Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
musccy  
#1 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:19:32 PM(UTC)
They didn't affect the outcome of the game and I'm not trying to start a horrible officiating thread here, just some curiosities.

Swain Drop: Everyone seemed to agree this wasn't a catch, but what about it wasn't a catch? I used to think 2 feet and a football move = catch, and my take through my green 'n gold glasses saw him twist 180 degrees, get two feet down and move up field before the ball was jostled loose.

Collins' Celebration: This wasn't explained much, but it looked like flags were thrown just as he got to his knees in the back of the endzone. I don't even know what the letter of the law is, but I can assure you that my TD celebration at my apt. was 100 times more exuberant than his! He just pick 6'd and put the Packers up 14 in the Super Bowl, give him some leeway.
Nonstopdrivel  
#2 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:24:02 PM(UTC)
The commentators were all saying they thought the Swain drop was a catch, and the more I watched the replays, the more I was inclined to agree with them. I think it should have been ruled a fumble recovered by Jennings.

And can anyone explain to me why the NFL sees a substantive difference between kneeling on one knee versus kneeling on two knees in the end zone? Both can be expressions of prayer or exultation. It makes no sense.
musccy  
#3 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:25:16 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The commentators were all saying they thought the Swain drop was a catch, and the more I watched the replays, the more I was inclined to agree with them. I think it should have been ruled a fumble recovered by Jennings.


Aikman, Periera (sp?) and Buck all felt it was a drop, as did ESPN after the game.
Nonstopdrivel  
#4 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:26:50 PM(UTC)
I was watching ESPN America. Different set of commentators.
Pack93z  
#5 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:28:23 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The commentators were all saying they thought the Swain drop was a catch, and the more I watched the replays, the more I was inclined to agree with them. I think it should have been ruled a fumble recovered by Jennings.


Don't know which broadcast you watched.. but they were in the camp it wasn't a catch. *edit.. your above response posted during my reply.

I am sorry.. this is one of the areas the NFL needs to scrub this season.. defining a catch and taking out this nonsense of a football move in its definition.

By the rules established today.. it is a judgment what a football move is.

IMO.. two feet down with established possession is a catch.

IMO.. Swain never effectively established possession cleanly.. and they ruled it correctly regardless of the silly and pathetic football move.
El3ment12  
#6 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:29:32 PM(UTC)
Well It was "bang, bang" or something. The officiating head or whatever said you should judge it real time, not in slow motion. Makes sense I guess.

And the Collins celebration was stupid to call. It gave the steelers good feild position. If we lost I would have been super pissed. Oh, and the facemask that wasn't a facemask!!!!!

It's cool though we won :)
Pack93z  
#7 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:31:33 PM(UTC)
On Collins.. he ran all the way across the endzone and was probably move for the delay (and the group) than the act itself.

Commonly players take knees.. but I think it was the circumstances in which Collins did it.

No Fun League is still in effect even on the big stage.
musccy  
#8 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:37:27 PM(UTC)
the facemask WAS a horrible call...but again, I'm in no way saying that affected the outcome. There were probably a few PIs the Packers could have been called for in the first half, so it all came out in the laundry, I'm bringing this up to question the RULES rather than the refs.
TOPackerFan  
#9 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:40:33 PM(UTC)
You can't "go to the ground" when celebrating a TD, with the exception being you're allowed to kneel in prayer. Stupid rule, but the right call.

I thought Swain was a catch, but that's probably only because Jennings recovered. If the Steelers had recovered, I'd have been screaming no football move therfore no catch.
longtimefan  
#10 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:40:48 PM(UTC)
Cant use ground in celebration

Recall the huge issue with Jared Allen and his rope tie celebration after a sack?

Was told cant use a knee on the ground

Stupid as hell buts a rule
Nonstopdrivel  
#11 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:41:02 PM(UTC)
It's gotten to the point where catches are defined with microscopic precision, which ironically actually muddles things up. I think the rule should basically be: If it looks like a catch, it's a catch, goddammit. It's stupid that trivialities like the ball rotating in the receiver's hand or the nose hitting the ground even though the receiver's palms are clearly under the ball can invalidate what's obviously a catch. And the whole "process of catching the ball" nonsense needs to go. Return the game to its intuitive roots instead of its legalistic paralysis.
Greg C.  
#12 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:42:07 PM(UTC)
I was going to start an officiating thread, mostly to say that the officials did okay except for the bogus facemask call on Crabtree. But these two plays are worth discussing. I think the announcers let us down by not explaining them better.

With the Collins thing, I think somebody (maybe the official) said something about "going to the ground" as part of the celebration. I didn't know there was a rule against that. It didn't look excessive, but if there's a rule against it, they had to enforce it.

As for the Swain play, it had the look of a non-catch to me because he didn't tuck it in. I think the officials have been pretty consistent on those kinds of plays, so I wasn't mad about it, though on the other hand, it was worth challenging.

I did think that it was a pretty clean game from an officiating standpoint. Most of the penalties were false starts or obvious holds. There were no pass interference controversies, which is more a credit to the DBs than to the officials. And the personal fouls by Williams and the Steeler player were obvious.

As I said before, the Crabtree penalty looked like a blatant screw-up. It was sort of a flukey play and I can see how it may have looked like a facemask in real time, but I still say that you shouldn't call a penalty unless you actually see it--and you can't see something that didn't happen.
Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:42:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Cant use ground in celebration

Recall the huge issue with Jared Allen and his rope tie celebration after a sack?

Was told cant use a knee on the ground

Stupid as hell buts a rule


Correct emundo. Accurate flag, stupid rule. Kind of a running theme in the NFL. Too many rules, too much gray area.
Greg C.  
#14 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:44:04 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I thought Swain was a catch, but that's probably only because Jennings recovered. If the Steelers had recovered, I'd have been screaming no football move therfore no catch.


I just gave you an applaud point for a very rare demonstration of honesty by a fan.
mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:46:23 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
On Collins.. he ran all the way across the endzone and was probably move for the delay (and the group) than the act itself.

Commonly players take knees.. but I think it was the circumstances in which Collins did it.

No Fun League is still in effect even on the big stage.


What the rules say aside, how can anyone say Collins' celebration was excessive and Mendenhall's was not? It's a display of elation, it's not offensive or over the top. That should never be a penalty in any game.
Nonstopdrivel  
#16 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:49:36 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
As I said before, the Crabtree penalty looked like a blatant screw-up.


A prime example of exactly the kind of officiating call that needs to be made subject to challenge. I am of the belief that any and all calls should be subject to review. It's ridiculous that such an obvious gaffe -- with such strong consequences -- can't be overturned when even a quick glance at the replay reveals it to have been wrong. That isn't even matter of a judgment call. He unambiguously did not touch the facemask.
Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:52:33 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
the facemask WAS a horrible call...but again, I'm in no way saying that affected the outcome. There were probably a few PIs the Packers could have been called for in the first half, so it all came out in the laundry, I'm bringing this up to question the RULES rather than the refs.


Here is the problem.. by looks without zooming in, by the body language of the returner it looked like a facemask.. at first glace I thought it is on.

Officials are human.. and it wasn't the flagrant of a mistake.

Unless you can challenge a penalty, I don't think you can crucify the official in this call.
musccy  
#18 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:54:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post

What the rules say aside, how can anyone say Collins' celebration was excessive and Mendenhall's was not? It's a display of elation, it's not offensive or over the top. That should never be a penalty in any game.


I get the letter of the law, but this is like the K-State/Syracuse thing, you have to consider the moment. Honestly, I was too busy running around my apartment screaming at the top of my lungs to see there was a flag. It was only on the kickoff, and subsequent replays of his celebration that I realized what had happened...so if I was that jubliant, how do you think the players felt?

It's a shades of grey issue, but c'mon, you need to allow for some emotional outlet!
musccy  
#19 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 6:01:08 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post


Here is the problem.. by looks without zooming in, by the body language of the returner it looked like a facemask.. at first glace I thought it is on.

