Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
play2win  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 11:09:36 AM(UTC)
Amazing... updated today.

http://www.nationalfootb...wl-odds-reboot-1641.html

Only NE, SF, DEN, SEA ahead of us, in that order. We are ahead of ATL, NO, NYG, PIT, BAL... WAS, CHI...
josherwan  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 12:13:52 PM(UTC)
I would love to see us back at the big game ... But with all the personnel changes and unwillingness to invest the $ I will be curious to see how the season comes together...
play2win  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 1:24:38 PM(UTC)
josherwan, me too!

It is really funny, looking at this giant investment fans and teams have made these past couple weeks/months on FA in energy, money, players etc, but if we can get some guys back healthy and add another 3 or 4 serious contributors via the draft, who knows? It could work ala 2010.

I didn't think it would be possible. Then, I changed up my perspective a bit. We'll see. I'm curious to see what happens much like yourself.
nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 3:39:23 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Amazing... updated today.

http://www.nationalfootb...wl-odds-reboot-1641.html

Only NE, SF, DEN, SEA ahead of us, in that order. We are ahead of ATL, NO, NYG, PIT, BAL... WAS, CHI...


We have to prove we can beat SF.

Seattle? They don't scare me.
warhawk  
#5 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 5:34:01 PM(UTC)
We will be right in there with this upper tier of teams. It comes down to who gets hot at the right time. In the last three years I would say the strongest looking team or even the best team through the balance of the season did NOT win the SB.

I don't know how the Pack pulled it out with all the injuries in '10 and everyone knows the Giants and Ravens were no where near being the best team throughout those seasons.

But they were all the best teams when it got to crunch time. Mojo. I don't know what that is and there is no way to bottle it or predict what team finds it at the right time.

Chemistry. The variable that makes winning it all so damn hard to do.
blueleopard  
#6 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 5:37:48 PM(UTC)
Heh. They certainly scare me.

They have a very physical defense that gets the job done. They sacked Aaron Rodgers 8 times in the first half in their game. That shows their physicality. They even have a very strong, no pun intended, secondary that gets the push off every WR corps they go up against.

When we went against them, they had a pretty pedestrian offense that relied solely on Marshawn Lynch. Now the playbook is wide open for Russell Wilson and Seattle's version of the read-option, and they added the dynamic Percy Harvin who is bound to present us with some problems.

Beatable, yes. But at this point they're the better football team.
DoddPower  
#7 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 6:13:33 PM(UTC)
blueleopard said: Go to Quoted Post
Heh. They certainly scare me.

They have a very physical defense that gets the job done. They sacked Aaron Rodgers 8 times in the first half in their game. That shows their physicality. They even have a very strong, no pun intended, secondary that gets the push off every WR corps they go up against.

When we went against them, they had a pretty pedestrian offense that relied solely on Marshawn Lynch. Now the playbook is wide open for Russell Wilson and Seattle's version of the read-option, and they added the dynamic Percy Harvin who is bound to present us with some problems.

Beatable, yes. But at this point they're the better football team.


Eh, I'll believe that win they ACTUALLY beat the Packers. So far, the 'new' Seahawks are 0-1 against the Packers, considering the fail mary. They're a good team, and have appeared to improve themselves on paper this off season. But again, it goes back to being Champions in March vs. Winners in December +. I don't see how they can be labeled "the better football team" at this point. A better defense, yes, but that's about as far as I would go. A lot changes between now and mid-to-late season.

Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 6:19:05 PM(UTC)
warhawk said: Go to Quoted Post
We will be right in there with this upper tier of teams. It comes down to who gets hot at the right time. In the last three years I would say the strongest looking team or even the best team through the balance of the season did NOT win the SB.

I don't know how the Pack pulled it out with all the injuries in '10 and everyone knows the Giants and Ravens were no where near being the best team throughout those seasons.

But they were all the best teams when it got to crunch time. Mojo. I don't know what that is and there is no way to bottle it or predict what team finds it at the right time.

Chemistry. The variable that makes winning it all so damn hard to do.


One aspect that I often see overlooked when people say the Packers simply got hot at the right time is the fact that they were never behind by more than seven points during the entire season. That's something that is rarely ever accomplished and only is accomplished by a really good team.
Laser Gunns  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 7:09:41 PM(UTC)
doddpower said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, I'll believe that win they ACTUALLY beat the Packers. So far, the 'new' Seahawks are 0-1 against the Packers, considering the fail mary. They're a good team, and have appeared to improve themselves on paper this off season. But again, it goes back to being Champions in March vs. Winners in December +. I don't see how they can be labeled "the better football team" at this point. A better defense, yes, but that's about as far as I would go. A lot changes between now and mid-to-late season.




We played Seattle at a time when they weren't letting Wilson do too much. As the play book opened up later in the Season, Seattle's offense exploded (3 50pt games in a row).

If we had played Seattle again last year, Our D have been destroyed worse than what SF did to us.
nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 7:45:52 PM(UTC)
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
We played Seattle at a time when they weren't letting Wilson do too much. As the play book opened up later in the Season, Seattle's offense exploded (3 50pt games in a row).

If we had played Seattle again last year, Our D have been destroyed worse than what SF did to us.


And if Mike and Aaron weren't stat whoring by completely abandoning the run, SEA wouldn't have been able to pin their ears back and get 8 sacks.

Dulak  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, March 19, 2013 4:39:29 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Amazing... updated today.

http://www.nationalfootb...wl-odds-reboot-1641.html

Only NE, SF, DEN, SEA ahead of us, in that order. We are ahead of ATL, NO, NYG, PIT, BAL... WAS, CHI...


little heads up for those that might bet -
If the odds arnt great atm - wait till just before the playoffs (or when you think your team has it made).

Or you could bet on a long shot right now if you think they are going to be lucky ...

I didnt bet last year (no mula and the teams I liked; ya packers were first on my list) had crap odds.

Baltimore actually had decent odds before the play offs started

play2win  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:11:37 AM(UTC)
It's all about our D. We are counting on good players coming back strong from injury (Bishop and Perry) and a lot of holes being filled this draft on the DL.

I just don't see it, but I guess if we have the shot near playoff time, and we can be healthy...
DoddPower  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:21:51 PM(UTC)
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
We played Seattle at a time when they weren't letting Wilson do too much. As the play book opened up later in the Season, Seattle's offense exploded (3 50pt games in a row).

If we had played Seattle again last year, Our D have been destroyed worse than what SF did to us.


To me, that's just speculation. Every game is different. The Packers game against the Seahawks was one of the worst coached first halves of NFL football I've seen in some (by the Packers). This season will be a new season with new players, injuries, schemes, etc. I still like the Rodgers led Green Bay Packers chances against the Seahawks, although obviously it could go anyway based on a few plays.

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : welcome back ted lol over react much? HAHAHA SIT DOWN
packerfanoutwest (7h) : go to the chat room
gbguy20 (7h) : at least stay in the teens
gbguy20 (7h) : Fucking Bullshit
Cheesey (7h) : Welcome back, Ted.
Bigbyfan (7h) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (8h) : Interesting
isocleas2 (8h) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (8h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (9h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (12h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (12h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (12h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (12h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (13h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (13h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (13h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (14h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (14h) : Packers
Smokey (14h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (14h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (14h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (15h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (15h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (15h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (15h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (18h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (18h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (19h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (19h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

13h / Random Babble / Cheesey

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines