Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:16:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 141
LombardiAve said:
As OTAs are about to begin this month, here at LombardiAve we have decided it would be a good time to take a closer look at each position on the Green Bay Packers roster. Over the next few weeks we will break down each position and discuss which players are safe from being cut, which players [...]
Offline nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:53:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,417
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post


Looks like a pretty good site. Is it new?
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#3 Posted : Friday, May 17, 2013 3:59:42 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
You want two things from your backup(s) according to the Packer philosophy:

One obviously is insurance against the unthinkable. Nobody replaces Rodgers, but hopefully whoever can win - or at least not lose - a solid percentage of games if he is needed to play.

Two is like a cash crop on a farm - you hope you can have the guy rise to a level of being worth something significant in trade BEFORE he "spoils" - is eligible for free agency and you lose him with very little compensation to a team with money and need.

Harrell isn't quite ripe yet, but IMO there is still hope - like Hasselbeck, Flynn, and the others - another quality product from the folks at Packer QB Farm. Thus, I hope they can keep both him and Coleman one way or another this season.
Offline nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Friday, May 17, 2013 4:39:39 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,417
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
You want two things from your backup(s) according to the Packer philosophy:

One obviously is insurance against the unthinkable. Nobody replaces Rodgers, but hopefully whoever can win - or at least not lose - a solid percentage of games if he is needed to play.

Two is like a cash crop on a farm - you hope you can have the guy rise to a level of being worth something significant in trade BEFORE he "spoils" - is eligible for free agency and you lose him with very little compensation to a team with money and need.

Harrell isn't quite ripe yet, but IMO there is still hope - like Hasselbeck, Flynn, and the others - another quality product from the folks at Packer QB Farm. Thus, I hope they can keep both him and Coleman one way or another this season.


Harrell is a career backup.

We don't know what Coleman's ceiling is yet. With Mike's QB school, it could be high.
Offline greengold  
#5 Posted : Friday, May 17, 2013 5:12:51 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/11/2013(UTC)
Applause Given: 226
Applause Received: 257
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
you hope you can have the guy rise to a level of being worth something significant in trade BEFORE he "spoils" - is eligible for free agency and you lose him with very little compensation to a team with money and need.

Harrell isn't quite ripe yet, but IMO there is still hope ...Thus, I hope they can keep both him and Coleman one way or another this season.


I believe that window is closed on Mr. Harrell. This is the last year of his contract. He will be a RFA but since he was undrafted that doesn't help you much. If you really think he will be something special you would have to sign him to a long term deal this year before he hits free agency, then hope to trade him.

I tend to agree with the other poster, he is a career backup.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 5/18/2013(UTC)
Offline beast  
#6 Posted : Friday, May 17, 2013 6:17:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 564
Applause Received: 701
greengold said: Go to Quoted Post
I believe that window is closed on Mr. Harrell. This is the last year of his contract. He will be a RFA but since he was undrafted that doesn't help you much. If you really think he will be something special you would have to sign him to a long term deal this year before he hits free agency, then hope to trade him.

I tend to agree with the other poster, he is a career backup.


If he's an RFA then no big deal. If the Packers want him then he's probably stuck. Like shields (who was/is an RFA). Has Shields signed his deal yet or is he still an RFA? ... anyways no other team was willing to give up a 2nd round pick for Shields and sign him to a deal he would sign so he has resign with the Packers.

As for Harrell, I don't think he has the arm for the NFL. I know the back-up OL he has played with in preseason has been pretty bad, but even still I've seen nothing to say he's a for sure #2 guy or has any physical potential to grow...

Coleman on the other hand, he clearly has the raw physical tools to grow. The question about him is more can he get the mental side down. Which if he gets mentally close to Harrell then Harrell is gone. And I don't think Harrell can grow into something worth trading for.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 5/18/2013(UTC)
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#7 Posted : Friday, May 17, 2013 8:50:27 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
Regarding Harrell, didn't a lot of people say the same about Flynn - career backup/not strong arm? I tend to favor Coleman also - greater potential, however, it's not so much what use can we make of Harrell as what can we get for him in trade? It concerns me more that he will be an RFA, and hence little or no value in trade. That being the case, maybe we should just cut him in preseason and be done with it - and maybe concentrate on Brown as a #3.
Offline beast  
#8 Posted : Saturday, May 18, 2013 12:11:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 564
Applause Received: 701
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Regarding Harrell, didn't a lot of people say the same about Flynn - career backup/not strong arm?


Yes and so far those people are correct. Flynn hasn't been a starter yet. And the thing is Harrell hasn't even show a quarter of what Flynn showed... Flynn showed a little spark and potential every once in a while. Harrell hasn't shown much of anything.

texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
it's not so much what use can we make of Harrell as what can we get for him in trade?


huh? why would a team trade for Harrell? Harrell hasn't show enough to worth a team giving up a pick for him. And the upside hasn't look like it's there. I think teams would be more interested in drafted a 7th round rookie QB with more potential and coaching them up than Harrell.

texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
It concerns me more that he will be an RFA, and hence little or no value in trade. That being the case, maybe we should just cut him in preseason and be done with it - and maybe concentrate on Brown as a #3.


RFA is no big deal... 99% of the time if a team wants their RFA than they keep them. See Thompson with not letting Bush get away when he was an RFA and signed with the Titans. Ted Thompson matched it.

As far as Brown.... after the Packers drafted Coleman last year (becoming the 4th QB on the Packers roster at the time) Mike McCarthy said he's got into training camps with 4 or 5 QBs become and he doesn't prefer it because there isn't enough snaps to go around for everyone. And then the Packers cut the FA they picked up from the AFL.

So if they picked up Brown and are going with four this time, I take that as one of the two middle guys could be gone and Brown might be the new practice squad QB.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 5/19/2013(UTC)
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#9 Posted : Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:58:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
My point was, if Harrell signs with somebody else, it's doubtful the Packers get any compensation. Yeah, they could keep him, but I'm assuming after one more season of improvement for Coleman and maybe Brown, there's no way the Packers would match even a fairly low offer for Harrell.

I actually don't have near the low opinion of Harrell as a lot of people. I think he could step in and do an adequate job for the Packers or some other team, but I'd rather have Coleman holding the clipboard (do they even still do that?)
Offline nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Saturday, May 18, 2013 10:12:00 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,417
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
My point was, if Harrell signs with somebody else, it's doubtful the Packers get any compensation. Yeah, they could keep him, but I'm assuming after one more season of improvement for Coleman and maybe Brown, there's no way the Packers would match even a fairly low offer for Harrell.

I actually don't have near the low opinion of Harrell as a lot of people. I think he could step in and do an adequate job for the Packers or some other team, but I'd rather have Coleman holding the clipboard (do they even still do that?)


You guys don't get it.

Harrell is the long-term backup. Coleman is the one we develop and trade for a 2 or 3.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
GoPack1984 (3m) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (9m) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (13m) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (14m) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (31m) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (43m) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (2h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (2h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (4h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (10h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (11h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (12h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (12h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (12h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (12h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (12h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (13h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (13h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (18h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (18h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (19h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (23h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (23h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (23h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (23h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (23h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13m / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

7h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa


Packers Headlines