You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Roddyboy  
#16 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 11:19:04 AM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 156
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Quote:

WSJ: Do you guys know what you're doing?

MIKE McCARTHY: What kind of question is that?


Sometimes these people just make me sick. I can't wait for Mike McCarthy to snap one day and choke a bitch. [\quote]


Maybe he can start with you.

Or maybe himself....

Quote:


MM:
From my chair, that's all that's ever mattered. I wasn't the pretty girl when I was hired, so that was an experience we were able to overcome.


Can anyone photoshop McCarthy as the "prettiest girl".

That would be funny. Or maybe just find a current picture of his daughter!

:brilsmurf:
blank
Offline minnypacker  
#17 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 12:35:38 PM(UTC)
minnypacker

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 151
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)


What are you talking about?
blank
Offline Since69  
#18 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 12:53:59 PM(UTC)
Since69

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,133
Joined: 11/2/2006(UTC)

Applause Given: 82
Applause Received: 81

Jason Wilde is a madman. Great interview.

I love the fact that he's asking questions like the average fan would. He's obviously not afraid of making enemies.
UserPostedImage
Offline Greg C.  
#19 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 1:02:05 PM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,591
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan

Applause Received: 48

I thought it was significant that McCarthy finally backed off from saying that he's going to emphasize the run. It's about time. These days, the NFL is mostly a passing league. Check out this article by Michael Lombardi. Scan down to his second point:

http://sportsillustrated...anklyfootball/index.html
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#20 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 1:10:14 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
I thought it was significant that McCarthy finally backed off from saying that he's going to emphasize the run. It's about time. These days, the NFL is mostly a passing league. Check out this article by Michael Lombardi. Scan down to his second point:

http://sportsillustrated...anklyfootball/index.html


The thing is, they should have figured this out in the 80s. The Niners won 5 SBs, 4 in the 80s and 1 in the 90s, by passing. The lone exception for a dominant team that mostly ran were the Cows, but their passing game was pretty dang good too when it needed to be.

You need a QB that completes passes and doesn't turn the ball over.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline Pack93z  
#21 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 1:19:49 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

U.S. Minor Islands
Posts: 12,605
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 937

Before we get to far down this "abandon" the running game theme.. you have to have some type of a running game to win in the playoffs.. I could care less if you pass 75% of the time, you have to have a threat on the ground to keep the D balanced. There have been cases where a team has defied that long and tested theory.. but it holds true a greater percentage of the time.

The 49ers of the 80's had Craig and Rathman..

The small percentage of the time the backs touch the ball, they have to produce positive effective gains.. otherwise, no matter how creative you are in the schemes of the passing game.. an aggressive defensive front and a decent game plan in the secondary will catch up with you sooner or later.
The wolves will never lose sleep over the feelings of the sheep.

UserPostedImage
Offline Greg C.  
#22 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 1:33:30 PM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,591
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan

Applause Received: 48

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Before we get to far down this "abandon" the running game theme.. you have to have some type of a running game to win in the playoffs.. I could care less if you pass 75% of the time, you have to have a threat on the ground to keep the D balanced. There have been cases where a team has defied that long and tested theory.. but it holds true a greater percentage of the time.

The 49ers of the 80's had Craig and Rathman..

The small percentage of the time the backs touch the ball, they have to produce positive effective gains.. otherwise, no matter how creative you are in the schemes of the passing game.. an aggressive defensive front and a decent game plan in the secondary will catch up with you sooner or later.


Holy overreaction, Batman! Who said anything about abandoning the running game? I was just pointing out that nowadays most teams pass more than they run. But both are still very important.
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 1:42:31 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Agreed with Greg C. Just because I said the passing game was more important doesn't mean you can have Joe Fumble as your RB.

I think Mike McCarthy earlier this year mentioned the passing % of the top tier teams and I think of the top 5 last year, I think four of them were at or near 70% pass. I think the Giants had the lowest % of passing of the top 5 (Packers, Cows, Pats, Colts, and the Giants).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline Pack93z  
#24 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 2:20:57 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

U.S. Minor Islands
Posts: 12,605
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 937

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post

Holy overreaction, Batman! Who said anything about abandoning the running game? I was just pointing out that nowadays most teams pass more than they run. But both are still very important.


