You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages<123
Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#31 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:54:16 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,523
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,106
Applause Received: 472

We've still got Bostick.

Although I guess they don't think he's ready yet.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Online wpr  
#32 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:58:16 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,873
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,405
Applause Received: 1,194

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
Green Bay football is reality football not fantasy football.
The reality is Ted Thompson is General Manager of the Packers.
Why waste your time fantasizing about these trades.
Not going to happen folks!


yoop it looks like some guys enjoy watching a pole dancer for 2 hours then go home and taking an ice cold shower. Shrug
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/11/2013(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#33 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:13:40 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,971
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 570
Applause Received: 1,190

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
We've still got Bostick.

Although I guess they don't think he's ready yet.


They should give Bostick some playing time, cause the other guys aren't doing jack. I've watched Taylor and Quarless miss gimme balls and of course Finley always has his moments. Our offense required production from the TE position.
UserPostedImage
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#34 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:51:40 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 829
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL

Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 173

We don't need to trade for anybody. We got depth at every position except Saftey. Saftey I would trade for. But the Packers never will.
Offline sschind  
#35 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:04:20 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 756
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 312

Originally Posted by: beast Go to Quoted Post
You make that sound like a bad thing... if a player is making plays then they should be getting the ball. And you can have more than one TE on the field at a time.



Because they can't catch the ball... and not making plays when they get their chances. Lets be honest, Gonzales and Finley both would.



If they are throwing the ball to Gonzo a lot then Finley will become like the rest of our guys. Mike McCarthy does not run an offense like Bill B. did with Hernandez and Gronkowski. If we had Finley and Gonzales one of them would be wasted. Frankly I would rather have the draft pick than a guy who would be done after this year (most likely.) Especially if that guy won't have much of an impact which I don't think he would.
I fully respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline beast  
#36 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:00:38 AM(UTC)
beast

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,518
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 119
Applause Received: 211

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
No different than bringing in a legit #4 WR


You're right on the money, it'd be nice to be able to play Gonzo, Finley, Nelson and Cobb right now with Jones being out and Ross cut.

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
If we had Finley and Gonzales one of them would be wasted.


Sounds like you're saying Mike McCarthy doesn't know how to use two good TEs.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
They should give Bostick some playing time, cause the other guys aren't doing jack.


They should have him practicing at WR because that's what he is. A huge, slow WR (which is fast for a TE). And he could help fill in for Jones if he's injury for a while.
America's team... of the people, by the people, for the people
UserPostedImage
~ made by pack93z
Offline DoddPower  
#37 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:23:39 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,458
Applause Received: 343

I know Cleveland isn't trading him, but Gordon would look especially good in Green and Gold at this point.
Offline beast  
#38 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:40:33 PM(UTC)
beast

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,518
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 119
Applause Received: 211

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
I know Cleveland isn't trading him, but Gordon would look especially good in Green and Gold at this point.


I strongly doubt the Browns would be willing to trade Gordon.


Giants seem to be listening to offers for WR Hakeem Nicks, who they haven't been able to work out a long term deal with (at least not yet).


Jags seem to be listening to all offers on any of their players, sounds like they're trying to trade RB Jones-Drew ("at the right price") and they have seem to have a love/hate relationship with WR Justin Blackmon. Love his talent but sounds like they might be having some problems with him off the field. I doubt they'd be willing to trade him, because they seem to love his potential, but maybe they could ask about him.
America's team... of the people, by the people, for the people
UserPostedImage
~ made by pack93z
Offline nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:43:44 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,523
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,106
Applause Received: 472

Brandon Lloyd?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#40 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 1:44:22 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,458
Applause Received: 343

Originally Posted by: beast Go to Quoted Post
I strongly doubt the Browns would be willing to trade Gordon.


Giants seem to be listening to offers for WR Hakeem Nicks, who they haven't been able to work out a long term deal with (at least not yet).


Jags seem to be listening to all offers on any of their players, sounds like they're trying to trade RB Jones-Drew ("at the right price") and they have seem to have a love/hate relationship with WR Justin Blackmon. Love his talent but sounds like they might be having some problems with him off the field. I doubt they'd be willing to trade him, because they seem to love his potential, but maybe they could ask about him.


Yeah, I'm just saying it would be nice! Justin Blackmon is a beast, I can't imagine him going anywhere. He could very likely be the Packers best WR if he was on this team. Nicks is good, but he's pretty disappointing a lot of time, too. But still, he'd obviously be better Boykin et al.

Hopefully James Jones can come back soon. If so, the Packers still have weapons, especially if they can keep improving their run game. I wouldn't expect any big moves if Jones comes back. If both are done for the season, it's going to be a long rest of the season, probably.

Offline sschind  
#41 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:09:10 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 756
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 312

Blackmon or Gordon would be awesome in Green Bay but I highly doubt either of them will be going anywhere. I know the Jags and Browns front office haven't been stellar but I doubt even they would be stupid enough to trade away their best playmakers.

If we get any Cleveland WR maybe we can trade for Charles Johnson.
I fully respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline nerdmann  
#42 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:16:36 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,523
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,106
Applause Received: 472

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
Blackmon or Gordon would be awesome in Green Bay but I highly doubt either of them will be going anywhere. I know the Jags and Browns front office haven't been stellar but I doubt even they would be stupid enough to trade away their best playmakers.

If we get any Cleveland WR maybe we can trade for Charles Johnson.


Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#43 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:18:40 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,458
Applause Received: 343

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.


They specifically said they aren't trading Josh Gordon, and considering he's putting up big numbers every week, I don't doubt them. Now, I'm sure they would for the right price, but it would probably take a first for it to happen. They spent a high 2nd round pick on him, anyway, so it really wouldn't make any sense for them to trade him, considering he's so young.
Offline sschind  
#44 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 7:40:35 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 756
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 312

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Cleveland is rebuilding. They traded away Trent Richardson.


Richardson was not the player that Gordon is. Yeah they are rebuilding but I doubt they would want to start totally from scratch. Gordon is their biggest playmaker on offense by far. Without Richardson the Browns need at least two pieces to their offensive puzzle (QB and RB) they would be stupid to trade Gordon and have to find a third. Espescially when they still need a legit #2 WR.

I'm not saying they won't do it, just that they would be stupid if they did.

I fully respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/14/2013(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.245 seconds.