Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:59:33 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 77

JerseyAl wrote:
Our second article focuses on A.J. Hawk and his current contract restructuring. Make no bones about it, this is a pay cut for Hawk; however, it’s not like he’s getting peanuts for the deal.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#2 Posted : Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:59:35 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 77

JerseyAl wrote:
One of the hardest things for the average fan to comprehend is how NFL contracts work and how they apply to a team’s salary cap. There are many complicated elements, rules, and exceptions that can be hard to sort out. In this series, my goal is to help you better understand how this whole system works, plus what it means to the Green Bay Packers’ current salary cap and contract concerns.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 3/21/2013(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#3 Posted : Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:31:57 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

That article does a terrible job of explaining his restructure. It tried to get to fancy by talking about Dead Money which has absolutely nothing to do with the restructure. What the dead money means, is what would the cap hit be if Hawk was cut today. Before the restructure, the cap hit to cut him would have been 4.8mil, add the guaranteed and it goes to 7. The article makes it sound like they just hid money which isn't the case.

Hawk took a 28% pay cut plain and simple. And gets a guarantee for part because of his willingness to work with them.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#4 Posted : Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:35:22 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Posts: 2,278
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 247
Applause Received: 365

Hawk took a pay cut on his base salary in 2013,2014,2015, he still receives ALL of the GUARANTEED money from the original contract.

Basically he took a 1.3 mil. pay cut for the year 2013.

The cuts he took in 2014 and 2015 are probably MOOT(right Zero?), since The Packers will either cut him, trade him, or extend his contract after the 2013 season.

Cutting him is probably what will happen, if they do this after the 2013 season he will still count 3.2mil(the rest of his original signing bonus) against the 2014 cap.(dead money)

This is the business side of things, these contracts are all about THE GUARANTEED MONEY, the rest is just window dressing after the 1st couple of years.

Players don't have to restructure, looks like A.J. wanted at least 1 more year in Green Bay.


Edit: had $1300 not 1.3mil

Edited by user Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:37:46 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

“"The preparation week is where you make your hay,You have to win the week first. That’s where a lot of the wins and losses come. It’s how you approach the week leading up to the game."
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#5 Posted : Friday, March 22, 2013 4:00:44 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,290
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 77

JerseyAl wrote:
Our third article focuses on Jermichael Finley’s current contract and what its purpose served last offseason when each party agreed to it. Namely, why was it only a two-year deal, and why were the monetary details set as they were?
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / cheeseheads123

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Announcements / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

9h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

23h / Announcements / dfosterf

29-Jul / Random Babble / MontanaBob


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.