Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Rockmolder  
#1 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 2:30:08 PM(UTC)
Fentress: Anger of some Green Bay fans toward Brett Favre misguided

By Aaron Fentress, The Oregonian

Quote:
A Green Bay fan burns a Brett Favre No. 4 Packers jersey. Another puts a jersey on a doormat. Others act even more childish toward their former hero.

[img_r]http://media.oregonlive.com/nfl/photo/jerseyburnjpg-e111d465a53cc98f_large.jpg[/img_r]
But the disdain is misguided. Wheres the disgust towards Packers management?

Green Bay fans live in denial. They are hanging on to some delusional, invented belief that Favre owed it to them to never play for the hated Minnesota Vikings, even when their team no longer wanted him.

Huh?

Green Bay fans no doubt love their franchise more than they do any one single player, even Favre. But the fact that many hold a grudge against Favre for playing for Minnesota, which defeated the Packers 30-23 on Monday night, seems preposterous.

It wasnt Favre's decision to ultimately end up in Minnesota over Green Bay. He sought to wear green and gold again. If anything, Packers fans should be upset with general manager Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy. They, more than anyone else, are responsible for Mondays debacle.

Yes, Aaron Rodgers is a fine quarterback, good enough to maybe one day lead the Packers to the Super Bowl. But Favre is Favre. And the same passion that causes Packers fans to destroy No. 4 jerseys should have led them in 2008 to demand that the Packers bring back Favre at all costs prior to the 2008 season.

Sure, Favre "retired" and then unretired over and over. And yes, he threw that horrid interception against the Giants in the NFC championship game. But Favres only crime is being indecisive about giving up something he loves. In the end, isnt that the type of competitor youd want leading your team?

favrerodgers.JPGAP Photo/Morry GashMinnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre (4) and Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers meet after the Vikings beat the Packers 30-23 on Monday night. Favre proved last year with the New York Jets that he could still play until an injury slowed him down late in the season. And look at him now. Hes got the Vikings at 4-0 with eight touchdown passes and one interception on the season.

Monday he completed 24 of 31 passes for 271 yards and three touchdowns with no interceptions, a performance that included several vintage, breathtaking throws.

None of this should be shocking. He had a MVP-caliber season in 2007 with Green Bay. And a team should never tell a MVP-caliber quarterback get away under any circumstances.

What does Green Bay have to show for its troubles? An 8-12 record over the last two seasons. Favre is 13-7, 12-3 when healthy. Granted, Rodgers has not been the problem in Green Bay. It would be unfair to lay the Packers demise at his feet.

But Favre has proven in the past that he can lead his team to victories when the defense is suspect. Rodgers has not.

Rodgers put up 384 yards on Monday. But he was sacked eight times. Some of those were his fault. Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?

Thompsons move not to bring back Favre was a power play. It had little to do with Rodgers development. Thompson and McCarthy wanted to move forward without the legend of Favre hanging over their heads. Understandable. But regrettable.

On Monday, Favre became the only NFL player to have won against all 32 NFL teams. That distinction could have been avoided.

But dont blame the man who has given Green Bay fans countless thrills. Blame those whose names youll barely remember a decade from now.
Rockmolder  
#2 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 2:31:27 PM(UTC)
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?
mi_keys  
#3 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 2:40:48 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?


Yep, with that line the writer proved he's about as delusional and psychotic as the fans that are burning their old Favre jerseys.
MassPackersFan  
#4 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 2:58:27 PM(UTC)
Quote:
They are hanging on to some delusional, invented belief that Favre owed it to them to never play for the hated Minnesota Vikings, even when their team no longer wanted him.


Dear God, why do people keep passing this off as THE story of what happened between GB and Favre? The retirement/unretirement thing was an absolute joke, and Favre received cracks about it from every media direction. Now it was Green Bay who was guilty of dumping him? Ha.
Cheesey  
#5 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 5:23:26 PM(UTC)
Obviously the guy that wrote that crap is the type to not bother with FACTS. Just another one of those "Favre is GOD" people.
I love Favre for what he did in his time here. But HE chose to leave, and the Packers let him leave.
I STILL think Favre wanted out, and wanted to make the Packers look bad. I think he dislikes TT, and wanted him to take the fall. He wanted to look "squeaky clean" to the fans.
But some of us actually THINK for ourselves.
So he's a Viking now. He's on the "enemy" team. So i won't cheer for him as long as he is on a different team. Why? I'm a PACKER fan. I was LONG before BF came here, and will be till i die.
zombieslayer  
#6 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 6:05:21 PM(UTC)
Cheesey - I completey appreciate your viewpoint and understand it's a majority here, but I'll always cheer for former Packers. Unless of course they're playing us.

For example, there's talk about trading Kampy. No, of course it won't happen. But let's just say it does. Whatever team he goes on I'll hope he gets 20 sacks a year. Except I hope he gets a big fat zero tackles when playing us.

Just like if Woody left. I hope he'd play 3 more years and gets 10+ INTs a year and makes the Hall of Fame, but Driver/Jennings burn him for a TD a piece when we play his team.

I don't understand how anyone can hate a former Packer.

Also, as far as I'm concerned, MN isn't the enemy. The Cows and the Broncos are. They're the ones who kept us from getting more SB rings in the 90s, when we were in the position to do it. I'd love a rematch of '97. That SB left such a bad taste in my mouth and I have NEVER recovered from it.
Rockmolder  
#7 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 6:35:15 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?


Yep, with that line the writer proved he's about as delusional and psychotic as the fans that are burning their old Favre jerseys.


I agree. There are two extremes here and those people are the ones getting all the media attention, it seems, making it look like at least half the fanbase is made up out of utterly retarded people.
Formo  
#8 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 6:59:54 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?


Yep, with that line the writer proved he's about as delusional and psychotic as the fans that are burning their old Favre jerseys.


I agree. There are two extremes here and those people are the ones getting all the media attention, it seems, making it look like at least half the fanbase is made up out of utterly retarded people.


Well... If it looks like a fish and smells like a fish... :thumbleft:
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#9 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 7:19:47 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?


Yep, with that line the writer proved he's about as delusional and psychotic as the fans that are burning their old Favre jerseys.


I agree. There are two extremes here and those people are the ones getting all the media attention, it seems, making it look like at least half the fanbase is made up out of utterly retarded people.


Well... If it looks like a fish and smells like a fish... :thumbleft:


Just admit the movie Fargo took place in your state, don't ya know! :icon_smile:
Cheesey  
#10 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 8:00:50 PM(UTC)
Zombie......I don't "hate" Favre.
But i just won't cheer for him when he's on the Vikings. Anymore then i did for Longwell or Sharper when they were there. Does that mean i hate them? Nope. They just arn't a part of "my" team anymore, so my loyalty stays in Green Bay. Doesn't mean i hate ANY of them.
There are alot of people that feel the same as i do, and get thrown in the "hate" pile because we won't cheer for Favre while he is in that ugly purple.
zombieslayer  
#11 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 8:22:57 PM(UTC)
Cheesey - Nah. It's all good. Like I said, I understand your viewpoint. We just differ. I always root for former Packers, and yes, that includes Longwell and Sharper but in my lifetime, it especially included Lofton, Favre, and Ahman Green.
Formo  
#12 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 10:13:43 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just shows in what kind of reality some appear to life.

I especially like this one.

Quote:
Some can be blamed on a poor and battered offensive line. But does anyone truly believe that if the two quarterbacks switched teams on Monday that Green Bay would not have won?


Yep, with that line the writer proved he's about as delusional and psychotic as the fans that are burning their old Favre jerseys.


I agree. There are two extremes here and those people are the ones getting all the media attention, it seems, making it look like at least half the fanbase is made up out of utterly retarded people.


Well... If it looks like a fish and smells like a fish... :thumbleft:


Just admit the movie Fargo took place in your state, don't ya know! :icon_smile:


Ya suure! Not a fan of that movie, eh? That's ok, either am I, don't ya know.
PackFanWithTwins  
#13 Posted : Friday, October 16, 2009 11:50:08 PM(UTC)
Is there really any difference in burning a Favre jersey because somebody is unhappy with him, or burning an american flag because somebody is unhappy with the government. Or a Packer flag.

Freedom of expression extends to being a fan. I would never do it myself, but not going to crucify others. Many believe Brett wanted and still does to stick it to Ted and the Franchise. So they have the Right to be upset with him and show it through a display.
dd80forever  
#14 Posted : Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:16:58 AM(UTC)
Great article, and it's sad that it is not appreciated and cannot be viewed as an accurate description of what happened.

You think this guy is delusional......sorry folks.......you are delusional and blinded by your green and gold glasses.

It's just like when ESPN had the poll of who was going to win the MINN VS. GB game and 49 states voted Minn. The 1 state that didn't.......Wisconsin.

You guys think you are right in all this while the majority of people outside of Wisconsin see it for what it is. Brett is mopping up the floor with Ted Thompson and making him look like a complete idiot. Sorry, you lose Ted, take your ball and your 4,956,987 gazillion dollars of cap space and go home. Actually you can take Justin Harrell with you as a token of appreciation for your service with the Packers.
PackFanWithTwins  
#15 Posted : Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:29:28 AM(UTC)
Delusional? Those who think what Brett does for another team really matters for Ted are the ones delusional. If anything, Brett beating GB only validates Ted's desire to keep him from playing their. What is going to make or break Ted is how Rodgers plays. How this team does with Aaron. Now how another team does with Brett.

All Ted needs to do is get us winning. Rodgers takes us to a SB while he plays in GB and Ted is by far proven correct no matter what Brett does. Unless some fool thinks Brett would be playing for us for the next 10 years.
dd80forever  
#16 Posted : Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:46:55 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Delusional? Those who think what Brett does for another team really matters for Ted are the ones delusional. If anything, Brett beating GB only validates Ted's desire to keep him from playing their. What is going to make or break Ted is how Rodgers plays. How this team does with Aaron. Now how another team does with Brett.

