Green Bay Packers Forum
2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline longtimefan  
#16 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:03:10 PM(UTC)
116 comments on that site and about 99% are bashing Brett
Offline bozz_2006  
#17 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:08:00 PM(UTC)
nothing unifies the mob sentiment like a common enemy. just sayin'
Offline dfosterf  
#18 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:14:04 PM(UTC)
Two of the comments are mine.

The only thing negative I stated was speculation (since Andrew speculated, so can I) that Brett's ego and insecurities were used against him in the sense that he interpreted silence--as in not making the (required) annual pilgrimage down to Kiln to sit at the Lord's throne (I didn't say that part, lol)--

as not being wanted anymore.

A passive but tacit (and perhaps the most classy way) of letting him know that the Packers were moving on without him.

His ego and insecurities did him in as a Packer...That is what I said.
Offline evad04  
#19 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:55:22 PM(UTC)
Could someone help me out with the timeline of events? Didn't the Packers front office make an attempt at getting Brett to unretire and recommit to coming back for another season?

The entire soap opera was so vast and the number of new developments were so plentiful -- it's difficult to keep track of the clusterf**k. I do recall, sans specific evidence, that they recruited him after the teary-eyed retirement. He said no; they moved on.

I'm not making this up, right?
Offline wils0646  
#20 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:53:08 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Could someone help me out with the timeline of events? Didn't the Packers front office make an attempt at getting Brett to unretire and recommit to coming back for another season?

The entire soap opera was so vast and the number of new developments were so plentiful -- it's difficult to keep track of the clusterf**k. I do recall, sans specific evidence, that they recruited him after the teary-eyed retirement. He said no; they moved on.

I'm not making this up, right?


http://m.espn.go.com/nfl...d=3484868&topId=null

Quote:

-March 6: Favre's tearful press conference. McCarthy says he is surprised at how honest Favre is about the reasons behind his decision -- particularly about not being able to commit 100 percent to football.

-Week of March 24: During the coaching staff's spring break, Packers offensive line coach James Campen, whose in-laws live in New Orleans, goes up to visit Favre in Mississippi on March 26. On the 27th, Campen tells McCarthy Favre is having second thoughts and McCarthy should call him.

He does, and learns that Favre indeed is having second thoughts. McCarthy and Thompson decide they will welcome him back. They secure a private jet from a Packers board member to visit Favre in person and seal the deal.

-March 29: Favre calls McCarthy to deliver a message: Thanks, but no thanks.

"He felt at this point we had reached a point of closure," McCarthy said. "Those were his words. And he was going to stick with his initial decision."


Yes, you are right about that.
Offline all_about_da_packers  
#21 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:55:21 PM(UTC)
^ In addition, I think one of the points in accepting Brett back initially was that he'd have to compete with Rodgers for the starting job, it wouldn't just be handed to him.
Offline evad04  
#22 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:10:14 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
^ In addition, I think one of the points in accepting Brett back initially was that he'd have to compete with Rodgers for the starting job, it wouldn't just be handed to him.


To be clear, this was a stipulation made late in the summer -- not the late March courtship of Favre. Later in the summer, after everything had reached "Super Clusterf**k" status, yes, the Packers said he'd come back and compete for the job. Then Favre met with McCarthy for several hours, and when it was all done the "train [had] left the station."
Offline dd80forever  
#23 Posted : Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:40:28 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
116 comments on that site and about 99% are bashing Brett



Oh yeah

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/FIRE-TED-THOMPSON


How many are bashing Ted?

I can play silly games too LT.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko


Tweeter