Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
10 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DoddPower  
#11 Posted : Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:57:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,417
Applause Received: 941
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Don't need to.


True, because what you said is so obviously a factoid.
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#12 Posted : Friday, June 7, 2013 12:04:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 141
Packers said:
GREEN BAY—It was one of the worst, maybe the worst, game of Dom Capers’ coaching life. Nobody does that to a Capers-coached defense, but the 49ers were doing it. They were hanging 579 yards on th...
Online nerdmann  
#13 Posted : Friday, June 7, 2013 1:14:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,416
Vic Ketchman? Really?

No credibility whatsoever. Or style, for that matter.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#14 Posted : Friday, June 7, 2013 7:54:02 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
i ran a correlation between winning % and TOP.


There isn't any. The graph looked like a shotgun pattern.


It is a complete myth. It only sounds logical. In reality, it has no effect.


Time of possession is not directly tied to points. If you hold the ball for 7 minutes and throw a pick 6, then hold the ball for 7 minutes and punt, to have it run back for a TD, you are up 14-0 on the clock and down 14-0 on the score board.

If you have long drawn out drives of 10 or more plays, there are more chances to screw up and give the ball away before you score.

If you have a quick strike offense, your opponent still has to score to keep up with you. If you score fast but every time you touch the ball, they have to do more than burn clock. They have to actually put up points.

It doesn't matter how long it takes you to score as long as you do.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 6/8/2013(UTC), mi_keys on 6/9/2013(UTC)
Online nerdmann  
#15 Posted : Friday, June 7, 2013 8:05:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,416
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
i ran a correlation between winning % and TOP.


There isn't any. The graph looked like a shotgun pattern.


It is a complete myth. It only sounds logical. In reality, it has no effect.


Time of possession is not directly tied to points. If you hold the ball for 7 minutes and throw a pick 6, then hold the ball for 7 minutes and punt, to have it run back for a TD, you are up 14-0 on the clock and down 14-0 on the score board.

If you have long drawn out drives of 10 or more plays, there are more chances to screw up and give the ball away before you score.

If you have a quick strike offense, your opponent still has to score to keep up with you. If you score fast but every time you touch the ball, they have to do more than burn clock. They have to actually put up points.

It doesn't matter how long it takes you to score as long as you do.


Not all teams run the WCO. They may not be concerned about ToP.

I think the biggest correlation in winning is having good players. We have that. I'm not worrred about successfully completing high percentage plays.

What I don't like is 3 and outs, which result from not connecting on low percentage plays. A "quick strike" offense is great. But those long passing plays are low percentage. Granted, there is some favoritism there based upon the ridiculous DPI rules.

I'm not saying we can't win using Mike's system. I just don't think it's time tested, or proven at all.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#16 Posted : Saturday, June 8, 2013 10:17:37 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Not all teams run the WCO. They may not be concerned about ToP.

I think the biggest correlation in winning is having good players. We have that. I'm not worrred about successfully completing high percentage plays.

What I don't like is 3 and outs, which result from not connecting on low percentage plays. A "quick strike" offense is great. But those long passing plays are low percentage. Granted, there is some favoritism there based upon the ridiculous DPI rules.

I'm not saying we can't win using Mike's system. I just don't think it's time tested, or proven at all.


Best offense in the league 2 years running.

In 5 years, Rodgers has the highest career rating, the highest single season rating and the second highest post season rating in the history of the NFL.

11-5, 10-6, 15-1 and 11-5.

I think the offense works.

The packers are pretty good at converting on 3rd down.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
steveishere on 6/9/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 6/9/2013(UTC)
Online nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Saturday, June 8, 2013 10:35:37 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,416
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Best offense in the league 2 years running.

In 5 years, Rodgers has the highest career rating, the highest single season rating and the second highest post season rating in the history of the NFL.

11-5, 10-6, 15-1 and 11-5.

I think the offense works.

The packers are pretty good at converting on 3rd down.


The Packers will be better at converting on third down this year, because they will not have to rely on Kuhn.

And I take it you're measuring the performance of the offense against statistics right? Because that is the main thing about which Mike and Aaron are concerned. So yeah, they have great stats.

Once again we got off to a shitty start by abandoning the running game and trying to sling it deep constantly.

Not saying it won't work either. But if it does, it's due more to Ted than Mike.
Offline steveishere  
#18 Posted : Sunday, June 9, 2013 2:16:17 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,755
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Not all teams run the WCO. They may not be concerned about ToP.

I think the biggest correlation in winning is having good players. We have that. I'm not worrred about successfully completing high percentage plays.

What I don't like is 3 and outs, which result from not connecting on low percentage plays. A "quick strike" offense is great. But those long passing plays are low percentage. Granted, there is some favoritism there based upon the ridiculous DPI rules.

I'm not saying we can't win using Mike's system. I just don't think it's time tested, or proven at all.


The last 7 Superbowl winning teams threw long passing plays at a similar or higher percentage than the Packers have the last couple of years. I'd say as far as recent history is concerned that's pretty proven.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#19 Posted : Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:49:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers will be better at converting on third down this year, because they will not have to rely on Kuhn.

And I take it you're measuring the performance of the offense against statistics right? Because that is the main thing about which Mike and Aaron are concerned. So yeah, they have great stats.

Once again we got off to a shitty start by abandoning the running game and trying to sling it deep constantly.

Not saying it won't work either. But if it does, it's due more to Ted than Mike.


11-5, 10-6, 15-1 and 11-5.

I think the offense works.

They got off to a shitty start because they lost Benson and Saine while Starks was on PUP. Green was not ready to come back from knee reconstruction yet because his HGH dealer was sold out to APs Doc.

Even then they were average in number of rushing attempts.

After Harris showed up, they were top 5 in rushing attempts.

The assertion that they don't like to run the ball is a myth.

The only thing they needed to have a better running game was any healthy backs. Which they didn't really have.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 6/9/2013(UTC)
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#20 Posted : Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:55:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
If having the highest passer rating differential means you have the best chance to win, you can bet your whiney ass that the teams that win the most are going to be concerned with that stat.

Put your effort into what gives you the best chance to win.

The stats themselves are not important. What they mean is.

There is an enormous difference. One that I think Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson understand. They are not concerned about putting up stats, they are concerned with doing the things that will increase the right stats.

Because if you do, your chances of winning go up.

It is completely different. If you think it is the same thing, you don't know what the stats mean.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 6/9/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
10 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6m) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (5h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (6h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (7h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (7h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (7h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (8h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (8h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (13h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (13h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (14h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (18h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (18h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (18h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (18h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (18h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (18h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (19h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (19h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (19h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (19h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (19h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (19h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (19h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (20h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (20h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
uffda udfa (20h) : Dallas play by play guy said we aren't best team.
uffda udfa (20h) : NBC is off the air down here. This is an OTA broadcast signal.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

2h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Around The NFL / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis


Packers Headlines