Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Saturday, June 15, 2013 8:48:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 143
LombardiAve said:
What were the Green Bay Packers thinking by issuing the number 5 to wide receiver Terrell Sinkfield? Don't they know what happened the last time they did that? Remember the flak that Don Majkowski — and the Packers — received when they issued the number to him back in 1987? It was significant and strong [...]
Offline beast  
#2 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:39:57 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 566
Applause Received: 703

Which roster numbers going to 90 in the offseason retired numbers are starting to become a small problem.

I figure one of these days the NFL is ether going to say numbers can't be retired any more and all numbers are in play.

Or the more likely that numbers can be twice as long as one guy is on offense and the other is on defense (like I've seen in training camps in the past) and people see in college football.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#3 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:06:12 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,500
Applause Received: 4,044
There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it. It serves more honor in the number being used than not. You see that number, it conjures memories ... think about it.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:20:25 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it. It serves more honor in the number being used than not. You see that number, it conjures memories ... think about it.


I tend to agree, this would be a good compromise. The problem, particularly with the Packers, is there are just SO MANY numbers that could and arguably should be retired - based on what they did for the team in their time. Until this or some other acceptable policy is adopted, they could go with something like the colleges do - duplicate numbers in camp and preseason, one O and one D.

Offline beast  
#5 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:33:54 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 566
Applause Received: 703
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
There shouldn't be ANY retired numbers. To honor the player, take it out of circulation for a decade and then re-enter it.


Great idea.
Offline mi_keys  
#6 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 3:42:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 351
Applause Received: 614
In Europe with soccer you don't really see retired numbers but certain numbers for certain teams hold special significance. Usually, those numbers are reserved for players who have established themselves and earned the right to carry on the tradition associated with that number. Granted, for the longest time, numbers were assigned to positions, not individual players (probably explains why it has evolved differently today where you don't see retired numbers).

Still, I think something like that could work. Where a player could establish themselves after few years and then, if they wanted, they could switch to that reserved number. For instance, I look at the number 36 and remember elite safety play, having grown up watching Leroy Butler and later Nick Collins hold that number for much of my lifetime. You could take that number and only give it to safeties (or maybe more broadly defensive backs) that have established themselves as great players. That way, you honor the player(s) that have established a great history with that number, but it is still available for use going forward.
Offline CaliforniaCheez  
#7 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 4:38:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 154
The issuance of the number is only temporary.

If he makes the team it will change

If he doesn't make the team the controversy is ended.

A WR cannot wear 21 or 36.

While 5 is controversial, wearing 80 might currently be more controversial.

For the first time in years there are no duplicate numbers on the large offseason roster.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 6/16/2013(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#8 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 5:09:51 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,633
Applause Received: 648
Doesn't matter Packers fans will remember the "Golden Boy" till the end of time.
Nobody will remember Sinkfield after August.
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Sunday, June 16, 2013 8:25:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,404
Applause Received: 1,419
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Doesn't matter Packers fans will remember the "Golden Boy" till the end of time.
Nobody will remember Sinkfield after August.


Kid has a chance. He's got Sam Shields measurables and iirc Edgar Bennett coaching him up.

There's gonna be competition there though, that's for sure.

It's just a camp number. Soon as players start getting cut, they'll change it.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (32m) : Favorite GM candidate... Wolf or Gutekunst?
uffda udfa (54m) : I'd rather sit them than play them too compromised.
uffda udfa (58m) : Yeah, Z. More pressure cooker talk and smoked turkeys.
Zero2Cool (58m) : If this were a regular-season game, Nelson, Adams and Allison probably would not play, MM says.
Smokey (1h) : Mason Crosby is ill, hope it's not the Flu.
Smokey (1h) : Great, can we move past that story and get back to the Atlanta game ?
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers exec Eliot Wolf has withdrawn his name for 49ers' GM job, as @TomPelissero reported. He didn't feel it was the right time.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : We'll just have to score TDs then.
Zero2Cool (3h) : That's what we know.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Crosby, Mason K Illness
Smokey (3h) : Is He ill or not ?
Smokey (3h) : Raiderpride asked, "Anyone know what Crosby's illness is?"
Zero2Cool (3h) : Davante Adams expected to play- KFFL
Porforis (4h) : Alright, my opinion on Jordy has changed. If he's medically cleared to play, play him.
hardrocker950 (6h) : By Sunday we won't have any WRs
Zero2Cool (6h) : Geronimo hamstring, Janis quad. BEAUTIFUL.
Smokey (6h) : Mason Crosby, is his health OK ?
Smokey (7h) : Hello
FLORIDA PACKER88 (7h) : Davis, G-Mo, and Janis will need to step up, but all three did score last time we played ATL!
FLORIDA PACKER88 (7h) : Does Janis become a playoff hero second year in a row? Looks we're gonna have to find out either way regardless. Thank God for a healthy Cob
Smokey (7h) : Is Mason Crosby's health OK ?
Smokey (8h) : What's in your Coffee ?
uffda udfa (19h) : Sit Davante if he has a bad ankle. We remember 2015.
uffda udfa (19h) : Davante is not going to practice until SAT at earliest.
uffda udfa (20h) : Davante and Jordy may be inactive at ATL.
Smokey (21h) : ROFL !!
Cheesey (21h) : The Packers SMOKED the COWBOYS!!!LOL!
Smokey (21h) : Ever Smoke a Turkey, it takes lots of rolling papers. LOL
Smokey (21h) : Thanks Cheesey. LOL
Cheesey (21h) : Smokey, it was chicken gizzards (and hearts)!
Cheesey (21h) : So let's just start by saying, I love you!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Great, Geronimo Allison is on the injury report.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Most irritating tweets/tweet starters: 1) This >>> 2) Yep, ...3) There it is.... 4) Not good 5) XX doing XX things 6) Because xxx
Zero2Cool (18-Jan) : Belichick when asked to discuss the importance of having the home crowd behind them: “I don’t know. Go ask Dallas and Kansas City.” …Oof.
Smokey (18-Jan) : BRAVO, ZERO !
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

44m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Around The NFL / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines