase down another returner in the hopes of getting a few extra yards of field position. Plenty of studies have shown that starting field position doesn't have anywhere near the effect on a team's scoring potential as the pundits and talking heads make it seem.

The Packers should be focusing on revamping the positions that would make a substantive impact in every game: putting some beef on the offensive line to protect Rodgers and finding a reliable running back would be a great start. Adding another defensive back or two would be helpful as well.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 3/4/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 8:26:18 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,059
Good to have Rourke back, now to dust off my Thesaurus.com and Dictionary.com links ...
thanks Post received 3 applause.
wpr on 3/4/2013(UTC), Yerko on 3/4/2013(UTC), gbguy20 on 3/4/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 4, 2013 9:18:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
Nonstopdrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't want to wax too philosophical here, but returners are the single most overrated position on the field, followed closely by wide receivers. As fans, we think they have a big impact on the game precisely because their flashy plays are so rare that they stick in our memories, whereas we tend to overlook the players who do contribute on every single play. (I could go into a long explanation of the neurophysiological mechanisms that make us unable to avoid this mistake, but for now I'll just say to look up "long-term potentiation" if you are curious.)

Returners may affect the outcomes of a few games here and there, but over the course of a season, their impact on a team's win/loss record is statistically indistinguishable from zero. A buddy of mine who is doing postdoc work in biometrics applied the statistical tools of his trade (principal component analysis in particular) to a gigantic body of data and showed this pretty convincingly. Returners hardly make a blip against the background noise.

Think about Randall Cobb, for example. As fun as he was to watch, how many games were actually decided by his return skills? None. His most dramatic return performance came in a game the Packers lost. He made much more of an impact as a receiver -- but it was an impact many other receivers could have made, especially with Rodgers throwing the ball to him. Receivers are largely interchangeable parts these days.

It would be a massive waste of money to chase down another returner in the hopes of getting a few extra yards of field position. Plenty of studies have shown that starting field position doesn't have anywhere near the effect on a team's scoring potential as the pundits and talking heads make it seem.

The Packers should be focusing on revamping the positions that would make a substantive impact in every game: putting some beef on the offensive line to protect Rodgers and finding a reliable running back would be a great start. Adding another defensive back or two would be helpful as well.


That said, I knew it was a mistake to put Ross back there in the playoffs. LOL. That clutch situation impacted our whole season.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (17m) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (39m) : go pack go ?
wpr (49m) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (56m) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (1h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (1h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (1h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (2h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (2h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (2h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (3h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (3h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (3h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (3h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (3h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (3h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (5h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (5h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (5h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (5h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (5h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (5h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (5h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (5h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (5h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (5h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (5h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (5h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (5h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (5h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (5h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
uffda udfa (5h) : Mike Pereira explained on Twitter what he should've on FOX.
Smokey (6h) : Keeping them thread separated is the key. Fan Shout is for any and all members to post as they please. No one voted you King U2 .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

31m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer


Packers Headlines