All Ted needs to do is get us winning. Rodgers takes us to a SB while he plays in GB and Ted is by far proven correct no matter what Brett does. Unless some fool thinks Brett would be playing for us for the next 10 years.



Yep thats all he has to do.......exactly when is this going to happen however?
Cheesey  
#17 Posted : Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:14:11 PM(UTC)
Who really knows DD80?
Anymore then YOU "know" if BF will lead the Queens to the SB this year.
Unless you are some kind of fortune teller, you can throw out any comments and no one can prove you wrong, right? Of course you also can't prove that you are right.
As far as the article "being accurate", you only say that cause the guy that wrote it agrees with you. He of course has no more "facts" about what happened then you do.
Have you read any of the articles that don't paint Favre as such a saint in all this? There were PLENTY of them written. I bet you didn't read those and say that they were accurate, did you? But you expect everyone that doesn't agree with you to take some guy who has NO more facts in what he wrote to be taken as gospel truth.
Again, do you just write off any opinion that says Favre is also at fault for what happened, and should ALSO take at least half of the blame?
dd80forever  
#18 Posted : Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:39:27 PM(UTC)
What "fact" does this author not see?
Gravedigga  
#19 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:05:23 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Unless some fool thinks Brett would be playing for us for the next 10 years.


I will play the part. Favre is on pace for his best year ever, at 40 years of age.

On pace for over 105 rating, 32td's, 5 int's, 70% completions. If healthy, hell, 2, 3 more years isnt out of the question.
PackFanWithTwins  
#20 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:09:53 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Unless some fool thinks Brett would be playing for us for the next 10 years.


I will play the part. Favre is on pace for his best year ever, at 40 years of age.

On pace for over 105 rating, 32td's, 5 int's, 70% completions. If healthy, hell, 2, 3 more years isnt out of the question.


Isn't hindsight Great. How sure of that last year, or 2 years or 3 years or 4 years ago?
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (43m) : Janis > Adams (bahahah)
Zero2Cool (2h) : Hundley attempted only four throws that traveled at least 15 yards downfield
Zero2Cool (4h) : Levity. We stinks!
uffda udfa (10h) : Some levity (1 NSFW word) https://twitter.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/922208193819955200
Zero2Cool (15h) : @PGPackersNews Nelson, Adams and Cobb combined for five receptions. That's a formula for losing.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Do you see them not getting separation?
Cheesey (18h) : I'd like to see our WRs get some separation.
Zero2Cool (18h) : McCarthy protecting Hundley: "Our passing game, we can sit here and pick it apart all we want, but let's just blame it on head coach today."
Zero2Cool (18h) : Brett Hundley: "All I can say is don't write us off."
Zero2Cool (19h) : yinzer is als o 8 - 1 ...nice start dudes
Zero2Cool (19h) : dhazer is 8 - 1 this week so far in pick'em ...dayum
Zero2Cool (22h) : @Michael_Cohen13 Kevin King has been standing on the sideline for a few plays now. #Packers have been rolling with House and Hawkins. Not su
Zero2Cool (22h) : Justin McCray will start at LG today. What a ride for him the last two years. Arena Football League, free agent/unemployed, #Packers starter
yooperfan (22h) : Here we go gang!!!!
Zero2Cool (23h) : WR willie snead OUT
musccy (23h) : no worries...appreciate the pointers to find it.
Zero2Cool (23h) : i couldn't find another alternative so ... no more feed here
Zero2Cool (23h) : ya justin.tv flipped their vision on streaming
musccy (23h) : just did, thanks zero. Used to use Justin...not sure they work anymore
Zero2Cool (23h) : sure is gusty winds here i can hear the wind blowing an rain falling
Zero2Cool (23h) : check the top thread in packers forum section
musccy (23h) : Thanks zero!
Zero2Cool (23h) : http://goatdee.net/ <-- usually has good links
Zero2Cool (23h) : muscy, nerdmann usually has al ink in chat
Zero2Cool (23h) : and the tarp is back on the field
musccy (23h) : dumb question...ways to watch game online? Don't want to wait for game pass tonight
uffda udfa (22-Oct) : Bakh and Bulaga active. Linsley, too. Lane Taylor, Out.
buckeyepackfan (22-Oct) : Looks pretty clear after that
buckeyepackfan (22-Oct) : Radar showing another band of showers probably within the hour.
Zero2Cool (22-Oct) : and now its not raining at all
Zero2Cool (22-Oct) : Right now it's just rain. Not light, not pouring.
buckeyepackfan (22-Oct) : Light showers? Or heavy downpour?
Zero2Cool (22-Oct) : It's raining in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (22-Oct) : @RapSheet just said on NFL Morning the org does NOT expect 12 to return due to significant break.
uffda udfa (22-Oct) : Schefter reporting doctors believe 12 can resume throwing in 6 weeks.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

Headlines