Officials are human.. and it wasn't the flagrant of a mistake.

Unless you can challenge a penalty, I don't think you can crucify the official in this call.


I tried to make this point in my post that I'm not trying to question the refs in this game...I used to ref 10 year old soccer games and had soccer moms f-bomb me left and right. Hated ever second of it, and developed a new respect for what refs deal with. I'm just trying to call a spade a spade on the FM penalty (and acknowledge not an easy call) and am questioning the RULES more than anything. Letter of the law, Collins could have been flagged, it's just been a rule that has allowed for some leeway for interpretation which is my beef with it.

I'm in no way saying the refs affected the outcome. As I said, I think there were some PIs that went uncalled that worked in GB's favor.
RedSoxExcel  
#20 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 7:22:34 PM(UTC)
Who cares now, we won the Super Bowl!
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : Weird, I thought they had parted ways with him already. Apparently he was just on IR.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers expected to visit with veteran tight end Marcedes Lewis
DarkaneRules (4h) : And whether any improvement will be enough to make the team.
DarkaneRules (4h) : Goodson wasn't very good but it's been a while. He gets an opportunity to show how he's improved.
Zero2Cool (5h) : I still say Goodson is trash.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Aaron Rodgers brought up CB Demetri Goodson unprompted on Tuesday. "He's made some plays already during the two days (of OTAs)."
beast (18h) : Black 21.5" 5ms Widescreen LED Backlight‎
Zero2Cool (18h) : VA2246M-LED
beast (20h) : LB Mychal Kendricks anybody? ... good speed LB... and hoping he doesn't want to go play with his brother on the Vikings
Zero2Cool (22-May) : players picked from Nos. 1 to 21 in the first round receive fully guaranteed contracts.
beast (21-May) : Rumor is that Richie Incognito wants to retire, he just wanted to be released first so that he didn't have to play back any of his signing bonus.
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Bills have released G Richie Incognito -->>> ?? Packers?
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : or very shortly after being drafted
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : from reading about it, sounds like he went to rehab before even being drafted
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : didn't know about the other two stints
Zero2Cool (21-May) : favre went into rehab three times, ... i didn't know that and i thought i knew everything. WTF
Zero2Cool (21-May) : ass fuck? you sick bastid
Nonstopdrivel (20-May) : Not that I've . . . ASS! FUCK!
Nonstopdrivel (20-May) : Not that I've noticed. Noticed. Iced.
Cheesey (20-May) : Hey Nonstop.....do you know you have a history of repeating yourself?
Cheesey (20-May) : Hey Nonstop...do you know you have a history of repeating yourself?
Nonstopdrivel (19-May) : Reading Melt74's posting history is pretty funny. There aren't many members more laconic than he.
Nonstopdrivel (19-May) : Reading Melt74's posting history is pretty funny. There aren't many members more laconic than he.
wpr (19-May) : Wie gehts?
Porforis (18-May) : Guten tag.
Nonstopdrivel (18-May) : Gute . . . use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
Porforis (18-May) : I am Gute.
Zero2Cool (18-May) : That is gute.
gbguy20 (15-May) : nvm just read about it. KT coffee is now the official coffee of the packers and will be served at Lambeau. taking over naming rights of the Verizon wireless gate and much more. sweet.
gbguy20 (15-May) : what's the details on the packers w/ kwik trip, Kevin?
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Packers & @KwikTrip expand & enhance their partnership
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Packers have signed first-round pick Jaire Alexander.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Jason Witten, who also listed the Saints as a landing spot.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : “I think he’s going to end up going to the Green Bay Packers.” Jason Witten to @AdamSchefter about Dez Bryant.
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Marshall Newhouse ✔ @MNewhouse73 Hey, Legalize sports gambling all you want, but there’s no true gamble quite like whether to trust a fart or not.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
28m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

20-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

19-May / Random Babble / Nonstopdrivel

17-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

13-May / Random Babble / KRK

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

Headlines