Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online yooperfan  
#11 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 5:53:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,634
Applause Received: 649
I think I'd stick with what we have with the 2 rooks and keep building this young team.
Offline RaiderPride  
#12 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 5:58:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 271
Applause Received: 335
I have complete and total trust in what the Packers are doing and the path that they have chosen to take.

There is a reason I was not interviewed for the Head coach or G.M. job in Green Bay.

Although, they should have hired me to handle the media/PR instead of that White House Hack.

R.P.
Offline wpr  
#13 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 6:13:52 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,994
Applause Received: 2,043
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
There is a reason I was not interviewed for the Head coach or G.M. job in Green Bay.


Did it involve Canadian Club?


I would advise you not to answer that question, rather direct it to the Chinese Media Commission for a statement.
Offline minnypacker  
#14 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 6:27:03 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
We could always pick up Craig Nall again ;)


Or Tim Rattay. Think of guys who have run the Packers (mcCarthy System) they very likely could get a call during the season.
Offline Pack93z  
#15 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 6:29:36 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
" said: Go to Quoted Post

I completely disagree with you.

Rodgers goes down, the season's lost. Put Brohm in there. Have him learn. See what he's made of.

I keep Rodgers, Brohm, Flynn. Don't want a Vet. Only Vet I'd want is Jeff Garcia and he's staying put.


You disagree with me.. how dare you.. :lol: (*edit.. to make sure it is clear.. disagree with me often.. I make plenty of misreads)

What I am saying is just this.. we have the pieces in place to make a deep run into the playoffs.. but it all hinges on Arod...

My opinion.. is you minimize the risk of ruining your season on the loss of one single player.. regardless of position. By relying on completely unproven players behind your starter is a huge risk.. by signing a veteran a couple weeks/months ago that could have minimized your dependency on rookies would be a fair move to the rest of your ball club.

To hammer home the point, that move a couple weeks ago may not have been a former QB.. if I was pretty confident that relationship was beyond repair I would have moved on acquiring another option for the club.

In my business I design everything with a failsafe redundancy option.. two rookies behind a first time starter doesn't equal that in my book. Again.. just my opinion.. but the dragging out the summer drama has put us in a bit of a bind here.. but again.. what is in the best interest of the club needs to prevail.

And RP.. I have faith in the leadership of this club.. however this is a risk that doesn't have much room for error. Name another club out there with only 3 QB's on the roster going through camp?

As a fan of this club, I see nothing wrong with questioning the soundness of this QB strategy we are deploying.
Offline zombieslayer  
#16 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 8:33:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
" said: Go to Quoted Post

You disagree with me.. how dare you.. :lol: (*edit.. to make sure it is clear.. disagree with me often.. I make plenty of misreads)

What I am saying is just this.. we have the pieces in place to make a deep run into the playoffs.. but it all hinges on Arod...

My opinion.. is you minimize the risk of ruining your season on the loss of one single player.. regardless of position. By relying on completely unproven players behind your starter is a huge risk.. by signing a veteran a couple weeks/months ago that could have minimized your dependency on rookies would be a fair move to the rest of your ball club.

To hammer home the point, that move a couple weeks ago may not have been a former QB.. if I was pretty confident that relationship was beyond repair I would have moved on acquiring another option for the club.

In my business I design everything with a failsafe redundancy option.. two rookies behind a first time starter doesn't equal that in my book. Again.. just my opinion.. but the dragging out the summer drama has put us in a bit of a bind here.. but again.. what is in the best interest of the club needs to prevail.

And RP.. I have faith in the leadership of this club.. however this is a risk that doesn't have much room for error. Name another club out there with only 3 QB's on the roster going through camp?

As a fan of this club, I see nothing wrong with questioning the soundness of this QB strategy we are deploying.


Good argument.

My counter:

We got rid of Brett Favre, so, the new strategy is building for the future rather than try to win it all now. I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's my understanding of what we're doing.

I don't think anyone who's sober can tell me with a straight face that Aaron Rodgers is a better QB than Brett Favre. But, TT/MM's lines of reasoning are Rodgers has upside, Favre has downside, and instead of having the Sherman strategy of damning our future for a shot to win it all now, we are planning to be good for a very long time.

Now, if you're planning to be good for a long time, you want 2 good QBs. You have Aaron Rodgers, your starter, and you train Brian Brohm to be his backup. If you put a Vet in there, the Vet becomes #2, we lose Flynn completely (who may be a long-term project), and Brohm never sees the field. Do you really want to sacrifice our long-term QB development for a win now approach?
Offline DGB454  
#17 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 9:31:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 11/18/2007(UTC)
Location: At home
Applause Given: 32
Applause Received: 7
Stay with the current group. If The Rodgers goes down then were doomed. What other choice do we have at this point? No good vets out there right now unless Johnson is cut loose. I think Culpepper would be trouble. I believe he would keep pushing for the starting position and cause a rift in the locker room if Rodgers doesn't tear it up the first couple games.
Offline wils0646  
#18 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 9:32:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 12/15/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 4
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

You disagree with me.. how dare you.. :lol: (*edit.. to make sure it is clear.. disagree with me often.. I make plenty of misreads)

What I am saying is just this.. we have the pieces in place to make a deep run into the playoffs.. but it all hinges on Arod...

My opinion.. is you minimize the risk of ruining your season on the loss of one single player.. regardless of position. By relying on completely unproven players behind your starter is a huge risk.. by signing a veteran a couple weeks/months ago that could have minimized your dependency on rookies would be a fair move to the rest of your ball club.

To hammer home the point, that move a couple weeks ago may not have been a former QB.. if I was pretty confident that relationship was beyond repair I would have moved on acquiring another option for the club.

In my business I design everything with a failsafe redundancy option.. two rookies behind a first time starter doesn't equal that in my book. Again.. just my opinion.. but the dragging out the summer drama has put us in a bit of a bind here.. but again.. what is in the best interest of the club needs to prevail.

And RP.. I have faith in the leadership of this club.. however this is a risk that doesn't have much room for error. Name another club out there with only 3 QB's on the roster going through camp?

As a fan of this club, I see nothing wrong with questioning the soundness of this QB strategy we are deploying.


Good argument.

My counter:

We got rid of Brett Favre, so, the new strategy is building for the future rather than try to win it all now. I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's my understanding of what we're doing.

I don't think anyone who's sober can tell me with a straight face that Aaron Rodgers is a better QB than Brett Favre. But, TT/MM's lines of reasoning are Rodgers has upside, Favre has downside, and instead of having the Sherman strategy of damning our future for a shot to win it all now, we are planning to be good for a very long time.

Now, if you're planning to be good for a long time, you want 2 good QBs. You have Aaron Rodgers, your starter, and you train Brian Brohm to be his backup. If you put a Vet in there, the Vet becomes #2, we lose Flynn completely (who may be a long-term project), and Brohm never sees the field. Do you really want to sacrifice our long-term QB development for a win now approach?


I think management wants to win now though. It just doesn't seem right to have 0 experience behind the main guy, especially if you consider Rodgers injury prone (which I don't). I'm guessing Ted Thompson does add a vet before the season starts.

edit: LOL, LOVE THE T T WORD FILTER.
Offline DGB454  
#19 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 9:38:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 11/18/2007(UTC)
Location: At home
Applause Given: 32
Applause Received: 7
Gotta try that.
Ted Thompson Ted Thompson Ted Thompson



Hmmm.......Can't put 3 Ted Thompson in a row I guess.
Offline RaiderPride  
#20 Posted : Friday, August 15, 2008 10:08:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 271
Applause Received: 335
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
There is a reason I was not interviewed for the Head coach or G.M. job in Green Bay.


Did it involve Canadian Club?


Damn Right it did. Canadian Club on the Rocks.

It is time that I lay it out here. So you know where I am coming from.

Do you remember "Jerry Tagge" Ok, I was his agent. I Signed him out of Nebraska after he was MVP of the Orange Bowl in 1971 and 1972. When Jerry was named Co-MVP of the Hula Bowl we signed a contract with the Green Bay Packers.

When Jerry Tagge came to the Packers Ted Thompson hated him. Ted was a young man at that time delivering inter office mail in the Packers organization at the time.

Ted would steal the stats in the inter office mail and adjust them so it looked Like Jerry was playing bad when he released the numbers to the press.

Because of a young, vindictive, Ted Thompson, in the mail room in 1972 Jerry Tagge never got a fair shot. At the time Ted was heard to say in the mail room... "This is my team, and I want to build it my way."

To make a long story short. Jerry Tagge and I were very upset. We decided to go fishing in B.C. We were shit faced on Canadian Club in a strip bar and we met Vick Rapp the coach of the B.C. Lions and the rest is history.

Jerry Tagge- He was named a CFL all-star and winner of the Jeff Nicklin Memorial Trophy and runner-up for the CFL's Most Outstanding Player Award. In 1977, he completed 232 of 405 passes for 2787 yards, and in 1978, he hit on 243 of 430 passes for 3134 yards. He played part of the 1979 season before injuries forced him to retire.

See... Ted Thompson is evil. Jerry Tagge could have been Brett Favre from 1973 t0 1992.

Ted has to go. He has an ego. he had it ever since he worked in the Packer Mail Room as a delivery boy.

Let's all get rid of Ted.

R.P.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (19m) : Our guys talking too much about SB while ATL focused all on today.
uffda udfa (20m) : Matt Ryan has a great mindset for this game. Think he'll play well.
uffda udfa (21m) : Just like the playoff game from 2010 season.
uffda udfa (22m) : Atlanta couldn't find a bigger name for the anthem?
uffda udfa (31m) : Julio Jones anything but fine has 3 injuries in foot per Glazer.
uffda udfa (42m) : Looks like the club is off for Nick.
uffda udfa (42m) : Nick Perry has no future as a motivational speaker.
uffda udfa (1h) : Davante hasn't run in warm-ups just playing catch w/87 and talking 2 Erin Andrews.
GoPack1984 (1h) : All ACTIVE for #Packers: WR Jordy Nelson WR Davante Adams WR Geronimo Allison S Morgan Burnett RB Christine Michael CB Quinten Rollins
uffda udfa (1h) : All our guys are officially active. Go Pack Go
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers inactives: Joe Callahan, Max McCaffrey, Herb Waters, Joe Kerridge, James Starks, Kyle Murphy, Christian Ringo
Zero2Cool (1h) : Christine Michael ... ACTIVE
Zero2Cool (1h) : Nelson, Adams, Geronimo. ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Rollins and Burnett are ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (2h) : #Packers RB Christine Michael (back) just completed a workout in front of trainers by doing a backflip. Which seems like a good sign.
Zero2Cool (2h) : #Packers WR Jordy Nelson, Davonte Adams and Geronimo Allison, Randall Cobb, Travis Davis, Jeff Janis will all be active. One more than usual
mojaveson (2h) : Go Pack Go!
Mucky Tundra (3h) : speaking of Montgomery and 24, i think he'll have that many touches today :)
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ty Montgomery turns 24 today. Richard Rodgers turns 25 today.
Smokey (5h) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (5h) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (8h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (10h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (10h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (12h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (12h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (13h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (16h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (16h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (16h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (17h) : uh oh'
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

2h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Packers Headlines