LOL.. I apparently didn't phrase it well enough or make my point clear, what I was trying to get at is that I agree that it is less important to run 45 or 50 % of the time, but in the percentage that you are going to run it needs to be consistent and effective.

In other words, I think the pass to run ratio is an over rated stat.. I personally am more concerned about how consistent and effective it is than just running it to balance the numbers for the talking heads and those that print the stat a 1000 times a week.

That is all.. nothing more. Sorry for the lack of explaining myself clearly the first time through..
The wolves will never lose sleep over the feelings of the sheep.

UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#25 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 2:34:26 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

In the future, you may even see a football team that uses RBs mostly for screens, short passes, and pass protection with your top RB getting a whopping 700 yards rushing and still the O can't be stopped.

Like take the Pats in '07 for instance. Best O ever. Top RB gets 865 yards rushing, but who was really more important, Maroney or K Faulk?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline Pack93z  
#26 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 2:43:20 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

U.S. Minor Islands
Posts: 12,605
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 937

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post

Like take the Pats in '07 for instance. Best O ever. Top RB gets 865 yards rushing, but who was really more important, Maroney or K Faulk?


That is my point though.. they ran into a team with an aggressive front on defense that wasn't afraid to pin there ears back and all out rush the QB every snap. I could care less if you run it 10 % of the time.. you have to have that element of effectiveness to the ground game to win it all in this league.

In your example, that was a total different team with Maroney healthy verse not.. he brought a level of threat to the ground game where others just were another guy in the backfield.

But I agree.. the 3 yards and a cloud of dust days are out of cycle in the NFL right now.. until the defenses catch up or the league takes away some of the rules to slow up the passing game that assist offenses right now.
The wolves will never lose sleep over the feelings of the sheep.

UserPostedImage
Offline DarkaneRules  
#27 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 2:43:54 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,511
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 133
Applause Received: 199

Play action passing will always be very important in the NFL. The running game has to be respected for that to work.
Offline zombieslayer  
#28 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 3:04:23 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Ah ha. Here's what I was looking for.

Let's take the 49ers 5 SB teams.

81 - win the SB with Ricky Patton (half of you saying "who?") rushing for a whopping 543 yards. Well, I guess they did have a rushing threat. Earl Cooper added another 330.

84 - Niners are a very balanced team with Wendell Tyler rushing for 1200+ yards and a young Roger Craig adding another 500+.

88 - Roger Craig has 1500+ yards.

89 - Craig has 1054.

94 - Ricky Watters leads the Niners with 877 yards.

So...
In of the Niners 5 SB wins, twice, they don't even have a 1000+ yard RB, which we all know isn't really that hard to do in a 16 game season (more than half the NFL has a 1000+ rusher on an average year in the 00s).

Sure, the threat of being able to pound the rock is nice, but what really beat the Pats in '07 was better coaching, not the running game. Watch the game again. Coughlin outsmarted Belichick. It was like a chess match where someone knocks off the champion.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline warhawk  
#29 Posted : Monday, September 8, 2008 6:51:36 PM(UTC)
warhawk

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,406
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 164

I believe one reason the trend is up in emphasizing the pass is because the rules of today's NFL keeping DB's hands off of receivers is a point OC's HAVE GOT TO EXPLOIT.

Ever since that one SB (sorry, can't remember which one) where the DB's mugged the receivers the whole game and completely shut down the other teams offense and the league rules changed this has been the case. The league WANTS more offense. It sells tickets. The no-touch after five rule provides that.

If the league was letting OL get more jersey on run plays and letting corners beat up the WR's the opposite would be true and teams would be running the hell out of the ball.

The other dynamic today that challenges run offenses is the speed of todays defenders. These LB's running 4.4's and DE's running 4'8's changes the complexion of the game. Now it's all about seeing the field and cutting back. Getting fast "D"'s to overreact is where you find almost all the big runs in today's game. Straight up holes don't stay holes long anymore.
"The train is leaving the station."
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.382 seconds.