Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, August 26, 2013 1:05:15 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 102
CheeseheadTV said:
Mason Crosby counts $3.6 million in dead money against the salary cap over the next three seasons. That's a lot of money that could potentially go toward handing out contract extensions to other players.
Sponsor
Offline gotarace  
#2 Posted : Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48:16 PM(UTC)
gotarace

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/3/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 80
Applause Received: 40
3.6 million reasons to keep Crosby...this could be considered a bonehead move by the Packers front office. I never gave Crosby's guaranteed contract a thought...I never thought we would guarantee a kickers contract for that many years...
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, August 26, 2013 1:53:47 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,146
Applause Received: 772
Here's one good reason NOT to keep Crosby: He sucks.
Offline sschind  
#4 Posted : Monday, August 26, 2013 2:56:06 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 526
I may have it wrong but something about that article does not make sense.

When they say "dead money" I assume that means the amount of his signing bonus that accelerates when he is cut and it sounds like that is 1.8 million.

The article misses a few points. If they cut him they don't have to pay him his base salary of 2.4 million so they save that right off the top. Also, unless the rules have changed regarding signing bonus if they cut him they could defer half the prorated amount until next season. That means Crosby would have a cap hit of 900K this season and not 3.1 million. That is why teams usually made their veteran cuts after June 1st when the new year started so they could split the hit over two years.

Its not a matter of 1.8 million because they could easily save that over 3 years by the reduced salary of the new guy.

I don't see salary cap as an issue here at all and in fact I would say it would make more sense to cut him cap wise than to keep him, assuming you would get equal performance from a new kicker. The dead money you would have to count against the cap (even if the full 1.8 million counted and not just 900K like I think would) plus the new kicker salary would likely still be less than 3.1 million cap hit if you keep Crosby. The way I see it you would gain cap space.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
play2win on 8/26/2013(UTC), OlHoss1884 on 8/26/2013(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#5 Posted : Monday, August 26, 2013 4:49:55 PM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I may have it wrong but something about that article does not make sense.

When they say "dead money" I assume that means the amount of his signing bonus that accelerates when he is cut and it sounds like that is 1.8 million.

The article misses a few points. If they cut him they don't have to pay him his base salary of 2.4 million so they save that right off the top. Also, unless the rules have changed regarding signing bonus if they cut him they could defer half the prorated amount until next season. That means Crosby would have a cap hit of 900K this season and not 3.1 million. That is why teams usually made their veteran cuts after June 1st when the new year started so they could split the hit over two years.

Its not a matter of 1.8 million because they could easily save that over 3 years by the reduced salary of the new guy.

I don't see salary cap as an issue here at all and in fact I would say it would make more sense to cut him cap wise than to keep him, assuming you would get equal performance from a new kicker. The dead money you would have to count against the cap (even if the full 1.8 million counted and not just 900K like I think would) plus the new kicker salary would likely still be less than 3.1 million cap hit if you keep Crosby. The way I see it you would gain cap space.


sschind, comin' through with the goods! Well done! I could not agree more. Huge savings over those 3 years by releasing him, and, maybe some game winning field goals to boot!
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter