Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline play2win  
#1 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:20:47 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725

Both sides of the ball need them. I could easily see us taking 2 DEs, 1 NT, 1 LT, 1 C.

That leaves 3 picks to add RB, S, and LB. WR and TE can wait. Personally, I would love to see this happen this year, as the trenches look deep this draft, and that is where the battles are won and lost. I don't want us to lose anymore. I want us to win.

I'm thinking it would be great if we had guys like Mike Neal, Marshall Newhouse, CJ Wilson, Mike Daniels and ED'S fighting for jobs with a massive talent infusion. That is how we will become a better team.
Offline wpr  
#2 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:55:15 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,019
Applause Received: 1,460

It is going to depend on the board and who falls to them. I am going to guess that this is what they end up with.

DE, S, WR, RB, C, QB, NT, TE

(not in that order.) I won't be shocked if they grab a CB or LB because Uncle Teddy feels that is the BPA. I just don't want it to be in the first 3 rounds.

UserPostedImage

Offline yooperfan  
#3 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:59:48 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 600
Applause Received: 271

I just don't see Ted spending 5 picks on the trenches.
Perhaps 3 though.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 4/25/2013(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#4 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:03:38 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,019
Applause Received: 1,460

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
I just don't see Ted spending 5 picks on the trenches.
Perhaps 3 though.


yep. I originally went with 4 incl a Guard but dropped him for a QB.

UserPostedImage

Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#5 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:21:44 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 13
Applause Received: 371

I'm hoping for no more than 5 picks period. We don't have room for 8 rookies.

This is looking like a good year to trade UP. I keep hearing that teams all over are wanting to move back. Which would make the cost of moving up less. We might be able to improve quality of a pick rather cheap.

Otherwise, try to trade our 1st moving back, and bundling what we have to maximize the number of 2nds and 3rds. If we could come out with 2 2nds and 2 3 thirds plus one later round pick I would be happy. With the both 2nds being lineman (one each side) and the 3rds being maybe a MLB, WR and the late rounder could be anything but a punter or kicker.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 4/25/2013(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#6 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:36:47 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725

I hope like hell he pounds both lines. This is a good draft for that. The only kicker I see is we need an OLB, as insurance should Perry run into any trouble coming off of injury. They seem pretty set with S, if they want to roll those same guys out there. I trust McMillian will prove to be a better player in year two, and they kept Sean Richardson on the roster last year for a reason. He may prove better than any draft choices at the position this year... just a guess.

RB is another position that should to be addressed, as Green and Starks have proven unreliable. However, they may trust Benson to make a healthy run throughout the season this year, and they can probably add a UFA if need be. I'm certain they have that position well targeted with their options.

PackFanWithTwins, I like the idea of trading down in R1 then back into the R2/R3, in essence, doubling up in that section of the draft, as much as I don't want them to miss out on the best R1 talent they can get at 26. I'm kind of hoping we trade away our R1 for next year to load up this year.
Offline Wade  
#7 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:45:46 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 676
Applause Received: 694

Not going to happen.

Though DL OL DL OL DL/OL would be really cool with the first five picks.

Not going to happen. Ted refuses to do a draft that doesn't cause me to bitch throughout.


On the other hand, as I am without TV or the ability to stream at home now, perhaps he will. :)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#8 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:00:17 AM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 329
Applause Received: 443

1RB, 1FB, 1 C, 2 DT’s, 1 WR, 1TE and 1S

This is what I guessed when put together my 53 man roster, so I will stick with my choices.

The only change I would think about is dropping the FB and adding a QB.

Either way FB or QB will happen late in the draft.

Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#9 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:26:42 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 84
Applause Received: 149

I could see 3-4 easy, but not five. Still need LB, WR, TE, and RB.
Offline warhawk  
#10 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:47:58 AM(UTC)
warhawk

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 220


I could see OL and DL early because of the depth at those positions and maybe a C in the 3rd or 4th.

The risk is focusing on positions and letting really good players go by at other positions when team needs change every year.

I can't see drafting this many linemen in one draft being the way to go to improve those positions over the course of the next few years. It's forcing it. I know many want to see the OL and DL play improve....but...I don't see this getting that accomplished. It's too Sherman-like for me.

Draft the best player with the most talent that's available. They will find the field and make the team better.

"The train is leaving the station."
Offline Yerko  
#11 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:06:05 AM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL

Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 245

It is tough to gauge where a guy is going to go in this draft. Last night, I was watching Mayock's mock and he had Star Lotulelei sitting all the way to the 18th pick. Personally, if Lotulelei is sitting there THAT late in the first round, I'd hope the Packers trade up and grab him.

It would be worth it.

I think the Packers take 3-4 linemen. 2 defensive lineman and 1-2 offensive linemen (C,T).
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 4/25/2013(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#12 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:11:50 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 47
Applause Received: 963

Who knows. Maybe we will only spend 1 pick on a lineman and he will be a bust and some UDFA DL they pick up gets 8 sacks as a rookie. This shit is impossible to predict.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Zero2Cool on 4/25/2013(UTC), play2win on 4/25/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#13 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:30:10 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,622
Applause Received: 651

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
Who knows. Maybe we will only spend 1 pick on a lineman and he will be a bust and some UDFA DL they pick up gets 8 sacks as a rookie. This shit is impossible to predict.


lol and that type of shit just might even happen.

I think alot depends on how the board falls. Ted won't reach.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Dulak  
#14 Posted : Thursday, April 25, 2013 12:54:39 PM(UTC)
Dulak

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)

Applause Given: 154
Applause Received: 100

Originally Posted by: play2win Go to Quoted Post
Both sides of the ball need them. I could easily see us taking 2 DEs, 1 NT, 1 LT, 1 C.

That leaves 3 picks to add RB, S, and LB. WR and TE can wait. Personally, I would love to see this happen this year, as the trenches look deep this draft, and that is where the battles are won and lost. I don't want us to lose anymore. I want us to win.

I'm thinking it would be great if we had guys like Mike Neal, Marshall Newhouse, CJ Wilson, Mike Daniels and ED'S fighting for jobs with a massive talent infusion. That is how we will become a better team.


nah - well need at least 1 OLB - and I actually think we are a bit heavy on the Dline side and a bit light on the Oline (our guys are banged up).
I could see us pulling a rb, 2-3 OL 1 DL and 1 OLB and then 1 whatever
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / QCHuskerFan

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast