Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline RaiderPride  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 2:43:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 270
Applause Received: 333
If we want to compare the two let's do it right.

Compare Brett's first two starts in the N.F.L to Chico's first two starts in the N.F.L.

Everything else is folly.

The whole world knows what Brett has done, but no one knows what Chico will do in the future. Right now... The only comparison as far as "Stats" is Chico and Brett, head to head, in their first two starts,

Oh.... I Reckon Chico is doing just fine.
Offline TheEngineer  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:03:44 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
If we want to compare the two let's do it right.

Compare Brett's first two starts in the N.F.L to Chico's first two starts in the N.F.L.

Everything else is folly.

The whole world knows what Brett has done, but no one knows what Chico will do in the future. Right now... The only comparison as far as "Stats" is Chico and Brett, head to head, in their first two starts,

Oh.... I Reckon Chico is doing just fine.


I don't know. Even comparing their first two games is not particularly useful as the debate is generally due to the trade of Brett Favre for starting Rodgers, and hence the "what can you do for me now?" attitude.

And even if this wasn't an issue, the league is far different now than 1992, as well as the coaching and the other players. In my opinion a fairer comparison would be the relative performance of Rodgers and Favre vs the league average, either now or first 2 starts.
Offline Cheesey  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:58:23 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 799
Applause Received: 931
" said: Go to Quoted Post
If we want to compare the two let's do it right.

Compare Brett's first two starts in the N.F.L to Chico's first two starts in the N.F.L.

Everything else is folly.

The whole world knows what Brett has done, but no one knows what Chico will do in the future. Right now... The only comparison as far as "Stats" is Chico and Brett, head to head, in their first two starts,

Oh.... I Reckon Chico is doing just fine.

Even thats not fair. Favre was thrown into the fire, while Rodgers has had 3 years to learn the offense.
But i don't care either way........I love Favre and Rodgers. Favre was fun to watch, and helped to take us back to being PROUD of the Packers. So far, Rodgers has been great, and it looks like we might just get back to the top of the hill again.
I'm THRILLED about the Packers possibilities this year and beyond!
Online wpr  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:22:24 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,965
Applause Received: 2,028
I would actually prefer NOT to compare the two at all. No need.
Loved Brett for what he once was to GREN BAY. Love the idea that he could bring them a 2nd round pick.
Love Aaron for what he now does for GB.
Nothing else really matters.
No use debating if Brett would have done a better job than Aaron in GB in 2008. It ain't going to happpen so it just doesn't matter.
Offline Cheesey  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:28:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 799
Applause Received: 931
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I would actually prefer NOT to compare the two at all. No need.
Loved Brett for what he once was to GREN BAY. Love the idea that he could bring them a 2nd round pick.
Love Aaron for what he now does for GB.
Nothing else really matters.
No use debating if Brett would have done a better job than Aaron in GB in 2008. It ain't going to happpen so it just doesn't matter.

I agree WPR.
Rodgers is "our guy" now, so you can compare all you want, it doesn't matter. But that won't stop people or the media from doing it.
Maybe if Favre had still been here we would be 0-2 right now. It's ALL just "what if's" anyway, as there's no way to PROVE any of it.
I myself want to keep the memories packed away, and concentrate on what IS, not what was or what it might have been.
Offline CaliforniaCheez  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:40:18 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 154
You don't have to be a Favre fan or a Rodgers fan to the exclusion of the other.

You can like them both.

Anyone complementing one is not insulting the other. Don't take anyone to task for complementing a performance.

Look how many teams can't find one adequate QB!!


Realize also that as Rodgers continues to play he is gaining experience and learning from his mistakes. He'll look better when the best 5 O-linemen are playing.

The times were good with Brett. It is okay to say you enjoyed him as a player.

A win against the Cowboys will calm a lot of peoples confused feelings.
Offline Cheesey  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:12:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 799
Applause Received: 931
" said: Go to Quoted Post
You don't have to be a Favre fan or a Rodgers fan to the exclusion of the other.

You can like them both.

Anyone complementing one is not insulting the other. Don't take anyone to task for complementing a performance.

Look how many teams can't find one adequate QB!!


Realize also that as Rodgers continues to play he is gaining experience and learning from his mistakes. He'll look better when the best 5 O-linemen are playing.

The times were good with Brett. It is okay to say you enjoyed him as a player.

A win against the Cowboys will calm a lot of peoples confused feelings.

I know, and agree Cali.
But some don't seem capable of that.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : Zeke Elliott tired of domestic violence investigation. NFL moving forward now.
Smokey (7h) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (7h) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (7h) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (7h) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (7h) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (10h) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (10h) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (10h) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (10h) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (10h) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (11h) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (12h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (13h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (15h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (20h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (21h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (22h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (23h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (23h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (23h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (23h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

10h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines