Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:56:42 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,632
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,834
Applause Received: 1,991

I doubt this would ever work, but I was sitting here and my mind wondered. Thought I'd share my ADD benefits with ya.


Say the team that wins the Super Bowl is subject to losing any one player to the team with the worst record and in turn would get their overall #1 pick.


So, last year the Giants would have lost a player to the Dolphins. Probably Eli Manning and would have gotten the overall first pick in the draft from the Dolphins in return. The Dolphins would choose the player or elect not to choose a player an use the 1st overall draft pick.


I think that would level the playing field more. Not that its not really level already. But I thought it was interesting, and like I said, really unlikely to ever be considered.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Sponsor
Offline Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:32:13 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,750
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 380
Applause Received: 1,020

I guess I don't see the complete parity in that scheme.. yes it would allow the worst team to cherry pick a player off the champs.. but they are champs for a reason.

They probably draft pretty well.. so giving them a number one pick in the draft and the last pick of the 1st round will just let them constantly reload.

It would however allow the struggling team rights to probably a franchise QB and the revenue hike too boot... until their depleted offensive line got said QB killed. :lol:

But I like the outside the box thinking.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error



Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / StarrMax1

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packman82

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

16h / Random Babble / wpr

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Jul / Around The NFL / Dexter_Sinister

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Jul / Random Babble / Pack93z

23-Jul / Random Babble / DakotaT

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.