Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:00:24 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 146
JerseyAl said:
In the shadow of the last two postseason losses, I’ve seen a number of Green Bay Packers fans itching for Ted Thompson to make some big roster moves. Their basic premise is that star quarterback Aaron Rodgers doesn’t have much time left to get to another Super Bowl. It’s either now or never if the team wants to make another serious run at it.
Offline nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:19:34 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
Packers_RSS said: Go to Quoted Post


There is some urgency, but when a QB pisses a season away statwhoring, I tend not to feel so bad for him.

Favre for instance pissed away more than one Conference Championship.
Offline play2win  
#3 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:34:03 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
nerdmann, your stat whoring premise is not something readily embraced. But, you may have a point.

For years I was pissed at Mike Sherman for not running the ball more. Really pissed. It wasn't until after he was gone that I realized it may have been Favre checking out of run plays to pass instead. That seems more plausible.

Now, is Rodgers falling into the same trap, wanting to throw, checking out of designated run plays for the pass option? It is possible. I just feel the Head Coach has got to have a firm handle on that, and it is McCarthy's task to insure we have a more balanced run/pass attack. At least, I would hope he would see that. This is a huge problem in Green Bay IMO. I feel our offense should establish more of a run oriented approach. Take some of the heat off of Rodgers, and dictate more to a defense, rather than the other way around. We get pass happy and we get predictable. We haven't been running enough to establish the run as a dominant part of our offense. We just haven't, and it shows.

That should come to an end. I hope Mike McCarthy changes that for us in Green Bay, and that Ted lands a punishing back and maybe some better talent on the OL to help make it a reality.

As for raw stat whoring, I would think Rodgers has more character in those situations than Favre. Favre seemed to be all about Favre. Rodgers doesn't seem that way.
Offline Porforis  
#4 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:53:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 346
Applause Received: 645
I'd post our run-pass stats for the 14th time but people just ignore anything that flies in the face of what they've convinced is true so meh.
Offline nerdmann  
#5 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:25:28 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
I'd post our run-pass stats for the 14th time but people just ignore anything that flies in the face of what they've convinced is true so meh.


Is there a stat for holding onto the ball 8+ seconds even when there's guys open underneath?
Offline Porforis  
#6 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:39:10 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 346
Applause Received: 645
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Is there a stat for holding onto the ball 8+ seconds even when there's guys open underneath?


No, but they're working on it. They're going to start tracking it once they start tracking pointless interceptions thrown into triple coverage when there's people open underneath or the ball can be thrown away. Also, people aren't just sitting there underneath as much as you'd like to think.

http://packershome.com/y...coverage.aspx#post225271

Saw that crap for the better part of the season - WRs get disrupted at the point of attack, Rodgers needs to go to his 3rd or 4th read if he's lucky or more likely, has to scramble around to avoid the sack after 2 seconds.

Summary: Rodgers isn't perfect, he oftentimes tries to make things happen when he should just throw the ball away and sometimes he ignores the shallow routes. But considering how much constant bitching I heard all season long about all of our routes being 10 yards deep or deeper, not sure how that meshes with your idea that this was a regular occurrence where he was just standing there in the pocket waiting for someone to get open 40 yards downfield. 2011 and to a lesser extent 2010? Sure, we forced it downfield way too much. 2012? We took a MUCH more balanced approach between running and passing - where we failed earlier on in the season is with a lack of quickly developing routes or quick outs for Rodgers.
Offline play2win  
#7 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 11:11:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
No, but they're working on it. They're going to start tracking it once they start tracking pointless interceptions thrown into triple coverage when there's people open underneath or the ball can be thrown away. Also, people aren't just sitting there underneath as much as you'd like to think.

http://packershome.com/y...coverage.aspx#post225271

Saw that crap for the better part of the season - WRs get disrupted at the point of attack, Rodgers needs to go to his 3rd or 4th read if he's lucky or more likely, has to scramble around to avoid the sack after 2 seconds.

Summary: Rodgers isn't perfect, he oftentimes tries to make things happen when he should just throw the ball away and sometimes he ignores the shallow routes. But considering how much constant bitching I heard all season long about all of our routes being 10 yards deep or deeper, not sure how that meshes with your idea that this was a regular occurrence where he was just standing there in the pocket waiting for someone to get open 40 yards downfield. 2011 and to a lesser extent 2010? Sure, we forced it downfield way too much. 2012? We took a MUCH more balanced approach between running and passing - where we failed earlier on in the season is with a lack of quickly developing routes or quick outs for Rodgers.


You are definitely right Porforis. We ran quite a bit more than in 2011. From an attempts standpoint we ranked #16 in 2012 with 433 v. #27 in 2011 with 395. We were only #20 in yds at 1702 in 2012 v. #27 in 2011 with 1503 yds.

We had a lot of stuff going on offensively to deal with. Tons of injuries on OL, WR and at RB. Plus, teams had figured us out, knew how to defend us, forcing adjustments. All in all, our offense did fairly well considering, dropping to #13 in Total Offense in 2013 compared to #3 in 2011. FYI, in 2010 we were #9 overall (#24 rushing/#9 passing).

Our OL play needs to be better, and our RB play needs to improve. Play calling a more run heavy attack would be helpful. So would keeping our WRs, and everybody else healthy.
Offline GBkrzygrl  
#8 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 11:20:40 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 2/18/2013(UTC)
Location: Wisconsin
Applause Received: 5
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
nerdmann, your stat whoring premise is not something readily embraced. But, you may have a point.

Now, is Rodgers falling into the same trap, wanting to throw, checking out of designated run plays for the pass option? It is possible. I just feel the Head Coach has got to have a firm handle on that, and it is McCarthy's task to insure we have a more balanced run/pass attack. At least, I would hope he would see that. This is a huge problem in Green Bay IMO. I feel our offense should establish more of a run oriented approach. Take some of the heat off of Rodgers, and dictate more to a defense, rather than the other way around. We get pass happy and we get predictable. We haven't been running enough to establish the run as a dominant part of our offense. We just haven't, and it shows.

That should come to an end. I hope Mike McCarthy changes that for us in Green Bay, and that Ted lands a punishing back and maybe some better talent on the OL to help make it a reality.

As for raw stat whoring, I would think Rodgers has more character in those situations than Favre. Favre seemed to be all about Favre. Rodgers doesn't seem that way.


I am beginning to wonder the same thing, especially this year. So far I like what I have read about Aaron. He appears to be as down to earth as anyone making millions of $ can be. But I got very frustrated this season with all the sacks he took. I know some of it was on the OL, but there were so many times I was yelling at the tv, "throw it away". To be honest, I don't think we have had a RB that we could rely on and with all the injuries to the RB's this year, maybe Aaron didn't trust them.... I don't know.

I think I will actually break down and Crying if Ted Thompson chooses a RB with an injury history again. If Aaron trusts the running game and they can get a balanced attack, maybe we can make back to the SB. Course we also need help on the defensive side of the ball. *sigh*
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 11:25:03 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
GBkrzygrl said: Go to Quoted Post
I am beginning to wonder the same thing, especially this year. So far I like what I have read about Aaron. He appears to be as down to earth as anyone making millions of $ can be. But I got very frustrated this season with all the sacks he took. I know some of it was on the OL, but there were so many times I was yelling at the tv, "throw it away". To be honest, I don't think we have had a RB that we could rely on and with all the injuries to the RB's this year, maybe Aaron didn't trust them.... I don't know.

I think I will actually break down and Crying if Ted Thompson chooses a RB with an injury history again. If Aaron trusts the running game and they can get a balanced attack, maybe we can make back to the SB. Course we also need help on the defensive side of the ball. *sigh*


Aaron isn't megalomaniacal like Brent, but he's got that thing where he clings to his bitterness over every little sleight he's ever experienced.

Get over it dude. Adhere to fundamentals. The stats will come.
Offline nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Thursday, March 7, 2013 11:26:02 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
You are definitely right Porforis. We ran quite a bit more than in 2011. From an attempts standpoint we ranked #16 in 2012 with 433 v. #27 in 2011 with 395. We were only #20 in yds at 1702 in 2012 v. #27 in 2011 with 1503 yds.

We had a lot of stuff going on offensively to deal with. Tons of injuries on OL, WR and at RB. Plus, teams had figured us out, knew how to defend us, forcing adjustments. All in all, our offense did fairly well considering, dropping to #13 in Total Offense in 2013 compared to #3 in 2011. FYI, in 2010 we were #9 overall (#24 rushing/#9 passing).

Our OL play needs to be better, and our RB play needs to improve. Play calling a more run heavy attack would be helpful. So would keeping our WRs, and everybody else healthy.


Teams know all they have to do is shut down the deep routes. Aaron will not consistently take the short yardage underneath.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (11m) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (32m) : go pack go ?
wpr (42m) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (50m) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (1h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (1h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (1h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (2h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (2h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (2h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (3h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (3h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (3h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (3h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (3h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (3h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (5h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (5h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (5h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (5h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (5h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (5h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (5h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (5h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (5h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (5h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (5h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (5h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (5h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (5h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (5h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
uffda udfa (5h) : Mike Pereira explained on Twitter what he should've on FOX.
Smokey (5h) : Keeping them thread separated is the key. Fan Shout is for any and all members to post as they please. No one voted you King U2 .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer


Packers Headlines